Hi Henrik,
It seems http proxy option[1] is needed to specify your Riak CS node
instead of the endpoint option. Could you try to use it?
Although you might already know, there is a good docs[2] which
explains how Riak CS can interact with S3 clients.
[1]:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/aws-sdk-php/v
On 5 August 2015 at 18:53, John Daily wrote:
> That’s correct: upgrades to either 2.0.x or 2.1.x are supported from the
> 1.4 series.
>
> Side note: I definitely recommend testing the upgrade process in a QA
> environment first.
>
> -John
>
Hi Sujay,
The latest release in the 2.0 series is 2.0.
Two ideas about lots of cpu with nothing happening:
- is Riak entropy setting "active". Weekly it will rebuild hash trees
- does this activity occur after a handoff? Sometimes leveldb needs time to
catch up afterward in current releases (fix coming soon).
Matthew
Sent from my iPad
> On Au
Thanks Magnus & John.
Yes certainly I will test it on a separate cluster first! Which is related
to another question I have.
If I want to backup I can archive the directories on the nodes as described
here:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/running/backups/#OS-Specific-Directory-Locations
Bu
Sujay,
You're right - the best way to verify the backup is to bring up a separate
5 node cluster, and restore it from the backup files.
The procedure is slightly more involved than untar-ing, though. The backed
up ring directories from the original cluster will contain the node ids
(which rely on
Because it's important to note, the version of Riak is 2.0.5.
AAE was actually the first thing I checked - it was on, but turning it off
had no impact.
Interestingly enough, I was able to pinpoint the source of the higher than
expected CPU to a service that was frequently polling a set of map and
Kazuhiro Suzuki wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
Hi All
>
> It seems http proxy option[1] is needed to specify your Riak CS node
> instead of the endpoint option. Could you try to use it?
> Although you might already know, there is a good docs[2] which
> explains how Riak CS can interact with S3 clients.
>
Hi Raik user group,
I'm using riak and riak-cs 1.4.2. Last weekend, I added four nodes to cluster
with 5 nodes. However, it's failed with one of disks 100% full.
As you know bitcask storage engine can not support multifolders.
After that, I restarted the "riak" and leave the cluster with th
Hi Amao,
Can you explain a bit more which steps you've taken, and what the problem
is?
Which nodes have been added, and which nodes are leaving the cluster?
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Changmao.Wang
wrote:
> Hi Raik user group,
>
> I'm using riak and riak-cs 1.4.2. Last weekend, I added
When I try this in Erlang:(saving a new Map object to a bucket through )
Map = riakc_map:new(),
Map1 = riakc_map:update({<<"published_b">>, flag},
fun(F) -> riakc_flag:disable(F) end, Map);
I got context_required. How could I create a false flag? I tried ena
Hi,
It’s a long story.
The short answer is: you can’t with that client, it has strong opinions so the
best thing to do is this: have your app interpret the absence of a flag as
false (the bottom/default value for a flag.)
The long story: the semantic for the flag is “observed remove” or “add-wi
Ok, I think I understand so far. So what's the question?
On Thursday, August 6, 2015, Changmao.Wang
wrote:
> Hi Riak users,
>
> Before adding new nodes, the cluster only have five nodes. The member list
> are as below:
> 10.21.136.66,10.21.136.71,10.21.136.76,10.21.136.81,10.21.136.86.
> We did
12 matches
Mail list logo
