Roy Wallace wrote:
I agree, but I think the goal of this thread is to clarify for some
people exactly how important binary size is, by coming to a
compromise, a consensus, so as to avoid having the same argument
repeatedly on a case by case basis.
Since the original message in this wasn't e
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is also true if X is 'call the binsize card too often'.
>
> Thus, it doesn't matter if we agree on this X or not...
>
I agree, but I think the goal of this thread is to clarify for some people
exactly how important
Marcs layout is good but I don't think goes far enough to fix the problems.
2008/10/30 pondlife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK - some input: - all IMHO:
so without that disclaimer you usually talk in your dishonest opinion? :D
>
> 3) Maybe I'm misunderstanding rows 8-21 but why have the sound settings
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: 2008-10-29 21:21:59 +0100 (Wed, 29 Oct 2008)
> New Revision: 18926
>
> Log Message:
> Embryo of a SD driver for Sansav2
>
> Debug code included, needed until the bootloader is ready
>
> Added:
>trunk/firmware/target/arm/as3525/mmci.h
I
>
>
> Maybe it's time we consider upgrading binutils? That should not bring any
> major issues (tm) and has the added bonus of including amiconn's fix for a
> gas bug hitting coldfire. It is also a requirement for building gcc =< 4.3
> for coldfire (without patches).
>
> nils
>
Forgot to mention t
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Rafaël Carré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is the 2 patches I needed in order to build binutils and gcc with
> rockboxdev.sh
>
> The patch for binutils is needed for correct runtime: arm-elf-ar would
> build but crash because of a buffer overflow.
>
>
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:41 PM, pondlife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5) We already have four ways to see the time - the status bar, the info
> screen, the clock plugin, setting the time. Of these, only the info screen
> currently talks, but I don't see any need for a fifth time/date screen.
>
Hello,
Here is the 2 patches I needed in order to build binutils and gcc with
rockboxdev.sh
The patch for binutils is needed for correct runtime: arm-elf-ar would
build but crash because of a buffer overflow.
--
Rafaël Carré
diff -ru binutils-2.16.1.orig/bfd/archive.c binutils-2.16.1/bfd/archiv
OK - some input: - all IMHO:
1) It would be better if you could document the changes, rather than just a
new layout - evolution not revolution and all that..
2) I'll be happy to see the back of "General Settings" , and the use of
"System" in two places in the menu tree.
3) Maybe I'm misunderst
Hi Jonathan,
I really like the layout that Marc Guay et al have come up in
http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome?topic=MenuLayoutDiscussion.
It's not too radical, but definitely an improvement on what we have IMHO.
It's not that easy to compare with your spreadsheet (which is indee
Joseph, you can remove some of the larger plugins like doom from
apps/plugins/SUBDIRS in your tree to save on compiling time.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Paul Louden wrote:
I'd also like to challenge anyone here to find three features that were
actually rejected with "binary size" being the cause.
And I also would like to remind you all that:
it doesn't matter
Each feature is taken on case by case so just shouting
Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
Let me chime in with my $0.02. I think that the binsize isn't *that*
important for the battery life. If a feature adds 10Kbytes to the
binary, it means 10Kbytes less buffering memory. That is hardly
measurable at all, only a few frames of an MP3 file.
Remember
Paul Louden wrote:
That means less useful features should be considered critically even
if they have small binsize costs, just because they're useful to only
an exceptionally small group. They're a dilution of the total
"usefulness density."
Let me chime in with my $0.02. I think that the binsi
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Paul Louden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This again is a false comparison. The WWW doesn't have resource
> restrictions in the same manner as Rockbox. Assume the internet became
> slower for everyone, the instant any website was put up. Were this the case
> there
15 matches
Mail list logo
