Yes. Sorry. You're absolutely right. Firefox really is slimmer and
less memory hungry than ever these days. On another note, eating
McDonald's is good for you so you should do this everyday.
Did I mention that I am the King of England?
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:52:09 +0100
Christoph Thompson wrote
On 25.02.2012 09:38, Adam wrote:
Yes. Sorry. You're absolutely right. Firefox really is slimmer and
less memory hungry than ever these days. On another note, eating
McDonald's is good for you so you should do this everyday.
Did I mention that I am the King of England?
Ehm... Firefox IS less m
That's interesting. On all my Windows systems Firefox 9 and 10 hogs
up almost 1GB of memory (and uses up the pagefile!) for only 5-6 tabs
open. I even reduced the memory cache settings. Not even Firefox 3.x
used to hog so much RAM on any of my systems. Approx. 100-200MB at most
with 15 tabs open. A
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> Ehm... Firefox IS less memory hungry in its current version than before. I
> noticed this on my smaller Windows system, where Firefox used to have
> around 400 MB with around 20 tabs open and now it's down to 200 MB. That
> this is still far fr
Quicker releases have the benefit that it forces us to fix lingering
regressions and release. Otherwise regressions and significant bugs
pile up until release and we have to spend months fixing them.
On 25 February 2012 04:00, Adam wrote:
> "Faster release cycle is better" is what a bunch of idio
I'm sorry, have you tried version 9 or version 10 yet? It's usage is
increasingly high since around version 4. I was hoping it would improve
as well but I'm not seeing it.
And in any case, did any of you read the other bits of my post? What
about the buggy useless features? The UI that keeps freez
The only time I've ever seen this work is with OpenBSD - but that's
because they do a strict six-monthly release schedule, with set periods
of time hacking away, set periods of time testing things, and set
periods of time finalizing the release. Any new features that doesn't
make it into the (I thi
Excuse me being so harsh, but
On 25.02.2012 8:00, Adam wrote:
"Faster release cycle is better" is what a bunch of idiots at Mozilla
Corporation said.
... and another idiot is trying to argue.
Moral of the story is that one needs to have some background knowledge
and experience to state somet
My opinion about this:
There is a difference between a project that is in use (like Firefox)
and a proejct that has no use except showing how far it is.
For a project that is in use, there is a benefit from a shorter release
cycle (as long as it's done thoroughly), due to the fact that users
d
[USER32]
Correct user32 japanese translation (and fix build as well)
For the record, this doesn't fix build because:
1) It was not broken (hint: r55860).
2) The module that broke build back then was shell32, not user32.
Regards,
Amine.
___
Ros-dev mai
Feel free to revert.
At least, this removes an error message.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
