Re: NoDo or not?

2010-04-01 Thread Peter Lecky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1.4.2010 10:39, Brožík, Václav wrote: > On 3/26/2010 2:53 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: >> I often listen to audiobooks and the like that benefit from being sped >> up. It would be nice for the DAP to not "forget" that I sped up >> playback when I turn

RE: NoDo or not?

2010-04-01 Thread Brožík , Václav
On 3/26/2010 2:53 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: > I often listen to audiobooks and the like that benefit from being sped > up. It would be nice for the DAP to not "forget" that I sped up > playback when I turn it off. I'm probably in the minority though. I am with you. The minority grows up :) I would

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-30 Thread Nils
> I just want a key I can assign on the fly so I don't have to drill down to > context menus all the time.  I don't want user-switchable keymaps.  I don't > want to have to load an entirely new keymap just to change functions.  I > merely want what I want, when I want it. :) > > And I feel this is

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-29 Thread Jeff Goode
On 3/29/2010 05:57, Nils wrote: I would rather see a solution for completely remapping the keys than this scheme with one or a few remappable buttons only. I know this has been argued to death over and over but the only two arguments against it are a) support nightmare b) unwanted complexity a)

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-29 Thread Nils
I would rather see a solution for completely remapping the keys than this scheme with one or a few remappable buttons only. I know this has been argued to death over and over but the only two arguments against it are a) support nightmare b) unwanted complexity a) is easily dealt with by telling us

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-27 Thread Jeff Goode
On 3/26/2010 16:14, Paul Louden wrote: On 3/26/2010 3:11 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: Agree. In fact, all the persistence menu does is let you flag the DAP to *clear* the settings to the defaults on startup. Without that flag, the settings already persist. Yes, but we don't have persistence set

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Jeff Goode
On 3/26/2010 15:57, Paul Louden wrote: On 3/26/2010 2:53 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: I often listen to audiobooks and the like that benefit from being sped up. It would be nice for the DAP to not "forget" that I sped up playback when I turn it off. I'm probably in the minority though. Jeff Per

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Paul Louden
On 3/26/2010 3:11 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: Agree. In fact, all the persistence menu does is let you flag the DAP to *clear* the settings to the defaults on startup. Without that flag, the settings already persist. Yes, but we don't have persistence settings for anything else. There's alread

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Jeff Goode
On 3/26/2010 15:58, Paul Louden wrote: On 3/26/2010 2:08 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: The persistence thing was in response to a note in FlySpray. JdGordon didn't think the settings should carry over. I think they should. This is a compromise so you can have it either way. If an empty button

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Paul Louden
On 3/26/2010 2:08 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: The persistence thing was in response to a note in FlySpray. JdGordon didn't think the settings should carry over. I think they should. This is a compromise so you can have it either way. If an empty button is going to be assigned a role from the co

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Paul Louden
On 3/26/2010 2:53 PM, Jeff Goode wrote: I often listen to audiobooks and the like that benefit from being sped up. It would be nice for the DAP to not "forget" that I sped up playback when I turn it off. I'm probably in the minority though. Jeff Perhaps a sort of hybrid solution - rather

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Jeff Goode
On 3/26/2010 15:36, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 26.03.2010 20:30, schrieb Jeff Goode: On 3/26/2010 15:10, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 26.03.2010 20:08, schrieb Jeff Goode: The persistence thing was in response to a note in FlySpray. JdGordon didn't think the settings should carry over. I think the

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 26.03.2010 20:30, schrieb Jeff Goode: On 3/26/2010 15:10, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 26.03.2010 20:08, schrieb Jeff Goode: The persistence thing was in response to a note in FlySpray. JdGordon didn't think the settings should carry over. I think they should. This is a compromise so you can

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Jeff Goode
On 3/26/2010 11:04, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 26.03.2010 15:54, schrieb Jeff Goode: Hi folks, Let's please come to some sort of consensus: is a user-programmable keypress a NoDo item or not? I have a patch at FS#11081 that's ready to go but I don't want to commit without clearing the air over

Re: NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 26.03.2010 15:54, schrieb Jeff Goode: Hi folks, Let's please come to some sort of consensus: is a user-programmable keypress a NoDo item or not? I have a patch at FS#11081 that's ready to go but I don't want to commit without clearing the air over this issue. Thanks, Jeff I have noth

NoDo or not?

2010-03-26 Thread Jeff Goode
Hi folks, Let's please come to some sort of consensus: is a user-programmable keypress a NoDo item or not? I have a patch at FS#11081 that's ready to go but I don't want to commit without clearing the air over this issue. Thanks, Jeff