On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 02:07 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> 2. Who will generate the metadata and where?
>
> 3. How will the metadata be packaged to ship in the repositories?
I did a trial run today. Interested folks can see the results on the bug
here:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 18:27 +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> Elad's proposal is about deciding if we want RPMFusion packages to be
> accessible to Desktop Fedora users or not. It's that simple.
Bringing the thread back to topic. Questions that need answering:
0. Do we want to ship appdata for RPMFu
Karel Volný wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> not that I'd oppose the idea as a whole, but I'm a bit concerned about
> this part:
>
>> The AppData metadata includes simple XML files with app descriptions, and
> a
>> tarball of app icons.
>> They can be distributed in the rpmfusion-free-release and
>> rpmfusio
The point of this thread is not to judge how the new Software app works.
If someone has suggestions that would improve it, he/she should go
upstream (Gnome).
Elad's proposal is about deciding if we want RPMFusion packages to be
accessible to Desktop Fedora users or not. It's that simple.
signatu
Your mail was full of personal attacks on me and other gnome-software /
appstream developers.
As such I am not going to respond to any of the points you raised. Goodbye.
Hi,
Dne středa, 13. srpna 2014 10:32:58 CEST, Elad Alfassa napsal(a):
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
now I'm confused, as you talked about putting it into *-release ...?
Re-read my message please. I suggested two options: putting the metadata
in
the release packages
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 11:34 +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> +1. I think it's really frustrating for end users that they can't
> currently find RPMfusion applications through Software Center (which
> is
> the default and only preinstalled application for installing new
> software).
+1
The fedora pac
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
>
> now I'm confused, as you talked about putting it into *-release ...?
Re-read my message please. I suggested two options: putting the metadata in
the release packages *or* in a separate package.
>
> so it will be duplicated ... rpm still
Hi,
The AppData metadata includes simple XML files with app descriptions,
and
a tarball of app icons.
They can be distributed in the rpmfusion-free-release and
rpmfusion-nonfree-release packages and will only add a couple more
megabytes.
from the user's point of view, even if it is only "a
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Emmanuel Seyman
wrote:
> * Elad Alfassa [11/08/2014 19:28] :
> >
> > I don't consider 7.3MB a lot, in these days
> > when storage is relatively cheap.
>
> The problem isn't so much storage but bandwidth. Some people have capped or
> s
* Elad Alfassa [11/08/2014 19:28] :
>
> I don't consider 7.3MB a lot, in these days
> when storage is relatively cheap.
The problem isn't so much storage but bandwidth. Some people have capped or
slow bandwidth and don't appreciate packages that are regularly rebuilt a
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 18:06 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
> Hello RPM Fusion developers.
>
>
> I'm interested in adding AppData metadata for RPM Fusion.
>
> This will make RPMFusion apps look better in gnome-software (the
> default app installer in Fedora) and greatly improve our user
> experience.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> not that I'd oppose the idea as a whole, but I'm a bit concerned about
> this part:
>
>
> The AppData metadata includes simple XML files with app descriptions, and
>>
> a
>
>> tarball of app icons.
>> They can be distributed in the
Hi,
not that I'd oppose the idea as a whole, but I'm a bit concerned about this
part:
The AppData metadata includes simple XML files with app descriptions, and
a
tarball of app icons.
They can be distributed in the rpmfusion-free-release and
rpmfusion-nonfree-release packages and will only
Hello RPM Fusion developers.
I'm interested in adding AppData metadata for RPM Fusion.
This will make RPMFusion apps look better in gnome-software (the default
app installer in Fedora) and greatly improve our user experience. RPM
Fusion apps will be easily discoverable by users and will get more
e
15 matches
Mail list logo
