On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Cowboy c...@cwf1.com wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 07:43:14 am Frederick Gleason wrote:
Because it’s ‘new’ and ‘advanced’, which means that it must be ‘better’?
Yes, but so were/are Microsoft Bob, Spam, and Asbestos.
1. Don't mess with Bob... he can
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 10:29:34 pm Jay Ashworth wrote:
Now I love Fred even more and want to have his babies. :-)
No you don't.
I've seen some of them.
ducking and covering
:):):)
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 07:43:14 am Frederick Gleason wrote:
Because it’s ‘new’ and ‘advanced’,
On Jun 16, 2015, at 22:37 29, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
systemd isn't from Darwin, it's from everyone's favorite pseudo-designer,
Lennart Poettering, he of ... pulse audio.
Ugh. That tells me everything I need to know...
And what I *cannot* understand is how distro Release
Mobile devices will be the death of us all, I suspect. First I hear that
Microsoft went and turned Windows 7 into Windows 8 because of them; then I
discovered the same disease infecting Linux in the form of Gnome 3.
Rob
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Wayne Merricks wrote:
As far as I can tell one
On Jun 17, 2015, at 09:45 15, Rob Landry 41001...@interpring.com wrote:
First I hear that Microsoft went and turned Windows 7 into Windows 8 because
of them; then I discovered the same disease infecting Linux in the form of
Gnome 3.
Don’t get me started. It’s the ‘We wanna be just like
Looks like LXDE is now called LXQt, a combo of the GTK+ and Qt5 versions of
the project. ldxe.org is dead; lxqt.org is alive.
Other than already having Qt installed, would LXQt have any advantages for
the (future) adoption of a more recent version of Qt in Rivendell?
++hobbitt
On Wed, Jun 17,
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Gleason fr...@paravelsystems.com
Every web service in Rivendell (list available at
https://github.com/ElvishArtisan/rivendell/blob/master/docs/web_api.odt)
has a corresponding test harness. Their official reason for being is
as tools for
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Gleason fr...@paravelsystems.com
This same ‘systemd’ misery is now included with RHEL 7 as well. It
originated from Apple, where it has been part of OS X/Darwin for some
time. Mercifully though, on RHEL 7 the legacy service(8) commands
still work
On Jun 13, 2015, at 17:51 03, David Klann dxkl...@gmail.com wrote:
But Fred, I take exception to your claim that the systemd unit file
is more complex than the old init.d scripts. Why do you say that? On
the laptop where I'm typing this the graphical display startup file
for systemd is much
Hi,
Am 2015-06-12 um 22:41 schrieb Rob Landry:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Christian Pointner wrote:
Same for debian, you just need to add something like:
snip
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
/snip
At the beginning of your old initscript and everything will work as
expected.
Which script? Do you
On Jun 11, 2015, at 22:35 22, Rob Landry 41001...@interpring.com wrote:
My gut tells me the problem has something to do with Debian 8 using Apache
2.4 instead of Debian 7's Apache 2.2. Might there be something in the
rd-bin.conf that needs to be changed, or one of the other configuration
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Christian Pointner wrote:
On Jun 12, 2015, at 11:16 43, Rob Landry 41001...@interpring.com wrote:
Debian 8 won't start the Rivendell daemons at boot; it runs something
called systemd that seems to want to start everything at the same time
instead of in their proper
On Jun 12, 2015, at 13:06 01, Christian Pointner equi...@helsinki.at wrote:
Same for debian, you just need to add something like:
snip
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
/snip
At the beginning of your old initscript and everything will work as
expected.
Has been there for ages (at least since
On Jun 12, 2015, at 16:49 45, Rob Landry 41001...@interpring.com wrote:
The old System V init mechanism works fine; why mess with it?
From “The Upstart Intro, Cookbook and Best Practices” guide, section 3.1.2.1.1
[http://upstart.ubuntu.com/cookbook/upstart_cookbook.pdf]:
*** snip snip ***
In
To Ubuntu's credit I really liked upstarts ability to recover from
crashes and start/stop/restart services based on whatever crashed.
Although I must admit that other than the time I sat there kill'ing
processes to test the upstart scripts, the stuff I was using never
crashed anyway.
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Frederick Gleason wrote:
http://localhost/rd-bin/listcarts.html
The output of that query appears to be a copy of rdxport.cgi.
Apache isn't letting it execute for some reason. Hmm...
Rob
___
Rivendell-dev mailing
Nope, the rd-bin.conf file was in the correct location.
The problem was that CGI is not enabled by default on Apache under Debian
8. The symbolic link from mods-available/cgi.load to mods-enabled is
missing. Whether this is supposed to be a bug or a feature is anyone's
guess.
Debian 8
Fred, thanks for your help.
Rob
___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
On Jun 12, 2015, at 11:16 43, Rob Landry 41001...@interpring.com wrote:
Debian 8 won't start the Rivendell daemons at boot; it runs something called
systemd that seems to want to start everything at the same time instead of in
their proper order.
This same ‘systemd’ misery is now included
Could you managed in the end? I read only now...
You probably need to add to your apache/httpd.conf
LoadModule cgid_module modules/mod_cgid.so
Il giorno ven 12 giu 2015 alle ore 17:44 Frederick Gleason
fr...@paravelsystems.com ha scritto:
On Jun 12, 2015, at 11:16 43, Rob Landry
On Jun 12, 2015, at 12:18 46, Wayne Merricks waynemerri...@thevoiceasia.com
wrote:
Systemd apparently has similar ways of achieving the same thing and it seems
to be the way everything is going now so I should probably get to grips with
it.
The basic idea of the two is similar: services
Hi,
Am 2015-06-12 um 17:43 schrieb Frederick Gleason:
On Jun 12, 2015, at 11:16 43, Rob Landry 41001...@interpring.com wrote:
Debian 8 won't start the Rivendell daemons at boot; it runs something called
systemd that seems to want to start everything at the same time instead of
in their
On Jun 12, 2015, at 10:15 08, Rob Landry 41001...@interpring.com wrote:
Apache isn't letting it execute for some reason. Hmm...
Yup. You'll need to enable ExecCGI and the appropriate handler for the
directory that contains that binary. The configuration snippet generated by
‘./configure’
23 matches
Mail list logo
