On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:44 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I will look for you. todo++.
>>
Google "Michael Jennings RPM %clean" quickly finds one (of several) threads
I remember:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/rpm/msg05401.html
As you can quickly see, the issue or removing %clean
On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:44 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>
> No, I'm not saying that I'm even planning on actively ripping out %clean
> everywhere, but I do have started ripping out other things like
> %defattr, BuildRoot: etc. every now and then.
> I'm just arguing that's why I haven't ripped it
2011/3/24 Jeff Johnson :
>
> On Mar 23, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
>> 2011/3/23 Jeff Johnson :
>>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>>
>
Yes, but this isn't run unless %clean exists in the spec file..
>>>
>>> Not true (from 4+ year old mem
On Mar 23, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> 2011/3/23 Jeff Johnson :
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, but this isn't run unless %clean exists in the spec file..
>>>
>>
>> Not true (from 4+ year old memory). But I've forgot.
> Well, yo
2011/3/23 Jeff Johnson :
>
> On Mar 23, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
>>>
>> Yes, but this isn't run unless %clean exists in the spec file..
>>
>
> Not true (from 4+ year old memory). But I've forgot.
Well, your memory seems to be wrong then.. ;)
This is the reason why I've not yet
On Mar 23, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>
> Yes, but this isn't run unless %clean exists in the spec file..
>
Not true (from 4+ year old memory). But I've forgot.
PART_CLEAN (because its compiled in) is my major objection.
I also see no need for overrides and all the usual stu
2011/3/23 Jeff Johnson :
>
> On Mar 23, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> This is a reversion from what was intended and already implemented
>> almost 4 years ago.
>>
>> Under #ifdef RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA please.
>>
>
> Since your first question is likely:
> OK where is it?
>
> The mu
2011/3/23 Jeff Johnson :
> This is a reversion from what was intended and already implemented
> almost 4 years ago.
>
> Under #ifdef RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA please.
So %clean shouldn't be run by default if not added to .spec?
As %clean is a preferred default, it would seem backwards not having
it invo
On Mar 23, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> This is a reversion from what was intended and already implemented
> almost 4 years ago.
>
> Under #ifdef RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA please.
>
Since your first question is likely:
OK where is it?
The murky path to automated (and configurable
This is a reversion from what was intended and already implemented
almost 4 years ago.
Under #ifdef RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA please.
73 de Jeff
On Mar 23, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
> http://rpm5.org/cvs/
> ___
10 matches
Mail list logo
