Kicking popt out of rpm doesn't exactly specify where popt should go.
Establishing a bona-fide upstream for popt is necessary
to really split popt from rpm. That is a positively, rather than
a negatively, expressed goal, and so is likelier to succeed
in the long run.
Ralf: Can we set up a single
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Kicking popt out of rpm doesn't exactly specify where popt should go.
>
> Establishing a bona-fide upstream for popt is necessary
> to really split popt from rpm. That is a positively, rather than
> a negatively, expressed goal, and so is likelier to
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> OTOH, I'm not sure what problem is actually solved. However I've
>> been asked for separate popt every 6 months or so for years and years.
>
> IMHO as long as POPT is available as RPMs and Tarballs in its own
> http://rpm5.org/files/popt/ this should be really full
On Jun 3, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Kicking popt out of rpm doesn't exactly specify where popt should
go.
Establishing a bona-fide upstream for popt is necessary
to really split popt from rpm. That is a positively, rather than
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> [...]
> I too think a separate mailing list is overkill, but the issue is
> signification, not otherwise. So [EMAIL PROTECTED] please.
Ok, established. RPM project team members are already
pre-subscribed under their [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.
> (as
On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:31 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
[...]
I too think a separate mailing list is overkill, but the issue is
signification, not otherwise. So [EMAIL PROTECTED] please.
Ok, established. RPM project team members are already
pre-su
