gt;
To: "Kepa Zubeldia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 14 February, 2002 09:42 AM
Subject: RE: auto-discovery of the "return path" (In the Kepa-DNS model)
Kepa,
I've been thinking quite a bit about the di
x:240-352-0714
-Original Message-
From: Kepa Zubeldia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: auto-discovery of the "return path" (In the Kepa-DNS model)
Chris,
The MX record points to the &q
Chris,
The MX record points to the "mail" server. Actually, to a server that
is listening for SMTP on Port 25, whether it is sendmail or otherwise.
The invention would be to use the same concept but it could be a generic
notion of EDI server that would be listening at the IP address specified
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: auto-discovery of the "return path" (In the Kepa-DNS model)
Speaking of semantics, we should figure out a standard term for the DNS
model that Kepa has suggested.
Anyway, in that model, if
g that the signer really is the provider assigned a
particular NPI.
William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
+1 (614) 487-0320
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher J. Feahr, OD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February, 2002 10:00 PM
Subje
Kepa,
is the "EDI Server" concept one that is in standard usage or is that the
part we are proposing to "invent" here? If I understand the MX Record
concept correctly, it is essentially a routing table on the DNS server that
tells the world the address of a particular machine that is under con
Chris,
Nothing is "automatic", but a provider that designates a clearinghouse
as its delivery point would also designate the clearinghouse as its DNS
server. A provider that has its own "server" acting as its own delivery
point, would have to point its DNS server to the EDI server acting as a
Speaking of semantics, we should figure out a standard term for the DNS
model that Kepa has suggested.
Anyway, in that model, if a "small provider" (also needs a definition!) is
able to send a claim (or anything) directly to a payor using the health
plan's "smart EDI address"... will this auto
