On Jan 29, 2008 10:32 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/29/08, Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you happen to know if RDBO will tolerate a
DBIx::ContextualFetch based DBI handle?
It should, and if it doesn't, I can probably make it do so with some
minor edits. Give of
On Jan 29, 2008 9:55 PM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just a naive guess here, but if you were using DBI-connect_cached as the
underlying connect method, wouldn't DBI handle the sharing for you?
No, I'm pretty sure DBI uses the class as part of the connect_cached key.
-sam
Hey all. I'm getting started with Rose::DB::Object. My problem is I need
to inter-operate with a large pre-existing Class::DBI code-base. I'd like
to setup Rose to be able to share the same DBI connection that Class::DBI
uses - otherwise I'll instantly double the number of connections from our
On Jan 29, 2008 10:06 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The db atribute of an RDBO-derived object isa Rose::DB, but each
Rose::DB-derived object has a DBI $dbh. IOW, plain old DBI database
handles are used via delegation in RDBO. There's no subclassing of
DBI classes at all.
On Jan 29, 2008 9:57 PM, Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 9:55 PM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just a naive guess here, but if you were using DBI-connect_cached as the
underlying connect method, wouldn't DBI handle the sharing for you?
No, I'm pretty sure DBI
On 1/29/08, Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you happen to know if RDBO will tolerate a
DBIx::ContextualFetch based DBI handle?
It should, and if it doesn't, I can probably make it do so with some
minor edits. Give of a try and let me know.
-John
