On Sunday 05 October 2008, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> participation is has done nothing to sway me, and, frankly, quite a lot to
> convince me that I'm wasting my time bothering to talk to you at all.
Although that sense of irritation is mitigated by the realization that I just
got a message th
On Thursday 02 October 2008, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> However, a few things have been rather off-putting:
>
> - gmane posting is broken.
> - posts by non-subscribers appear to be moderated forever.
Non-member posts are moderated because 99.99% of them are some of the most
obnoxious spam imaginab
On Saturday 04 October 2008, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > Actually, I'd like to confine most of my RG effort to a Monday-Friday
> > schedule.
>
> No problem with that. I'm in much the same position myself -- and for
> much the same reason, it seems.
You guys and your family time. Just wait until you
Yves wrote:
> What happened to the mailing lists ?
> I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago...
me too. I thought everybody was quite, but it appears I messed most of the
dialog surrounding the coding of menus and toolbars.
It all just popped up today--and not all at one time eithe
2008/10/3 Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Where we used to call KStandardAction functions to create the standard
> e.g. file menu actions, we will need new actions created explicitly
>
Done already. But in conventional Qt4 style.
The objectName is missing there.
> (see the psName field of
2008/10/4 Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, do reply to the "actions: here's the plan" thread if you have
> any comments on the stuff in that -- I'd like to get at least an OK
>
Sure.
A few minutes please.
-
On Friday 03 October 2008, Chris Cannam wrote:
> (The code is src/gui/editors/segment/ControlEditorDialog.cpp -- I
> think this is in the wrong place, it should be in src/gui/studio.)
But let's leave it where it is for now.
All this up close and personal with the new structure after the reorgani
2008/10/3 D. Michael McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Emanuel proposes:
>> slot-name: slot_filter_selection
>> action-name: filter_selection
>> icon-name: filter_selection
>
> No. We're definitely not going to have slots with names like this, so the
> only way to make any change would be to change
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Emanuel Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without my fix, I get these errors when compiling NotationView in the
> cmake build process: [...]
> src/gui/editors/notation/NotationView.cpp:408: error: cannot allocate
> an object of abstract type 'Rosegarden::NotationCo
I'm currently looking for a MIDI editor/sequencer for Linux. As a KDE
fan (and developer, when I have time), I'm interested in rosegarden, as
it was originally a KDE3 program. I can't install my distro's package
since it wants to pull in huge amounts of KDE (which I build my own, so
this would
2008/10/2 Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here's one suggestion. We reduce each of the "static" action
> constructors (not necessarily the ones that are created on the fly
> like the note radio buttons, but at least the basic menu functions) to
> a one-liner that creates an action, assigns it
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Use something that could at the end serve as a standard method for
> all actions in rosegarden.
> - I partly like the idea of an external file for the actions, since
> source might look cleaner.
Well, we seem to have a co
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:50 AM, D. Michael McIntyre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have much energy for this just now. I've been very tired lately for
> some reason.
It's because you're not driving! The call of the road, the hum of the
finely tuned engine, the tang of diesel on the autumn
What shall we do about KActions in the Qt4 port?
In the old code, we have various ways of handling menu and toolbar
actions, mostly using the KActionCollection and KXMLGui classes.
Broadly speaking, for each available action, a KAction is created and
added to the current view's KActionCollection.
What happened to the mailing lists ?
I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago...
On Monday 29 September 2008 06:24:01 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> If it's not the transport stuff, it could be all the missing .moc files,
Yes, some .moc files are missing, but I eventually found the main
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Julie S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay, I'll be developer B. But, I will definitely have some questions as I
> proceed. I also will not be starting any updates until Monday. Actually,
> I'd like to confine most of my RG effort to a Monday-Friday schedule.
I found this little bug while working on the same dialog in branches/qt4.
The problem occurs when "Lyric" is selected in the text combo. Selecting
anything else in this combo doesn't remove the verse spinbox.
I directly committed a fix which seems to work (but I didn't make lot of
testing).
Than
On Sunday 28 September 2008 23:32:33 Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> the name changed to ui_RosegardenTransport.h
> for the cmake build at least, I'm not sure here for the qt4-makefile
The qt4-makefile doesn't generate that file and therefore doesn't give any
name to it.
I created it by hand, without mod
On Sunday 28 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> qt4-makefile still uses the old naming scheme, I think.
> use cmake
If I use CMake, I only get 30% compiling, which basically hasn't ever changed
the whole time we've had a working build system in the qt4 branch.
(Well, I haven't tried that fo
Dear Michael,
> > So, with that said, if you want me as developer B,
> then just give me the
> > green light.
>
> He already did, though if you can't get to this or
> don't want to fool with it,
> I'll take your place.
I'm okay with it. I just wanted to be certain everyone was aware of my pa
20 matches
Mail list logo
