2008/11/13 Jochen Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-177.82-1.fc10
-
* Thu Nov 13 2008 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 177.82-1
- Update to 177.82
I'm missing the
2008/11/10 Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I grabbed srpms for F10 and built on F9. Good news is, seems to work.
Bad news: 177.80 gives rediculously high CPU usage on my system. Doing
nothing at all, xorg is using 17%. Scroll a simple web page, usage is 33%.
(--) PCI:*([EMAIL
2008/11/5 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 12:15:49 am rontti wrote:
Hello,
I've been searching recent VLC 0.9.5 for fc8. I use acer aspire one
netbook, which is based on fc8. Acer has tailored fc8 to suit to a small
netbook, so it can not easily be upgraded to
2008/11/5 Erik van Pienbroek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Op woensdag 05-11-2008 om 10:15 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef rontti:
Hello,
I've been searching recent VLC 0.9.5 for fc8. I use acer aspire one
netbook, which is based on fc8.
Please note that these netbooks don't use Fedora 8, but a forked
2008/10/29 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Which BTW brings us to the question: how do we want to handle testing in
the future?
Yep and I remember to have asked the same question worded like this:
Do updates-testing behaviours ends to be like it was with livna or with fedora?
The push
2008/10/30 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 30.10.2008 10:12, KH KH wrote:
But what is needed actually is a way to also propose an update to
0.9.x. Can I handle that with the rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
repository? It will lead to have two parallels cvs (F-8 F
2008/10/30 Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Rule of thumb: Use development for the somewhat experimental stuff as long
as the freeze is far away. The more dependencies, the higher the risk for
major version upgrades in stable. They are not worth the trouble.
Updates-testing is not
2008/10/28 Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
mednafen devs have released a new version today. It's 0.8.A, and it is
newer than 0.8.9 (think hex). The problem is that rpm thinks that 0.8.9
is older. This seems like epoch bump will be necessary, but kwizart
suggested using fake version
Last Rawhide push issued an update of libcaca which removed the
libcucul.so.0 soname.
From the upstream NEWS , that was expected:
\section news0_99_beta15 Changes between 0.9.beta15 and 0.99.beta14
- libcucul was merged back into libcaca for more clarity
Nothing earlier than 2.2.2 is expected to be really useable.
abompard and me were waiting for a fedora dependency approval which
happened earlier this week-end.
This package will need to be updated for all Fedora version.
2008/10/26 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: thl
Update of
2008/10/16 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all!
I just downloaded the latest F8 and F9 srpm for all freshrpms packages,
extracted them using rpmdev-extract, moved the big source files (*tar, *zip,
*run, *bz2, *gz, ...) away and uploaded everything else to:
2008/9/2 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
More and more people asked for mock configs files that they can use for
test-building RPM Fusion packages. I don't have such files, but I uploaded
I'm working on this...(almost finished despite few questions/notes).
- Right now, they are
2008/10/7 Mario Chacon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
HI!
I'm trying to make it works my D-LINK DUB-T210 TV Card.It's fedora
beta 10 compatibly with Module em2880_dvd?
You meant em28xx-dvb.
It should also works with:
vlc channels.conf
once vlc is installed and you have created your channels.conf with
2008/10/8 Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The latest rawhide snapshot + rpmfusion repos. This includes generic-logos
and generic-release (since rpmfusion release packages now depends on
system-release), fixes a number of issues:
* Default user is simply liveuser instead of fedora
*
2008/10/9 Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Xavier Lamien wrote:
I really appreciate the effort and the work done for this spin but
I'd really see a _clear_ discussion about that project before start
host anything (including the name of the future Official RPMFusion
spin).
We have already
Hello.
Rebuild of madwifi has been tested for kernel 2.6.27
Here are the package to import in the rawhide branch for rpmfusion_nonfree
Actually there is a choice between the trunk or the new
hal-0.10.5.6 branches but this last will be merged in the trunk
sooner or later.
(not done yet). I would
2008/9/27 Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I rebuilt vlc-0.9.3-1 (from rpmfusion devel) on F9. Built OK, but no sound.
I get:
[0429] pulse audio output error: Failed to connect to server: Connection
refused
[0429] pulse audio output error: Pulse initialization failed
*** PULSEAUDIO:
2008/9/1 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's the status of kmods in rpmfusion? I'm going to need nvida binary
blobs packaged for EL-5 very soon. I'll try to package them myself if
need be, but I'd really prefer an EL-5 branch of current driver packages.
There is no clear
2008/8/26 Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have been keep a tab on rpmfusion progress by reading the archives and it
seems the repository is getting reading for launch soon. Congrats on that.
My primary interest here at the moment is creating a spin based on rpmfusion
and Fedora
2008/8/11 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You are a Fedora/EPEL packager and interested in RPM Fusion for EL/EPEL as
well but don't own packages in RPM Fusion (or dribble / frehsrpms / livna)
I'm in for the packages I already take care...
Nicolas (kwizart)
2008/8/10 David Juran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello.
I noticed that ffmpeg in the F-8 and F-9 version of rpmfusion is the
version from livna devel with the new include-files structure. Is this
intentional? I would much rather prefer if the livna F-8 version was
used for rpmfusion F-8 so that I
2008/7/24 David Juran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:13 +0200, KH KH wrote:
- Update package
- import new package wich obsoletes Upgrade/Path
OK, let's get back to the root of this problem. Maybe the timing for
re-creating the mpeg2dec package under a different name
2008/7/24 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 24.07.2008 10:31, David Juran wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:13 +0200, KH KH wrote:
- Update package
- import new package wich obsoletes Upgrade/Path
OK, let's get back to the root of this problem. Maybe the timing for
re-creating
2008/7/24 David Juran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:52 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 24.07.2008 10:31, David Juran wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:13 +0200, KH KH wrote:
- Update package
- import new package wich obsoletes Upgrade/Path
OK, let's get back to the root
2008/7/24 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 24.07.2008 11:18, KH KH wrote:
2008/7/24 David Juran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:52 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 24.07.2008 10:31, David Juran wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:13 +0200, KH KH wrote:
- Update package
Each package that is currently build (either in F-9 F-8 or devel
repository) have it CFLAGS set incorrectly at build time
In most case, that was caused by the %configure macro to be set incorrectly.
I don't know what happen here, but since it still work with the
current set of Fedora package
2008/4/8, Valent Turkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
is anybody using kdenlive on fedora? I heard in tlts podcast [1] that
it is the best video editor (interview with Dan Sawyer who is a Linux
writer and does professional video production). Please listen to this
podcast if you are looking
27 matches
Mail list logo
