Also,
Using last_write_wins = true, do I need to always send the vclock while on
a PUT request? In the official documention it says that riak will look only
at the timestamp of the requests.
Best regards,
On 29 January 2014 10:29, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Hi Russel,
>
> No, it doesn't depend. It'
On 30 Jan 2014, at 10:37, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Also,
>
> Using last_write_wins = true, do I need to always send the vclock while on a
> PUT request? In the official documention it says that riak will look only at
> the timestamp of the requests.
Ok, from what you’ve said it sounds like you a
Hi,
Now I'm curious too, according to
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/configuration-files/
the default value for Erlang property last_write_wins is false, now, if
95% of the buckets/keys have no siblings (or conflict resolution), does
that mean that for such buckets las
On 30 Jan 2014, at 10:58, Guido Medina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now I'm curious too, according to
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/configuration-files/
> the default value for Erlang property last_write_wins is false, now, if 95%
> of the buckets/keys have no siblings (or con
Hi Russell,
Thanks for your response, I understand most of it, I know LWW=true and
allow_multi=true won't make any sense, but look at this scenario:
All of our buckets have allow_multi=false except for the one bucket we
have for CRDT counters, our application requires certain some level of
c
I'll try to explain this the best I can, although it's a simples
architecture I'm not describing it in my native language :)
I have a set of node.js workers (64 for now) that serve as a
cache/middleware layer for a dozen of php applications. Each worker deals
with a set of documents (it's not a di
Hi All,
I am getting the following error even through the node is not a member of
cluster.
The cluster is not prepared yet. First time I ran the nodes and I was
trying to join them in the cluster.
[root@node1 riak]# bin/riak-admin cluster join node3@172.31.6.244
Failed: This node is already a me
>From your prompt you're in node1's install directory and node1 *is*
already a member of a cluster, as shown in member-status.
You need to run the riak-admin command from the directory for the node
that is joining;
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/quickstart/#Create-the-Cluster
On Thu, Jan 30,
I'm not sure Riak is the best fit for this. Riak is great for applications
where it is the source of data, and has very strong consistency when used in
this way. You are using it as a cache, where Riak will be significantly slower
than other cache solutions. Especially since you say that each
Actually people use Riak as a distributed cache all the time. In fact, many
customers use it exclusively as a cache system. Not all backends write to disk.
Riak supports a main memory backend[1], complete with size limits and TTL.
Eric
[1]: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/backend
Hi!
I think that you are making some kind of confusion here... I'm not using
riak for cache purposes, thats exactly the opposite! Riak is my end
persistence system, I need to store the documents in a strong, secure,
available and consistent place. That's riak.
It's like I've said before, just mak
For clarity, I was responding to Jason's assertion that Riak shouldn't be used
as a cache, not to your specific issue, Edgar.
Eric
On Jan 30, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think that you are making some kind of confusion here... I'm not using riak
> for cache purposes, tha
Yes Eric, I understood :)
On 30 January 2014 23:00, Eric Redmond wrote:
> For clarity, I was responding to Jason's assertion that Riak shouldn't be
> used as a cache, not to your specific issue, Edgar.
>
> Eric
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Edgar Veiga wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I think that you ar
Here's a (bad) mockup of the solution:
https://cloudup.com/cOMhcPry38U
Hope that this time I've made myself a little more clear :)
Regards
On 30 January 2014 23:04, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Yes Eric, I understood :)
>
>
> On 30 January 2014 23:00, Eric Redmond wrote:
>
>> For clarity, I was res
Oh, I completely misunderstood, I'm sorry for that. I was thinking of your
application as a typical web application which could regenerate the data at any
time (making that the authoritative source, not Riak).
In that case, Riak does sound perfect, but I would definitely not use the
memory bac
No problem Jason, I'm glad you've tried to help :)
I'm using leveldb backend, and the system is running in production for
about 6 months. It's being quiet an interesting experience, but now that
the load is getting bigger and the amount of data in riak too, we need to
start tunning this little thi
Cool, I went ahead and created an issue a little while ago:
https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/issues/811
It's not so much of a blocker for us, because the product team working
with custom partitioners and Riak. It's just something that people
might want to keep an eye out in the future when using M
Replies inline.
(Thanks to Russell for the link to my blog series, but honestly, as I now
re-read the section on conflict resolution, I’m unhappy with it. It’s a very
confusing topic and I regret not doing a better job of clarifying it. This
answer will undoubtedly also be more confusing than I
18 matches
Mail list logo
