Has anyone looked at how handhelds.org does (did) their grading system?
Quite elegant, IMHO.
http://handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/HpIpaqH4100
--soap
Rob Purchase wrote :
> > My suggestion would be:
> >
> > Gold - "top tier" ports, as per Dave's email (eg. iArchos, iHP, X5, F/X
> > etc)
> > Silver - mature ports, but with some flaws (eg. iPods, maybe Sansa AMS,
> > etc)
> > Bronze - working ports, but with significant flaws (eg. Gigabeat S, D2,
<4ad37204.2090...@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
> I like Dave's suggestion=2C but maybe we are getting too hung up on the
> implications of the words "usable"=2C "unstable" etc. An idea touted in
>
>
> What I particularly dislike in the current classification is the term
> "unusable", which sounds far too negative IMO. For example the Gigabeat
> S is far from unusable once you get past the hurdle of getting Rockbox
> onto it.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
The S is basically unusable with the i
Rob Purchase a écrit :
> My suggestion would be:
>
> Gold - "top tier" ports, as per Dave's email (eg. iArchos, iHP, X5, F/X
> etc)
> Silver - mature ports, but with some flaws (eg. iPods, maybe Sansa AMS,
> etc)
> Bronze - working ports, but with significant flaws (eg. Gigabeat S, D2,
> m:Robe 50
Tomer Shalev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> For those of you who don't follow SVN traffic, I would like to update you
> that I recently implemented the bi-directional menus feature.
> It is triggered automagically for the Hebrew and Arabic languages.
>
> This feature is considered stable, as there are
On 12/10/2009 11:51, Johannes Linke wrote:
PS: I suggest changing "stable" to "complete" or something else... If
you see stable and usable, you think usable = unstable, but unstable
is often = unusable...
Imo the following classifications would be best:
Complete - well, complete. This port of
Hello all,
For those of you who don't follow SVN traffic, I would like to update you
that I recently implemented the bi-directional menus feature.
It is triggered automagically for the Hebrew and Arabic languages.
I would like to thank the following people who implemented and fixed the
scrolling
Thomas Martitz schrieb:
On 12.10.2009 12:51, Johannes Linke wrote:
PS: I suggest changing "stable" to "complete" or something else... If
you see stable and usable, you think usable = unstable, but unstable
is often = unusable...
Imo the following classifications would be best:
Complete - wel
On 12.10.2009 12:51, Johannes Linke wrote:
PS: I suggest changing "stable" to "complete" or something else... If
you see stable and usable, you think usable = unstable, but unstable
is often = unusable...
Imo the following classifications would be best:
Complete - well, complete. This port of
PS: I suggest changing "stable" to "complete" or something else... If
you see stable and usable, you think usable = unstable, but unstable is
often = unusable...
Imo the following classifications would be best:
Complete - well, complete. This port offers everything Rockbox can offer.
Usable -
Thomas Martitz wrote:
I'm not convinced we need 4. 3) and 4) sound like they could be 1
category (I don't even think targets that would be under your 4) need
to be mentioned at all as classified target). And then we're at the
same classification we have now.
We might consider renaming the
12 matches
Mail list logo
