o do use
chords, so I think everybody wins here.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http
orm across the board.
I can see where a truly clef-free segment would be useful, but such a thing
doesn't exist, and sounds terribly messy to implement. I'm not volunteering
to do it, nor am I suggesting anyone else endeavor to do so.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
in this case was actually broken all
along, and this new behavior is a bug fix. That's how I see it anyway.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
attention.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
---
some time back, and it shows up
here.
Hah. I forgot to add the damn pixmap to SVN. You must have been seeing a
broken icon because I did submit the code to refer to the missing icon, I
guess.
Fixed.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fana
On Saturday 29 July 2006 9:26 am, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> Hrm. I don't have any of that, because I didn't install last time. It
> seems to be on by default. I've compared an older installed build against
> the one in RGBuild, and this behavior h
another example of that.
Bearing in mind, of course, I didn't just spend an hour really running it
through its paces or anything. I just got a quick impression of before and
after, and I do like after better, based on this quick impression.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
at
least.
It's really a question of whether space saver button I came up with is too
confusing, I guess. If it isn't, then I would suggest we might want to use
the same concept for the label button in the SPB. Instead of an edit and a
non-editable text widget of some kind, us
On Sunday 23 July 2006 9:10 am, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 July 2006 09:33, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> > QT layout is evil. Twiddle, compile, worse. Twiddle, compile, worse.
>
> Alternate method proposed: draw it first in a paper, code, com
ter another two hours straight just going from bad to worse, it's time to
yield, lay down my sword, and move on.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion
p on
me. She's really getting bored looking at the back of my head.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden C
good.
Except for the unforeseen hideous bugs. Ah well. Maybe not.
Now about that lottery ticket
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; register
can quickly become difficult to read."
And how.
The bright side is it seems I have followed the trail of bread crumbs to the
bit where I make this damn stuff I've been working on all week actually do
something interesting!:wq
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan
I didn't make any such stupid mistake in actual code.
Not this time anyway. :)
> What I need is to go to the beach, or to the shower again. I'm melting.
On the bright side, at least you have the option of going to the beach on the
spur of the moment. :)
--
D. Michael 'Silvan
I think I will skip this for now and just go make these do something
interesting in the notation editor. I still have that yet to do before this
new feature actually does anything interesting.
Or maybe I will go to bed and sleep. That kind of sounds like a good idea,
actually.
Yes. Sl
tch of changes 15 minutes ago. One more
of these and I should be out of your hair for awhile.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Compani
t talked about offline so I could
send along a bunch of attachments) sounds very intriguing. I don't think I'm
up for having a go at writing it, but I quite like the idea.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified
reen.
I'll commit that in a bit.
I'll get back into the rest of this in a little while. I need to finish this
thought and move on for now.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user
chuck out some pre-configured segments of that length on all the tracks at
once. That would be copacetic.
Just throwing out random thoughts on the fly here in a hurry though. I
haven't given this deep thought.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED
the color might like to represent.
I see the MIDI xylophone actual trumpet thing in almost the same light, and
it's probably my equivalent of your obsession over pixel opacity. I don't
want an interface that makes me use names that don't match.
> Well, your explanation makes sense
f a chord, and
have them all come out as chords with different durations on different notes.
That kind of thing does come up, and I still don't see any way to get it
right.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; regi
e if I'm confused about your intentions, or if I'm just staring at
half finished work. This current arrangement seems kind of crazy.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linu
On Sunday 16 July 2006 4:53 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> I'm going to sit down real quick and try to fix this too wide problem before
I didn't get there. Oh well. I never made it to that hammock either.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL
;m going to miss the quiet most of all.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
ll probably make it in here eventually. It's
probably too early to tell just what's going to stay.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #
list I didn't get done this week.
It was a very productive vacation, and it wasn't all Rosegarden by a long
shot. I'm not much for doing nothing, but if nobody is making me do it, it's
still relaxing.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTEC
tion
editor. Then when I tried Heikki's new voice merge option, I dumped that,
and just left the version with all the segments spread out and editable. I
think that was pretty telling as far as what's preferable to use in the real
world, FWIW. Unlesss you come up with
a lot better these days. Though the stability of Linux helps. Now
I just get segfaults when I click the button.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registere
I didn't go for a branch, because branches always conflict in 10,000 ways, and
I have no idea how to resolve 10,000 conflicts. The last time I tried to do
that, I just threw away the entire source tree, and said to hell with it.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <
're doing. Neither is
the equivalent CVS book. It's all part of some secret hacker society or
something, and I guess you pros learned all of that crap in school.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek;
tation editor, and entirely
new code elsewhere. I don't think it's worth going into a branch for that,
personally. I've been trying to stake out my territory so you (and Michelle)
would only have to contend with any conflicts once.
Anyway, sorry I wasted my entire vacation workin
all it 2.0. What's the point of going a year between
releases, and then suddenly putting out two within a couple months of each
other?
And this is how *I* spend *my* vacation people. South of France my ass.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lin
enough to forestall user
criticism about how the facility can't be customized (yet?).
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.n
ng. Then I'll put
together collections of parameters for specific instruments, and then it will
be cigar time.
I doubt I'll make 1.3 with all of this. It's a lot of little things to get
right along the way.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[E
msgfmt po/cs.po -o po/cs.gmo
po/cs.po:2149: `msgid' and `msgstr' entries do not both end with '\n'
po/cs.po:2314: `msgid' and `msgstr' entries do not both end with '\n'
msgfmt: found 2 fatal errors
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silva
to gauge whether the pointer is sweeping across the tick
marks at exactly the right instant, but whatever error either way seems to be
the same over time.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; reg
x27;m going to go get some fresh air, and fire this off for discussion. I'm
100% positive about these needing to exist at the track, rather than
instrument level now, however. They *must* only affect things that do not
yet exist. At least I have settled that much in my head, at last.
the transposition in the middle of a
> staff? There clearly is for changing the MIDI patch.
>
> This thinking only applies as long as the track <-> staff relation exists,
> is that something that is changing?
The difference conceptually is that an instrument can belong to m
ably, if I do say so
myself.
Now, let's make that new button do something.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #24362
k they ought to belong to the track after all, I think I'm going
with Chris's suggestion there. Attaching these to the instrument does make
more sense to me, even though it's more work on the layout bits, because the
IPB is a lot more complicated.
I'll sit down for that tonight.
uld step in for that little bit of hackery. A
good introduction to Tinkering With Rosegarden 101 for anyone sitting on the
fence debating whether to get involved with development.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and
bout notation, and I have wasted so much time
in the intervening years dealing with the irritating pissant topic of how to
get sound from here to there.)
Well, anyway, let's see what I can do before I get so sleepy I have to go to
bed.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre ---
ontSize = #-3
> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -3)
> }
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.8/Documentation/user/lilypond/source/input/t
>est/collated-files.html#staff-size.ly
Chewing on all of this.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Sunday 09 July 2006 3:02 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> The final release is scheduled for next friday, July 14 2006. Please, test
> it and report problems. Thanks.
Builds fine this time. That bug is fixed. I only gave it a cursory look
otherwise.
--
D. Michael 'Silva
uch is likely to change in the
near future in the GUI until all of this new stuff shakes out into something
semi-permanent.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #24362
On Saturday 08 July 2006 8:51 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Should we drop the "-4" from the filename and directory name, in line
> with the gradual move toward dropping it everywhere else?
Ooooh, that gets my vote.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EM
e could export mechanically
in order to yield a similar result on the printed page, without the user
having to have anything to do with the .ly file directly.)
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registere
On Thursday 06 July 2006 4:25 pm, Michelle Donalies wrote:
> I don't have a place to post it so you can link to to it. How big is too
> big to post it to the list? The compressed tar file of the whole thing is
> 4.1 MB.
40K is the limit for attachments.
--
D. Michael
instrument.
You do raise a good point here. That would indeed be a PITA for nothing.
Pedro?
I don't think I'm nearly as convinced as I just was on this whole instrument
belonging to segment thing anymore.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silva
On Thursday 06 July 2006 6:11 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> I think that everybody has read permission, so if you have a moment to try
> it, or to copy it to the rosegarden directory...
http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/rosegarden-4-1.2.4pre1.tar.bz2
--
D. Michael 'Silva
e the money to spend on one, and would never be
able to use it without a real keyboard anyway.
OK, I'll STFU now. I'm outright babbling now.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; register
even more
> antique socket that had, er, 940 pins. Do I wish I understood this sort of
> thing, or would I prefer not to?)
I think we both know the answer to that question, and the answer is to look
straight ahead, whistle loudly, and walk right by.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan&
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 11:35 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> > I'll have to go rooting around in BIOS for that. Thanks for the tip.
>
> No pb. Did you get the email I sent you ? That was several months ago
> though, just when
hould be illegal for two Romance
language to have such diametrically opposed rules for such things.)
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden
> I see it's the fourth of July today -- happy America, Americans! -- and
Happy England is Evil Day! :D
> that puts me in mind to suggest the 14th (Bastille day) as a nice
> release date for 1.2.4. How about it?
Works for me.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
size of it?
When I say "not yet" I mean on the order of years probably. I just bought the
64-bit processor because it was the fastest mobo/CPU I could afford, and it
happened to be 64-bit. My bleeding edge pioneering days are long behind me
mon ami, long behind me.
--
D. Mic
uid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm
3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc
bogomips : 3629.98
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' M
acing it wholesale with a whole new
box.
Lots of dicking around ahead before I get this move done successfully. Both
installations on both respective hard drives are changing architectures,
video cards, etc., so it's probably going to be a long night ahead, and maybe
a long while.
--
erItems as far as I can
see. :D
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need
matically more
space than it should, and the IPB doesn't have much room. It would probably
be all but completely cut off on a screen less than 1024 tall. That needs
massaging.
Good work though, still.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday 30 June 2006 5:26 pm, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Friday 30 June 2006 4:05 pm, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> > Sorry about that. I previously sent it inline, because I didn't know
>
> OK, that one applied. I'll build it, and if it doesn't
On Friday 30 June 2006 4:05 pm, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> Sorry about that. I previously sent it inline, because I didn't know
OK, that one applied. I'll build it, and if it doesn't break anything, commit
it.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[
.
I don't see why that should be the case. I haven't changed anything that
should conflict here.
I'm probably just a dumbass.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243
to pose special difficulties for your proposal to use
more than one channel per Rosegarden instrument for special guitar effects.
I suggest you two might want to take this up with him, to avoid a future
train wreck.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTEC
erimental, and other distros could follow
suit, but how many potential Rosegarden users are actually running these
bleeding edge distros anyway?
I have no idea.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linu
anwhile everyone I can think of asking lately has been using 1.0.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
Using Tomcat
all the crazy bleeding edge people use, that would be totally copacetic.
(Los mucho el cool-o. Not culo. Get your mind out of the gutter.)
What I'm trying to get after is more people testing experimental things before
we release with gobs of bugs that don't get found until a
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
hackery.png
Description: PNG image
Using Tomcat but need to do more?
in the mud in pouring drenching rain to boot.
This should be ready for our next release, I think. Anything that isn't
working by then can just be //'ed out.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; register
become stable 1.4, or
something like that.
I don't know exactly at this moment. I'm still trying to get the mud out from
under my fingernails. It seems like a good idea off the top of my head, but
our user community might be too small to support this scheme.
--
D. Michael
.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security
These things are too useful to miss, but many will miss them. In Debian
parlance, they should be listed as "recommends" packages I think, but
not "depends."
Not quite sure what to think about all that just at this moment, but it's one
issue I'd like to put some
how these display in the GUI as long as they work.
This whole feature is a kludge anyway, and there are only a couple of these
that could conceivably be displayed in a graphically useful manner in the GUI
anyway.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sk on the rebound.
It's a lot faster to fsck two 300 GB hard drives running old fashioned ext2
than to recover from a swap thrash fest.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Au
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 7:48 pm, Vladimir Savic wrote:
> Is there any common reason why plugin's gui wont start?
File permissions is probably the most common one.
Don't have time for deeper diagnostics. Maybe try dssi-devel?
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre S
quite like it myself. I use the expanded palette of canned
colors all the time.
If we need to, we can do some kind of tersification on that stuff though. No
big whoop to me. Probably better IMHO to accommodate it though, because the
verbose color names are memorable.
--
D. Michael
7;m trying to turn Rosegarden into the GIMP or anything. I just
think they got this right, and even though it's an evil widget toolkit they
built it with, it's still right. IMHO.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and cer
ble Pedro's salary at once!
> Quite a bit of work though, all in all.
Indeed. Make that triple, no, we'll quadruple his salary!
(¡Felicitaciones! Vamos a pagarte cuatro veces más de lo que ganas ahora.
¿Cuatro por cero son? :) )
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre ---
to different segments on the same track.
Oooh! I hadn't even considered that! That has all kind of fascinating
potential too.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Au
, carry on Martin, carry on!
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
_
> their machines off it! Maybe that's a btt of a maintenance issue...
As far as my rate of success getting Rosegarden into people's hands, the
dealbreaker there has always been the printer. They always balk at having to
buy a new printer, and nobody ever seems to have one that will work
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 2:42 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > I hope you at least eat cheese. Please tell me you eat cheese.
>
> Of course I do :-). Love it, actually.
That's a relief.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
. Please tell me you eat cheese.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
___
too.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
___
Rosegarden-devel m
them away from certain software
> monopolies I could mention. Works for a lot of them!
They're dropping like flies, over here. Going back to Windows in droves. I'm
down to just one client left for my failed little service-oriented business
venture, and I suppose I'm glad to
I do.
The archives aren't cooperating at the moment, so I can't quote you. This is
about the event filter dialog. You rewrote the layout completely, and yelled
at me for using spacers.
Sniff.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fana
works is
far better than something you can't remotely afford.
But anyway, just a random thought there.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companio
display width, widget set,
window manager, etc. Run away from QSpacerItem. You did just fine coming up
with something that didn't require going there.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux us
though. Within a configurable context where anyone can have whatever they
prefer, I say have at it.
> Thanks for the tip.
Thanks for putting code where your mouth is. We love that around here. :D
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linu
d none of this
annoying business of things you never use having buggy build logic that makes
things fail unless you install all the crap they want and build them anyway.
(LIRC used to be that way, which is the only reason why I have a LIRC-enabled
Rosegarden.)
--
D. Michael 'Silvan'
On Monday 19 June 2006 12:32 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Saturday 17 Jun 2006 16:19, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> > If we ignore program changes that do not have names associated with them
>
> Actually if my reading of the code is right, it's less subtle t
ion, if
he's willing to make it configurable. Not too hard to figure that out
looking at examples in the code. Keyword: KConfig
We could go from there based on user concensus, and maybe change to that as
the default, eventually, with the original being the "classic" version or
x27;s a way to see what you're trying to parallel.
I hate WINE too, mind you.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://ros
xt events and this split stuff. Something
up there. Last time, with the range copy/paste, it was a dynamic apparently
contained on the left side of the cut, but located on the right side of the
cut by some fraction of time. Or something.
I guess I need to set up a simple test case and file a bu
to make 1024x768
work more comfortably. For that matter, I can still only see nine bars
myself.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.
On Sunday 18 June 2006 4:15 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> Sorry if I didn't explained myself very well. English is not my primary
> language.
It isn't Chris's primary language either. At least not so far as what we
call "English" around these parts. :D
-
ire many changes to
> Rosegarden, and it would allow people to write external synth-specific
> configuration GUIs in whatever language or scripting environment they
> wanted, provided that it had a way to send MIDI events.
I really have no particular interest in any of that, so I'll let you dis
re. I'd rather wait for others to
voice their opinions.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
___
ot the best plan. So I'm not going to commit it until other people
weigh in.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://ros
egarden is all about lots and lots of waiting, but we get there eventually.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tuto
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo