Hi
With Java client 1.1.3 and Riak 1.3.1
I'm doing:
WriteBucket wb =
iclient.createBucket(BUCKET_NAME).nVal(3).allowSiblings(true);
Bucket b = wb.execute();
_logger.fine(Regular bucket: + bucket + , allows siblings? +
bucket.getAllowSiblings());
DomainBucketBuilder
We have a 5 node riak cluster to store site images, with N=3, R=1. When we
turned off one node, a lot of GET requests failed, which made me think those
requested images (3 copies of them) all landed on the failed physical node.
Is there a way to tell how the replicas are distributed among the
Hi,
I have a two node Riak CS (1.4) cluster set up on two nodes (node-1 and node-2
henceforth). Node-1 is the headnode. Both node-1 and node-2 are running
CentOS-6.4.
Node-1
* Riak 1.4.2
* Stanchion 1.4.1
* Riak-CS 1.4.1
* Riak-CS-Control 1.0.2
Node-2
* Riak 1.4.2
*
What you saw is actually quite typical when using R=1.
When you turn off a node, Riak's sloppy quorum behavior will kick in and hand
off some of your read requests to an empty data partition to supplement the two
remaining partitions that still have a copy. Since the partition is empty, it
can
(Just to be extra clear, that's meant to be a comma at the end of that
directive, not a period. Also, don't forget to restart Riak CS Control,
after changing the proxy host).
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Dmitri Zagidulin dzagidu...@basho.comwrote:
Hi Siddhu,
Can you try changing
Hi Siddhu,
Can you try changing 'cs_proxy_host' to localhost? So:
{cs_proxy_host, 127.0.0.1 }.
and retry.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Siddhu Warrier (siwarrie)
siwar...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a two node Riak CS (1.4) cluster set up on two nodes (node-1 and
node-2
Hi Dimitri,
Thank you for your email. I just tried this. I still have the same problem,
except that I no longer get 403 errors in my Riak CS error log (as a matter of
fact, I get nothing at all in my Riak CS, Riak CS Control, Stanchion, and Riak
error logs).
I've put the basic config section
Ok, I suspect it has to do with a mismatch between cs_root_host setting in
riakcs.app.config and the corresponding setting in
riak-cs-control.app.config. Can you attach your .s3cfg, so I can confirm?
Dmitri
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Siddhu Warrier (siwarrie)
siwar...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Dmitri,
Sorry I failed to attach the s3cfg file.
Cheers,
Siddhu
From: Dmitri Zagidulin dzagidu...@basho.commailto:dzagidu...@basho.com
Date: Wednesday, 9 October 2013 16:51
To: Siddhu Warrier siwar...@cisco.commailto:siwar...@cisco.com
Cc:
Ok, yes, I think the hostname mismatch betwen CS and CS Control is at issue
(it's somewhat confusing, I agree).
So:
Since you have
{cs_root_host, s3.amazonaws.com},
in CS Config, you want your cs_hostname to match that in CS Control's
config. So, my CS Control config looks like:
%%
Hi All,
For those of you playing along at home, we're a mere 19 days away from
RICON West in San Francisco. We just finalized the official schedule.
You can memorize it here:
* http://ricon.io/west.html#schedule
Arguably of more importance, we only have 30 tickets left. If you're
planning to
Thank for reply.
The thing is that bucket never converges. The allow_mult remains false even
several minutes after handoff had finished.
I don't know whether it's because properties get overwritten by defaults
during gossip or it's because message from client(s) never reaches Riak.
This
Could this be a duplicate of bug 660?
https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/issues/660
I can reliably reproduce this on a local 5 node stagedevrel cluster on Riak
1.4.2 and develop.
---
Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
Cloudera Certified Developer for
It does sound similar, although in my case I just create brand new bucket
with allow_multi=true, which does not seem to
be accepted (although client says it is). I'm not trying to reset bucket
properties, but maybe it's a good test to to that to see i it gets unstuck.
D.
On 9 October 2013
Hi Everyone,
I am using Corrugated Iron(CI) for Riak in my WCF
REST application. After adding CI, the web services started to send response
very slow. All immediate consecutive request to the REST end points get queued
up and the responses are delayed more. If anyone
Pandiarajan,
Can you please answer some questions for me:
1. What is your application architecture? Are you consuming CI as a
transport from WCF or are you calling CI from a RESTful server?
2. Prior to adding CI, how were you talking to Riak?
3. Have you ran basho_bench against your
oops! hit send too early.
4. What is your Riak cluster setup? (eg. how many nodes, configuration
setteings, etc).
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:26 AM, OJ Reeves o...@buffered.io wrote:
Pandiarajan,
Can you please answer some questions for me:
1. What is your application architecture? Are
The reason for the hostname having to be equal on both hosts is because the
HMAC which is generated as part of the S3 API uses this information. The
following document contains more information.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/RESTAuthentication.html
- Chris
--
Christopher
18 matches
Mail list logo
