Joe
On 15/03/2023 12:38, Joe Abley wrote:
Making the amount of funding clear and known before people are asked to
throw their hats in the ring makes it more likely that people will feel
comfortable accepting nominations.
I think this actually addressed in the document by making it clear that
Hi Niall, all,
During the last (and first) process for appointing people to the roles of RIPE
Chair and Vice-Chair, I remember a slightly different concern being voiced than
those that are addressed in this document. I thought I would mention it.
The pool of highly-qualified candidates for thes
Dear friends,
Thanks to all of you who took time to read the draft which I sent last
week,
and especially to everyone who reacted or suggested changes, either
privately
or via the RIPE Discussion List.
Please see below, and attached as PDF, a revised draft, in which we have
- identified the
On 15/03/2023 10:08, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote:
On 14 Mar 2023, at 17:59, Nigel Titley via ripe-list wrote:
Having said that, it may well be that continuing to accept that the RIPE NCC
continues to employ the RIPE Chair(s) is the only workable solution.
Would it be any better if the
> On 14 Mar 2023, at 17:59, Nigel Titley via ripe-list
> wrote:
>
> Having said that, it may well be that continuing to accept that the RIPE NCC
> continues to employ the RIPE Chair(s) is the only workable solution.
>
Would it be any better if the RIPE Chair was remunerated out of funding
On 07/03/2023 16:40, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Dear friends,
After much unexpected delay, I am at last ready to ask you to read and
comment on this DRAFT statement of principles for remuneration of the
RIPE Chairs, which follows from a recommendation of the RIPE 2020
Nominating Committee.
As you
Ladies and gentlemen
On 14/03/2023 15:14, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
Kurtis,colleagues,
this is indeedone of the scenarios where the remuneration
arrangementwouldnot work.We should not put a specific way to deal with
situations like this in the document because we cannot foresee the
details of
