Hi Nathan,
One alternative to the pure 2i-based solution for this would be time
boxing. Sean referenced it a few months back on the list [1] and it's
worth investigating. There are a few other resources I'm failing to
remember at the moment but I'll send them along tomorrow if I do.
That said, 2i
Hi everyone,
So, I went to copy /var/lib/riak/* from one five-node cluster to another, so
that we could experiment on the data.
I did this fairly frequently in the past ( 1.4.0), and always used riak-admin
reip old new.
Now, when I try that command on our 1.4.2 ring, 'riak-admin' dies with
Hello,
I want to try the following setup for a cloud-storage project :
- a cluster of x86 servers with SAS drives running Riak CS
- the replication for the metadata will be Nx3 on the servers running
Riak
- data for the objects will be stored on a NFS shared storage (SONAS
probably)
If you really want an S3 API layer around NFS, I suspect you'd be better off
taking the code from Riak CS and creating your own solution than attempting
this approach.
One example of how this would run into trouble: if any server fails, nearly
every large object would be unavailable because of
Thanks to Joe Caswell at Basho: just have to comment out line 382
(node_up_check) in the riak-admin script.
--
Dave Brady
- Original Message -
From: Dave Brady dbr...@weborama.com
To: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Sent: Lundi 21 Octobre 2013 13:59:37
Subject: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no
This was a mistake on my part, if you s/up/down/ (node_down_check) on that
line it will correctly ensure the node is down before running reip. Sorry
about that, clearly 'reip' is not heavily used with the new cluster
commands and it slipped under the radar for all these months.
-Jared
On Mon,
I had heard from a possibly unfounded source that creating over 1000
different secondary indexes could place a burden on cluster performance.
Can anyone confirm that?
L-P
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Alexander Sicular sicul...@gmail.comwrote:
I think that's just a memory limit.
mo 2i
...more to point: will riak_kv_console:reip still exist, and just not be
surfaced in riak-admin, or will the function be removed?
--
Dave Brady
- Original Message -
From: Dave Brady dbr...@weborama.com
To: Jared Morrow ja...@basho.com
Cc: Riak Users Mailing List
Hi Louis-Philippe,
It costs to create secondary indexes. Nothing is free.
But I'm not sure what 1000 different secondary indexes means. When you add
secondary indexes we store the name of the index and the value it indexes as
part of the object metadata and on disk in an index.
I'm sure our
We actually discussed this recently, my understanding of reip was clearly
not complete, and Joe Caswell put me on the right track. 'reip' will
continue to stick around.
-Jared
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Dave Brady dbr...@weborama.com wrote:
No problem, Jared! I'm happy it was a very
Thanks for clarifying it!
This functionality has been *great* to create quick-and-dirty test rings.
--
Dave Brady
- Original Message -
From: Jared Morrow ja...@basho.com
To: Dave Brady dbr...@weborama.com
Cc: Riak Users Mailing List riak-users@lists.basho.com
Sent: Lundi 21
Huh. I thought we were supposed to use force-replace instead of reip?
I remember having a discussion a few months back about the documentation
and we cleared it up a little.
Is reip the same as force-replace, or is it more...quick-and-dirty?
Is it deprecated?
-B.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:33
Reip is the old, evil way to do it that is fraught with peril. When it
works it works spectacularly, and when it doesn't, it fails spectacularly.
The only use case left for reip is when you have simultaneously changed the
node name for every node in the cluster, such as when loading an entire
Hi Russel,
sorry for the confusion, when I talk about different indexes, I talk about
different index names, each key only having around 10 indexes. The cluster
is rather small, 2 nodes, with a dataset of about 25GB representing around
30 key entries with a possible total secondary index
From the Riak LevelDB Page
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/backends/leveldb/
Where server resources allow, the value of max_open_files should exceed
the count of .sst table files within the vnode's database directory.
Is the vnode's database directory the numbered directory under
responses inline in '[ ]'On Oct 21, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Dave King djk...@gmail.com wrote:From the Riak LevelDB Pagehttp://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/backends/leveldb/"Where server resources allow, the value of max_open_files should exceed the count of .sst table files within the vnode's
Hi,
I've been having some trouble getting the javascript vm in Riak to
operate correctly on Date objects.
According to this, I should be able to create dates using an ISO8601
date string, or a simplified -MM-DD format.
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.9.1.15
17 matches
Mail list logo
