On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Paul Louden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This again is a false comparison. The WWW doesn't have resource > restrictions in the same manner as Rockbox. Assume the internet became > slower for everyone, the instant any website was put up. Were this the case > there would immediately be a concern on the value of having more information > available versus the ability for people to access this information in a > reasonable time frame. Assuming there were a controlling authority, any > website put up would be looked at in terms of "how many people will this > help" versus "how much current, and potentially future, cost will this have > to users who will, and especially who won't, use this feature." > > I'm sorry you feel that I made a "false comparison" - sounds a bit oxymoronic to me. Anyway, we seem to agree that the issue is: "how much current, and potentially future, cost will [the inclusion of a feature] have to users?".
