[ANN] Riak CS 1.4.1

2013-09-10 Thread Seth Thomas
Riak CS Users,We are pleased to announce the availability of Riak CS 1.4.1. This is a bugfix release based on the 1.4.x series of Riak CS.Fixes include:Fix list objects crash when more than the first 1001 keys are in the pending delete stateFix crash in garbage collection daemonFix packaging bug

Howto add Users without anonymous / whats the deal with URLs

2013-09-10 Thread Andre Lohmann
Hi there, I managed to install a 5 Node RIAK CS Cluster and it seems to work fine. Anyway, there are some things I still do not understand: I managed to add, revoke, remove users through riak-cs-controll, but I don't really like to use this tool, as for me it feels like another possible

local_put_failed error

2013-09-10 Thread Vladimir Shabanov
Recently my Riak nodes started returning errors local_put_failed. It happens on many nodes. Half of my nodes are Riak 1.3.1, half upgraded 1.3.2 (this setup worked for more than a month without any problems). I found in http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/running/recovery/errors/ that this can

Re: local_put_failed error

2013-09-10 Thread Vladimir Shabanov
Some more information. Error doesn't seem to be related to particular node/partition since put operations succeed on retries. Errors appear few times a second while I'm making about 500-1000 write requests a second. There were no increase in cluster load before this error started to appear (in

Re: Howto add Users without anonymous / whats the deal with URLs

2013-09-10 Thread Hector Castro
Hi Andre,We are working to improve the user management tooling for Riak CS. A pretty much read-only prototype CLI can be found under our basho-labs GitHub organization. [0]If you don't want to use Riak CS Control to manage users, your best alternatives right now are:- s3curl- fogExamples of how to

Should content-type not be required?

2013-09-10 Thread Vincenzo Vitale
Suppose I want to just store keys in a bucket without any body, this make sense in scenarios where the key completely identify the entity. Is it possible to use the riak http api without including the content-type header? Looking at the http specifications, content–type is not mandatory or

Re: Should content-type not be required?

2013-09-10 Thread Sam Elliott
The content-type is important for Riak KV: Various clients will use it to identify the difference between a response where the whole body is the key, or a response that contains siblings (if you have allow_mult=true). I suggest finding or creating a content type, so that this is clearer to your

Re: Should content-type not be required?

2013-09-10 Thread Vincenzo Vitale
Hi Sam, thanks for the fast reply. In my company we normally use your third suggestion and indeed it's a robust strategy. At the moment we are relying on a riak client based on spray ( https://github.com/agemooij/riak-scala-client) so even if we set the Content-Type - when the body is empty - it

Re: Download stops at certain megabyte boundary (RiakCS)

2013-09-10 Thread Shunichi Shinohara
Martin, I think you have already read this page: http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/configuration/Configuring-Riak/#Setting-up-the-Proper-Riak-Backend As it says, you can use add_paths to set load path. -- Shunichi Shinohara Basho Japan KK On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Martin

Re: Should content-type not be required?

2013-09-10 Thread Sam Elliott
I'm interested to know why you're trying to store an empty body in Riak. Surely just don't even make the request to Riak? I guess I could be overlooking something obvious. Sam -- Sam Elliott Engineer sam.elli...@basho.com -- On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 6:29PM, Vincenzo Vitale wrote: