On Tuesday 20 June 2006 23:37, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
>
> I hope you at least eat cheese. Please tell me you eat cheese.
Of course I do :-). Love it, actually.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
___
Rosegarden-devel mailing lis
On Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:32, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> Instruments as attributes of the SEGMENTS... Now that has some fascinating
> potential to solve all the problems in the rant I just deleted when I made
> it to that part of your argument. With a track-level parameter to set up
> Revision: 7318
> Author: cannam
> Date: 2006-06-19 06:30:27 -0700 (Mon, 19 Jun 2006)
> ViewCVS: http://svn.sourceforge.net/rosegarden/?rev=7318&view=rev
[...]
> Modified: trunk/rosegarden/gui/rosegardengui.cpp
> +#include
There is also a KTabWidget control from KDE (ktabwidget.h). Did y
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 4:11 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > Sniff.
>
> Rosegarden : the project which makes a grown man cry.
Hell yeah. I'll drink to that. Orange juice, with a nod toward my French
friend who neither smokes nor drinks wine.
I hope you at least eat cheese. Please tell me yo
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 4:04 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> On the other hand, I find some features related to Instruments very poor or
> even wrong. For instance: why the MIDI channel is an attribute of the
> Instrument? why the Instruments are attributes of the tracks instead of the
> segme
On Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:18, Luis Garrido wrote:
> I thought I was clear in my suggestions but, sure, find here a mock-up of
> them.
>
> http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/8f2842da2c.png
I agree with a narrower layout. I don't like the white text on black
backgroud. I prefer the tabbed solutio
- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [Rosegarden-user] recording hardware synth sounds
Gesendet: Sa 17 Jun 2006 17:19:31 CEST
Von: "D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Friday 16 June 2006 8:41 pm, you wrote:
>
> > I can play GM sounds from my keyboard with rosegarden
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 17:55, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:40 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > Actually no, as I said I was afraid he'd use an empty QLabel. I don't
> > recall of any specific troubles with QSpacerItem.
>
> Hah. You don't remember flaying me up
On Monday, 19 June 2006 18:32, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Saturday 17 Jun 2006 16:19, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> > If we ignore program changes that do not have names associated with them
>
> Actually if my reading of the code is right, it's less subtle than that.
> We ignore program chan
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:14 pm, Nicholas Bailey wrote:
> different note and the graph tells you you're wrong. This is mostly
> because it's aimed at conservatory standard musicians, and these guys'
> sight reading is beyond belief. They read music like I read English.
I can well imagine. If yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Jun 2006, at 4:45 pm, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> ...
> They play into the microphone, and it compares their timing,
> intonation, and
> gross pitch against a baseline, reporting results, and giving them a
> score
> for how well the
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:40 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Actually no, as I said I was afraid he'd use an empty QLabel. I don't
> recall of any specific troubles with QSpacerItem.
Hah. You don't remember flaying me up one side and down the other for using
spacers? I do.
The archives aren't
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 7:29 am, Nick Bailey wrote:
> Well, this isn't really a project about Rosegarden, it's a project about
> microtonality as you correctly surmised. But it is a project that /uses/
> Rosegarden.
Ach, I feel so *used*.
> Of course, the open source way is to release this work
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> No, Martin, Guillaume was afraid you had used QSpacerItems because that's
> what
> I and probably Stephen Torri did, when we (or at least I) learned bad things
> about QT layout from playing with QT Designer.
Actually no, as I said I was afraid he'd use an e
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 8:24 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> I'm not sure, I was certain that I had seen this pretty often, but I
> can't seem to find a good example :-). May be it's not so standard after
> all, so leave your change in.
Like I was saying earlier, this *used* to be common KDE idiom
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 6:02 am, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> I have also taken the
> liberty of getting rid of a redundant QHBox around the segment-name
> label and its pushbutton, laid these out with the existing grid
> manager of the Segment parameters box, and changed the pushbutton's
> label fr
Martin Shepherd wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
>
>> Martin Shepherd wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed. In my working copy, I now have the Segment parameters aligned
>>> with the top left corner. After hunting fruitlessly for child
>>> alignment options within frames, I ended up d
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 09:43, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> Hi Nick
> ...
Tsk!
Ingrid Pearson's at the Royal *College* of Music, not the RAM.
Political faux pas which I feel I should correct...
Nick/.
___
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lis
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 09:43, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> Hi Nick
>
> On Friday 16 June 2006 11:30, Nick Bailey wrote:
> > After months of careful honing, we consider the pitch tracker is no
> > longer too embarrassing to release to the wide world.
>
> Your page on this is full of information, but (fo
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 Jun 2006 12:09, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> Nope. To get an empty row below the populated rows, I simply told the
>> QGridLayout constructor that I needed an extra row, which I then
>> didn't add any widgets to. To make this absorb any extra v
On 20/06/06, Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 Jun 2006 11:43, Vince Negri wrote:
> > If I were coming at this without any history, I would expect that the
> > GUI would let you select a program of "[none]" for a track, which in
> > effect tells RG "I'm doing my own patch chan
On Tuesday 20 Jun 2006 12:09, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> Nope. To get an empty row below the populated rows, I simply told the
> QGridLayout constructor that I needed an extra row, which I then
> didn't add any widgets to. To make this absorb any extra vertical
> space, I then applied setRowStretch()
On Tuesday 20 Jun 2006 11:43, Vince Negri wrote:
> If I were coming at this without any history, I would expect that the
> GUI would let you select a program of "[none]" for a track, which in
> effect tells RG "I'm doing my own patch changes the hard way,
> thanks." The selected instrument then onl
>Your page on this is full of information, but (fool that I am!) I still cannot
>see "what it's for", even after reading it several times. The page seems to
>say "this microtonal project is a project about microtonalism" - you give
>lots of info on what that is, how it works, how it might be p
>My marginal inclination is to say we should merge the code in to the
>main source release, but make it a compile option that's off by
>default. Views from others?
>
>
I couldn't expect any more than that. I'd be happy with even the
Pitchtracker branch until everyone's happy about moving it,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> Agreed. In my working copy, I now have the Segment parameters aligned
>> with the top left corner. After hunting fruitlessly for child
>> alignment options within frames, I ended up doing this by adding an
>> empty row at th
On 20/06/06, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The rationale is that the program for an instrument is associated with that
> > instrument, and that RG's GUI only has one fixed association between
> > program and instrument (in the instrument parameters) so the GUI can't do
Martin Shepherd wrote:
> Agreed. In my working copy, I now have the Segment parameters aligned
> with the top left corner. After hunting fruitlessly for child
> alignment options within frames, I ended up doing this by adding an
> empty row at the bottom, and an empty column at the right of the
> S
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Monday 19 June 2006 7:54 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
>> Doesn't look too bad, does it? Needs to lose the group boxes within the
>> tab box, and I'd prefer the Segment parameters to be aligned with the top
>> of their containing tab box rat
Hi Nick
On Friday 16 June 2006 11:30, Nick Bailey wrote:
> After months of careful honing, we consider the pitch tracker is no longer
> too embarrassing to release to the wide world.
Your page on this is full of information, but (fool that I am!) I still cannot
see "what it's for", even after re
30 matches
Mail list logo
