I have a cluster of RHEL 6 test servers currently running 1.4.10. I'd like
to install 2.0.2 on these servers along side of 1.4.10, without building
from source. I need the ability to switch between both while testing our
application with the latest Riak. Both versions do not need to be running
at
.value = 1
stats.stat2.name = stat2, stats.stat2.group = x, stats.stat2.value = 5
As far as indexing is concerned, would this be the same as {stats:
{stat1: {...}, stat2: {...}} ?
Andrew
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote:
That would be ideal I know
?
And the query would be something like
Stats_name = stat1 and stats_value 1
I think the extractor flattens everything and separates with underscores.
-Alexander
@siculars
http://siculars.posthaven.com
Sent from my iRotaryPhone
On Oct 25, 2014, at 22:53, Andrew Zeneski
from my iRotaryPhone
On Oct 26, 2014, at 10:43, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote:
Yes right, I was tired when I typed this; stats should be an array:
{id: 1, stats: [{ name: stat1, value: 1 }, {name: stat2,
value: 5}]}
{id: 2, stats: [{ name: stat3, value: 2 }, {name: stat1
Hi All, I'm trying to determine if a use case is supported by Yokozuna or
not.
With a stored value that looks like:
{id: 1, stats: { name: stat1, value: 1 }, {name: stat2,
value: 5}}
{id: 2, stats: { name: stat3, value: 2 }, {name: stat1,
value: 3}}
{id: 3, stats: { name: stat2, value: 3 },
Been checking out 2.0rc1 and am really excited about the new features (as I
think most of us are). I had a couple of questions that I couldn't find
answers to scanning the docs. Totally possible I missed it and if so,
please feel free to direct me to the proper place.
1. Is there a way to remove
...@zinascii.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote:
Been checking out 2.0rc1 and am really excited about the new features (as
I think most of us are). I had a couple of questions that I couldn't find
answers to scanning the docs. Totally possible I
I'm seeing this in my crash log, can anyone help me understand what it
means?
2014-07-17 17:21:20 =ERROR REPORT
Error in process 0.11353.4454 on node 'riak@x.x.x.x' with exit value:
No more OS X builds?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Tom Santero tsant...@basho.com wrote:
Hello Riak Users,
The Basho Team is happy to release Riak 2.0.0-beta1. The source tarball
and pre-built packages are available for download [0]. Note that we've
added support for FreeBSD 10, and
timeout on that
package upload and I didn't notice it. Sorry, it will be fixed shortly. -Jared
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote: No more OS X builds? On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Tom Santero
tsant...@basho.com wrote: Hello Riak Users
I am seeing an error when the search pre-commit hook runs on Linux (RHEL 6, RPM
install)
{hook_crashed,
{riak_search_kv_hook,precommit,error,
{badmatch,...
On OS X 10.8 (running the downloaded tarball) the exact same process works
fine, as it did with 1.2.
Trying to
I was told R15B1
Andrew
On Jul 13, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Jeremy Ong wrote:
Hi,
looks awesome, which Erlang release is the recommended one for building this?
jeremy
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Gordon Tillman gtill...@mezeo.com wrote:
Jared this is great news. There are some
I am seeing some odd behavior from the PBC Search API. When the search results
get to be a certain size and the size changes depending on the client's
location (over GB ethernet its around 14.5MB when I VPN in it appears to be
much less; but I'll confirm that later) the returned byte array
That should have been 14.5KB not MB.
Andrew
On Jul 5, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com wrote:
I am seeing some odd behavior from the PBC Search API. When the search
results get to be a certain size and the size changes depending on the
client's location (over GB
I built the 1.2.0pre3 (and master) and now have secondary index lookups working
in my client api; I am testing search right now but getting errors; is
RpbSearchQueryReq (PBC) implemented in 1.2?
Thanks!
Andrew
On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
Thanks Sean,
Indeed
, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote:
I built the 1.2.0pre3 (and master) and now have secondary index lookups
working in my client api; I am testing search right now but getting errors;
is RpbSearchQueryReq (PBC) implemented in 1.2?
Thanks!
Andrew
On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:26 PM
Sean,
What I am doing is very simple:
1. I install the precommit hook on my test bucket (bin/search-cmd install test)
2. I create a JSON object that looks like this {name: Andrew Zeneski} and
store it in Riak (using my API and the key 1000)
3. I create a RpbSearchQueryReq message, set ONLY
tracker in the meantime? Here's the link:
https://github.com/basho/riak_search/issues
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote:
Sean,
What I am doing is very simple:
1. I install the precommit hook on my test bucket (bin/search-cmd install
test)
2. I
29, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Thank you!
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote:
https://github.com/basho/riak_search/issues/118
On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Andrew,
Thanks for the details. It looks like a breakage
I am working on a new protocol buffer based client using the master riak_pb
repository. I would just like to inquire on the state of riak_kv with the
latest pb, specifically is RpbIndexReq and RpbSearchQueryReq implemented yet (I
know it is not in 1.1.4), if not is there a road map or any idea
application, be aware that they may not be
supported on the server yet (in fact, 1.1 and earlier will likely dump the
connection).
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Andrew Zeneski and...@andrewzeneski.com
wrote:
I am working on a new protocol buffer based client using the master riak_pb
21 matches
Mail list logo
