>> if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform...
> Broadcast Appliance/CentOS *is* RHE, in all but name and logo.
Just curious, are there any plans/dates of a transition to CentOS6 as
the base?
sjm
___
Rivendell-dev mailing li
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 08:48 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 07:19 AM, Gary wrote:
>
> > if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform
> > like RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer life
> > span would resolve to a more stable platform with grea
It's also worth noting that all Ubuntu LTS releases (12.04, 14.04, etc)
carry a full 5 year support period for both the desktop and server
variants. And there's a new version every two years for those that want to
stay on top of things (as opposed to RHEL/CentOS which only sees major
version update
Hi Gary,
> In the big pic the fast moving revisions of the Linux freeware seems to be a
> deal breaker with many RDD
> installations. Just my perspective... if the RDD developer folk in general
> were to centralize on a platform
> like RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer li
On 07/08/2013 07:19 AM, Gary wrote:
if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform
like RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer life
span would resolve to a more stable platform with greater support. I
believe it is
Actually they have. RD used to be bui
On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:19 24, Gary wrote:
> if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform like
> RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer life span would
> resolve to a more stable platform with greater support.
Broadcast Appliance/CentOS *is* RHE, in all
On Jul 7, 2013, at 16:59 24, Cowboy wrote:
> Aren't all RPM the same ?
> ( compatible at least )
At the file-format level, yes. However, different distros use different
package naming conventions and library versions, effectively making RPMs from
different distros incompatible. It's a crap sh
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Gary wrote:
...so the big picture remains that installation of Rivendell is no
longer my main thorn in my side, but the streaming chain: Jack / Encoder
/ Icecast.
I have darkice and icecast running reliably under a variety of Linux
distributions at several stations, no
Gary
>
> From: Rob Landry <41001...@interpring.com>
>To: G Wood
>Cc: User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System
>
>Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 8:46 AM
>Subject: Re: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell: and a feature
>request
&
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, G Wood wrote:
Your post Fred is helpful. I found this post from the past and thought
I'd try to resurrect it. I am curious about the RDD Broadcast
Appliance, I have downloaded it several times from the Paravel site but
have encountered repeated corrupt installs, errors r
One extra thing to add about the liquidsoap setup on Ubuntu Server.
You can setup triggers to respawn on a crash (via upstart scripts) and
gracefully restart other parts of the chain. During testing I sat there
doing killall liquidsoap, jackd, icecast etc and no matter what I tried
it all came
Hi,
Liquidsoap is the way to go. At the risk of repeating myself I've had
uptime of over 9months (with a local icecast server) which was stopped
by either electricity problems or building moves.
I just spent an entire Saturday using Debian 7, Rivendell with JACK,
Liquidsoap, Rotter and Jami
On 07/07/2013 12:59 PM, Cowboy wrote:
On Sunday 07 July 2013 04:30:55 pm Lorne Tyndale wrote:
As for Suse, I don't know of any current Rivendell pre-built packages.
Isn't SuSE an RPM based distro ?
Yes.
Aren't all RPM the same ?
( compatible at least )
Nope. Just like installing a
On Sunday 07 July 2013 04:30:55 pm Lorne Tyndale wrote:
> As for Suse, I don't know of any current Rivendell pre-built packages.
Isn't SuSE an RPM based distro ?
Aren't all RPM the same ?
( compatible at least )
--
Cowboy
http://cowboy.cwf1.com
"The porcupine with the sharpest quills gets
Hi Gary,
As has been mentioned on this list, Darkice has been found to be
unstable by many users. Most have migrated to Liquidsoap. When
comparing the stability of Liquidsoap to Darkice, it is like night and
day.
As for Suse, I don't know of any current Rivendell pre-built packages.
Have you t
Your post Fred is helpful. I found this post from the past and thought I'd
try to resurrect it. I am curious about the RDD Broadcast Appliance, I
have downloaded it several times from the Paravel site but have encountered
repeated corrupt installs, errors referring to a kernel panic and other
low
On Aug 6, 2012, at 11:33 59, Nathan Steele wrote:
> Anyway use what you want, but FRED, Please don't ditch CEntOS.
No worries, it's here to stay. I've actually got some CentOS 6 boxes on the
air for testing at selected sites now. Very solid system, with *much* better
support for touchscreens
On Aug 5, 2012, at 08:35 02, Rob Landry wrote:
> My decision to try CentOS was driven by the idea that if Mr. Gleason is
> using it, then the glitches will have already cropped up in the course of
> his development work, so I should encounter fewer of them.
It all depends on your overall goals
s.rivendellaudio.org
Subject: Re: [RDD] arrrrgh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rrabuntu/
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 07:43 -0400, Rob Landry wrote:
> Cool. Where can I find it?
>
___
Rivendell-dev
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rrabuntu/
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 07:43 -0400, Rob Landry wrote:
> Cool. Where can I find it?
>
___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/riven
It was never my intent to ask anyone to ditch CentOS!
I write from the perspective of a user who likes Rivendell a lot, wants to
use it as a tool to do the work of getting our content to our transmitter,
etc. and also NOT spend countless hours banging my head against to wall to
do needed tasks on
On Friday 03 August 2012, ICR Programs wrote:
> Ok, I'm sorry to say I think we ought to throw in the towel
> with CentOS and Rivendell. The reason is that nobody around
> here -- we're all volunteers with skills in areas other than
> high level sys admin -- can drive CentOS well enough to do
> thi
I say do what you want but I personally prefer CEntOS. I had no linux
experience before setting up a rivendell based station a little over a
year ago. I started with RRAbuntu, but another station I contract for
was setting upo a paravel systems broadcast appliance install with a
support contrac
Yup, even I was able to do this successfully a few times. So, if I can do
it, anyone can!
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Robert Jeffares
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:46 +1200, Gavin Stephens wrote:
> > Is it easy enought (a few clicks) to import an old 1.7.2 database in
> > to the
> > ap
the sudden need to make sure
> everything is imaged again on a few spare drives.
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To: "User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System"
>
> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 7:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [RDD] agh!!! %
Stephan,
Thanks for your response. It was this very Paravel install that I've just
about given up on. YES it is a relatively easy install, our favorite part
of it was the auto detect on the sound card :-).
My least favorite things about it:
I don't understand it well enough to be in control. I
Cool. Where can I find it?
Rob
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Robert Jeffares wrote:
> yep runs on clunky old laptop
> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 20:59 -0400, Rob Landry wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Robert Jeffares wrote:
>>
>>> There is a Debian/Ubuntu Appliance
>>
>> Will it run on 32-bit hardware?
>>
>
Barkman"
To: "User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System"
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
> But copying a decent size /var/snd directory could take a few hours to
> copy ... especially if the fi
Thanks Rob.
Might start shopping for some used 64-bit hardware, maybe IBM's on Trade Me.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Jeffares"
To: "User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System"
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [RDD]
yep runs on clunky old laptop
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 20:59 -0400, Rob Landry wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Robert Jeffares wrote:
>
> > There is a Debian/Ubuntu Appliance
>
> Will it run on 32-bit hardware?
>
>
> Rob
> ___
> Rivendell-dev mailing lis
But copying a decent size /var/snd directory could take a few hours to
copy ... especially if the files are still pcm wave from an old
Rivendell setup
Cheers
Geoff
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Robert Jeffares
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:46 +1200, Gavin Stephens wrote:
>> Is it easy enoug
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:46 +1200, Gavin Stephens wrote:
> Is it easy enought (a few clicks) to import an old 1.7.2 database in
> to the
> appliance?
>
>
Yes
rdadmin>Backup DB on 1.7.2 to somewhere
Make new install
Copy /var/snd/ to /var/snd/
rdadmin>Restore DB from somewhere
You may have to
iscussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System"
Cc: "User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System"
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
> It is very easy, the hard part for me was understanding y
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Robert Jeffares wrote:
> There is a Debian/Ubuntu Appliance
Will it run on 32-bit hardware?
Rob
___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
perfer a firewall. I use a
> Mikrotik router for that, few watts vs 50W PC pfsense, although pfsense runs
> well too.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Jeffares"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 2:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- Ce
uot;Robert Jeffares"
To:
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 2:52 AM
Subject: Re: [RDD] arrrrgh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 21:07 +1200, Gavin Stephens wrote:
>> a
>> new OS with even bigger learning curves to compile rather than install
>> from
&
@lists.rivendellaudio.org
Subject: Re: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 21:07 +1200, Gavin Stephens wrote:
> a
> new OS with even bigger learning curves to compile rather than install
> from
> an RPM on the old system.
as a user who has compiled Rivendell, and
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 21:07 +1200, Gavin Stephens wrote:
> a
> new OS with even bigger learning curves to compile rather than install
> from
> an RPM on the old system.
as a user who has compiled Rivendell, and other things, on various OS
since 1999, some of which no longer exist, the appliance
: rivendell-dev-boun...@lists.rivendellaudio.org on behalf of Rob Landry
Sent: Sun 05/08/2012 13:35
To: User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System
Subject: Re: [RDD] arrrrgh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Gavin Stephens wrote:
> I know Rivendell is sopose to be cro
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Gavin Stephens wrote:
> I know Rivendell is sopose to be cross-linux platforms, but it never really
> appears that easy in the posts. I feel the sudden need to make sure
> everything is imaged again on a few spare drives.
Compiling Rivendell on any distribution of Linux requ
sts. I feel the sudden need to make sure
everything is imaged again on a few spare drives.
- Original Message -
From:
To: "User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System"
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [RDD] arrrrgh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendel
The Paravel install disk are on CentOS5. Very easy install, runs well. The
only thing is that the RN RML-command does not work...
Cheers, Stephan
> Ok, I'm sorry to say I think we ought to throw in the towel with CentOS
> and
> Rivendell. The reason is that nobody around here -- we're all volunte
I always compile Rivendell from source; that way, I know what options it's
built with and it's optimized for the hardware it will be running on.
It took me two days of head-banging to get Rivendell running on CentOS
6.2. I'm used to Debian, which makes a lot more of the prerequisites
available
here are repos for Debian/Ubuntu so you can just add those to your apt
>>> sources and do an apt-get install rivendell (I normally compile from source
>>> so I've probably butchered the package names).
>>>
>>> http://debian.tryphon.eu/ for more info.
>>>
>
gt;
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: rivendell-dev-boun...@lists.rivendellaudio.org on behalf of ICR
>> Programs
>> Sent: Fri 03/08/2012 23:39
>> To: User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System
>> Subject: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- Cen
bout the Rivendell Radio Automation System
> Subject: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
>
> Ok, I'm sorry to say I think we ought to throw in the towel with CentOS and
> Rivendell. The reason is that nobody around here -- we're all volunteers
> with skills in areas other
t; To: User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System
> Subject: [RDD] agh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
>
> Ok, I'm sorry to say I think we ought to throw in the towel with CentOS and
> Rivendell. The reason is that nobody around here -- we're all voluntee
-boun...@lists.rivendellaudio.org on behalf of ICR Programs
Sent: Fri 03/08/2012 23:39
To: User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System
Subject: [RDD] arrrrgh!!! % # -- CentOS and Rivendell
Ok, I'm sorry to say I think we ought to throw in the towel with CentOS and
Rivendell. The
Ok, I'm sorry to say I think we ought to throw in the towel with CentOS and
Rivendell. The reason is that nobody around here -- we're all volunteers
with skills in areas other than high level sys admin -- can drive CentOS
well enough to do things that we need to do without spending a lot of time
do
49 matches
Mail list logo
