[SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-20 Thread liffy99
All my library is in FLAC at the moment. Works fine with my Vortexbox server. But given the virtually non-existent portability of FLAC files to mobile devices (esp the car) I'm thinking of converting to Apple Lossless. At the moment I'm forced to maintain a duplicate MP3 library for this purpose (

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-20 Thread Mnyb
native would mean that the player can play the format, otherwise the server have to transcode. some formats are played directly on the player and some needs help by the server, wich formats depends on wich player you have. Touch has some native alac being implemented but it is buggy so it's turned

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-20 Thread maggior
You have a lot of company - many of use maintain 2 libraries; 1 for use with the squeezebox (FLAC) and one for portable usage (mp3). With cheap multi-terabyte drives available both for serer use and backup (external drives), the storage issue of maintaining a seperate lossy library is less of an

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-20 Thread rayman1701
I've used ALAC since I got my Touch just over a year ago. I've never had any real issues with doing so, although I do use a laptop for a server, so I've got plenty of computing power for transcoding. And yes I have vinyl rips as well as DVD-A rips in 96/24 and never had a problem (although I have

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-20 Thread Tony T
Sounds like you're on a Mac. If so, I have an Applescript that can convert FLAC to iTunes (you have a choice of a "lossless", "aac", "aiff", "mp3", or "wav"). You can send the output directly to iTunes or to a directory. If interested, see: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showt

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-21 Thread aubuti
liffy99;632386 Wrote: > All my library is in FLAC at the moment. Works fine with my Vortexbox > server. But given the virtually non-existent portability of FLAC files > to mobile devices (esp the car) I'm thinking of converting to Apple > Lossless. Mobile support for FLAC isn't mainstream, but i

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-21 Thread garym
aubuti;632499 Wrote: > > Sorry to stray off-topic, but this one currently interests me. I got > rid of iTunes several years ago, but then had to bring it back recently > after buying an iPod touch (primarily to control my SBs, but secondarily > as a portable player playing my MP3 copies). When I

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-21 Thread mfw
Another way to automatically add to iTunes is to place the folders containing the files you want to add into a folder created by iTunes named "automatically add to iTunes" or something like that, found under the folder "iTunes media". I always do this without iTunes running, so I don't know how i

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-21 Thread aubuti
garym;632508 Wrote: > When in itunes, simply click on FILE > ADD FOLDER TO LIBRARY and select > the top directory (i.e., D:\mp3duplicates) as the one you want to add. > Itunes will skip over (not re-add) the files/subdirectories that have > already been added. okay, thanks. I had vague memories

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-21 Thread maggior
No, you remember correctly. iTunes used to create duplicates. I'll have to try this with my library and see how it goes. -- maggior Rich - Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch, iPeng on iPod Touch. SuSE 11.0 Server running SqueezeBoxServer 7.5.0, MusicIP, and SqueezeS

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-21 Thread garym
maggior;632586 Wrote: > No, you remember correctly. iTunes used to create duplicates. I'll > have to try this with my library and see how it goes. h, haven't done this step in a while, but I've used itunes since about 97 or 98 and was always able to use this approach (probably weekly back

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-21 Thread Wirrunna
aubuti;632499 Wrote: > > Sorry to stray off-topic, but this one currently interests me. I got > rid of iTunes several years ago, but then had to bring it back recently > after buying an iPod touch (primarily to control my SBs, but secondarily > as a portable player playing my MP3 copies). When I

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-22 Thread slate
aubuti;632499 Wrote: > Mobile support for FLAC isn't mainstream, but it's hardly non-existent. > Rockbox (free alternative firmware) works on many players, and it > supports FLAC. There are also some players (Cowan?) with support for > FLAC in the stock software Actually Cowon and Sandisk have s

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-22 Thread aubuti
Saying that SanDisk has supported FLAC and large SDHC cards for years is a little too sweeping. For example, my SanDisk Sansa did not support either FLAC or large SD cards out of the box -- I had to install Rockbox to get those features. On the other hand, SanDisk does support replacing their firm

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-22 Thread moley6knipe
My experience: I use apple lossless, itunes, SB3/Boom and an iPhone I use iTunes to manage all media (any new rips I add to the "Auto add to iTunes" folder, but mostly I use iTunes store for new stuff coz it's a damn sight easier) SBS keeps itself in sync with iTunes Itunes transcodes stuff to

Re: [SlimDevices: Ripping] FLAC or Apple Lossless ?

2011-05-22 Thread slate
aubuti;632620 Wrote: > Saying that SanDisk has supported FLAC and large SDHC cards for years is > a little too sweeping. For example, my SanDisk Sansa did not support > either FLAC or large SD cards out of the box -- I had to install > Rockbox to get those features. On the other hand, SanDisk doe