Re: [ros-dev] [FREELDR]: Some ARM architectures do not necessarily have CS0_BASE at 0x00000000...

2011-08-06 Thread Igor Paliychuk
Fixed in 53085 2011/8/2 Igor Paliychuk mansoni...@gmail.com Commit http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?view=revrevision=52098 by Sir Richard caused the regression http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6292 that is marked as blocker. I have reverted this commit (and applied hachfix

[ros-dev] [FREELDR]: Some ARM architectures do not necessarily have CS0_BASE at 0x00000000...

2011-08-02 Thread Igor Paliychuk
Commit http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?view=revrevision=52098 by Sir Richard caused the regression http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6292 that is marked as blocker. I have reverted this commit (and applied hachfix for driver setup fixing) and now ReactOS boots and sound is ok.

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-20 Thread Alex Ionescu
. -Original Message- From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Alex Ionescu Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:27 AM To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] freeldr I wrote this exact same request 3 years ago and Brian said no :) Best

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-20 Thread Alex Ionescu
-dev] freeldr I wrote this exact same request 3 years ago and Brian said no :) Best regards, Alex Ionescu On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de wrote: Hi, I'd like to change the Vtbl based architecture of freeldr into a normal function call system. Currently

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-20 Thread Brian Palmer
in the process. -Original Message- From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Alex Ionescu Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:54 AM To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] freeldr I googled for Alex Ionescu and Brian Palmer. First link: http

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-20 Thread Alex Ionescu
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] freeldr I googled for Alex Ionescu and Brian Palmer. First link: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2005-November/006155.html. Best regards, Alex Ionescu On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Brian Palmer bri...@sginet.com wrote: Again, please cite your sources

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-19 Thread Alex Ionescu
I wrote this exact same request 3 years ago and Brian said no :) Best regards, Alex Ionescu On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de wrote: Hi, I'd like to change the Vtbl based architecture of freeldr into a normal function call system. Currently we have stuff

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-19 Thread Aleksey Bragin
What about those functions which do change? WBR, Aleksey. On Jun 19, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote: Hi, I'd like to change the Vtbl based architecture of freeldr into a normal function call system. Currently we have stuff like #define MachHwDetect()

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-19 Thread Timo Kreuzer
Am 19.06.2011 21:55, schrieb Aleksey Bragin: What about those functions which do change? What functions do change? Its compiled for one achitecture explicitly. we don't need to support arm, when we compile for x86. Or am I missing something? ___

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-19 Thread Rafał H
Dnia 19-06-2011 o 22:28:04 Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de napisał(a): Am 19.06.2011 21:55, schrieb Aleksey Bragin: What about those functions which do change? What functions do change? Its compiled for one achitecture explicitly. we don't need to support arm, when we compile for x86. Or

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-19 Thread Alex Ionescu
The only thing it would be useful for is on ARM, to build one FreeLDR for all SoCs -- but I think right know it's built per-SOC anyway, so the VTABLE is useless. Best regards, Alex Ionescu 2011/6/19 Rafał H rafalh1...@o2.pl: Dnia 19-06-2011 o 22:28:04 Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-15 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 15-6-2011 7:17, Ameen Ross schreef: Most Linux distros nowadays can boot from ISO. Even with persistent changes. ah so you're claiming something like this would work out of the box: label ubuntu1104 kernel memdisk append iso initrd=ubuntu.iso To my knowledge, Linux ISO booting consisted

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-15 Thread Ameen Ross
ah so you're claiming something like this would work out of the box: label ubuntu1104 kernel memdisk append iso initrd=ubuntu.iso This is one entry from my multiboot USB drive's GRUB menu: title Ubuntu Netinstall x86 find --set-root /iso/ubuntunetinstall.iso.gz map --mem

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-15 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 15-6-2011 19:56, Ameen Ross schreef: ah you're using GRUB with some of its internal commands, seems like you're quite right, be it due to GRUB, Ubuntu or the combination. Thanks for your response. I suggest we'll continue this thread sometime once ReactOS has the same capabilities of

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-14 Thread Ameen Ross
Most Linux distros nowadays can boot from ISO. Even with persistent changes. On 06/15/2011 12:43 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote: A working implementation of loading/mounting a ISO9660 image file, despite protected mode, is Parted Magic (Linux based). ___

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-13 Thread Timo Kreuzer
Am 13.06.2011 00:40, schrieb Bernd Blaauw: http://reboot.pro/14412/ lists a modified FreeLDR (for PXE?) and CHAIN.C32 (Syslinux multiboot bootloader module). I'd hope ReactOS can be booted from (FreeLDR on) all of the following (ofcourse 1 step at a time at implementation) : * harddisk

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-13 Thread Brian Palmer
support? -Original Message- From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Alex Ionescu Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:19 AM To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] freeldr Last time I tried to do this Brian Palmer went ape-shit :) Best

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-12 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 10-6-2011 16:13, Timo Kreuzer schreef: Any remarks, objections, wishes, doubts? http://reboot.pro/14412/ lists a modified FreeLDR (for PXE?) and CHAIN.C32 (Syslinux multiboot bootloader module). I'd hope ReactOS can be booted from (FreeLDR on) all of the following (ofcourse 1 step at a

[ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-10 Thread Timo Kreuzer
Hi, While taking a short break from my GSOC work, I like to do some work on freeldr. Final goal is to make it work with MSVC, but first I'd like to do a little cleanup, since its a bit messy. First I'd like to know how the state of the old bootcode is and if we still need it and whats left

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

2011-06-10 Thread Alex Ionescu
Last time I tried to do this Brian Palmer went ape-shit :) Best regards, Alex Ionescu On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de wrote: Hi, While taking a short break from my GSOC work, I like to do some work on freeldr. Final goal is to make it work with MSVC, but

Re: [ros-dev] [freeldr] Add PXE filesystem (Ged Murphy)

2011-05-05 Thread Aleksey Bragin
. From: Love Nystrom Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 8:40 PM To: ros-dev@reactos.org Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [freeldr] Add PXE filesystem (Ged Murphy) Hi Ged, Yes of course I read Hervé's mail. I did not suggest that he should go about porting existing code, I just expressed my opinion that we

Re: [ros-dev] [freeldr] Add PXE filesystem (Ged Murphy)

2011-05-05 Thread Timo Kreuzer
Ok, sorry for not acknowledging the PXE code. Great work Hervé. Sorry for nitpicking, but for me its similar to writing new C code that uses gcc extensions (or gnu style indentation :)). We are in the process of supporting MSVC builds, so we should start to get some kind of compiler

Re: [ros-dev] [freeldr] Add PXE filesystem

2011-05-03 Thread Timo Kreuzer
yes yes, I'm going to do it. But please don't cause even more work for me. For the future: DO NOT USE ATT SYNTAX FOR NEW ASM CODE! Thanks. ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr as PE file

2010-07-20 Thread Timo Kreuzer
Brian Palmer schrieb: IIRC, there is currently some extra boot code prepended to the beginning of the FreeLoader binary to assist the bootsector on certain file systems. Does converting to PE format cause any problems for this? Yes, you are right, this might cause problems. I'll look into

[ros-dev] freeldr as PE file

2010-07-17 Thread Timo Kreuzer
Hi I'd like to propose a small change: converting freeldr into a PE file. The current freeldr / setupldr are raw binaries, which makes them easy to handle for the bootsector but it disqualifies them from proper debugging with gdb. A solution is to convert them into PE format. As there is no