http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373
--- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual 2009-03-02
10:03:30 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The validation is not compulsory: desktop-file-validate MAY be used instead if
> the .desktop file's content/location does not need modification.
It doesn
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151
Chitlesh GOORAH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Kevin Kofler pisze:
> Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> rhel 5.3, IIRC which doesn't have the matching equivalent in centos yet.
>> Isn't it ?
>
> RHEL 5.3 only provides the latest yum which is needed to process the SHA256
> metadata. That one is also in centos-testing for CentOS 5.2. That plus
> python-h
On 02.03.2009 17:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Kevin Kofler pisze:
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
rhel 5.3, IIRC which doesn't have the matching equivalent in centos yet.
Isn't it ?
RHEL 5.3 only provides the latest yum which is needed to process the SHA256
metadata. That one is also in centos-testing fo
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 12
fglrx-kmod-9.2-1.fc10
fglrx-kmod-9.2-2.fc10
fglrx-kmod-9.2-2.fc10.1
madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.fc10.16
nvidia-173xx-kmod-
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 23
avidemux-2.4.4-2.fc10
blcr-kmod-0.8.0-2.fc10.2
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.18
NEW cmus-2.2.0-3.fc10 : Ncurses-Based Music Player
desmume
On 01.03.2009 00:05, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[Catching up on this after a long time so excuse the delay]
- no RPM Fusion Fedora remix maintained within the project; do we
want one? Or even proper install DVDs that already contain packages
from RPM Fusion?
I was very ha
reply to a message on fedora-devel-list
On 02.03.2009 20:47, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 01.03.2009 04:05, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
On Saturday 28 February 2009 09:48:54 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
RPM Fusion currently discusses some of it's goals for the near and long
term future: http://rpmfu
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> (a) you tried to do many things own your own
Isn't that what you are doing too? E.g. when you single-handedly decided to
ban libdvdcss and flame everybody who objecs to it? Which incidentally is
also causing this issue:
> But right now there isn't much to decide afaik,
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Maybe putting everything aside and starting fresh might help; e.g.
discuss what we want: name(s), target audience, gnome vs. kde (we
should do both), free and nonfree, Live-Spin vs. regular install
media, ...; that might help to get things rolling again (but maybe I'
Kevin Kofler wrote:
gnome vs. kde (we should do both)
+1
The current Omega isn't of much use to KDE users.
Then build a KDE variant. What is stopping you?
Rahul
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
But right now there isn't much to decide afaik, as omega includes
packages that are not part of Fedora and RPM Fusion. That IMHO makes
it just as unacceptable for RPM Fusion as an official Fedora spin with
a RPM Fusion package in it.
I will just add this: In my previ
On Monday 02 March 2009 03:56:45 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> gnome vs. kde (we should do both)
> >
> > +1
> > The current Omega isn't of much use to KDE users.
>
> Then build a KDE variant. What is stopping you?
>
> Rahul
Lack of interest.
--
Conrad Meyer
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 3
NEW mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-10.0-1.fc10 : Mock config files for the RPM Fusion
NonFree Repository
xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.2-2.fc10
NEW xorg-x11-drv-nvi
On 02.03.2009 20:57, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
(a) you tried to do many things own your own
Isn't that what you are doing too?
I'm well aware that I sometimes might have done that now and then --
especially in the phase to get RPM Fusion started, as I got the
impression e
On 03.03.2009 06:44, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 02.03.2009 20:57, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
(a) you tried to do many things own your own
Isn't that what you are doing too?
I'm well aware that I sometimes might have done that now and then --
especially in the phase to get R
On 03.03.2009 00:55, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[...]
I will ask again, are you or the steering committee
or whoever it is that is making the decision now willing to host Omega?
I for one would like to see this (from the top of my head; maybe I
forget something) before I'd
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
- ideally a KDE spin as well, as I would like to prevent "RPM Fusion
ignores KDE" fame; related: the name discussion, as the basic name of
our first spin should leave room for other spins, hence your spins
would need to be something like Omega Desktop or Omega Gnome a
18 matches
Mail list logo
