qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld rebuild for qt 5.15.10 in progress

Hi folks, Just an FYI. I'm in the process of rebuilding qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld for the Fedora qt 5.15.10 update for F38+ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine/c/e596b1ceeb05fc04212374c418e2b8c792652f9b?branch=rawhide (dnf will complain of broken deps in the meantime) -- Thanks

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld is still maintained ?

Hi Ankur, Ankur Sinha via rpmfusion-developers wrote: > Just saw your new build for F38. I thought I had rebuilt the F38 package > for qt 5.15.9 already---my local mock build here certainly shows it > (it's the package I'm using now): > > $ rpm -qi qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld --req

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld is still maintained ?

Hi Kevin, Just saw your new build for F38. I thought I had rebuilt the F38 package for qt 5.15.9 already---my local mock build here certainly shows it (it's the package I'm using now): $ rpm -qi qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld --requires | grep qt Name: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld Source RPM

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld is still maintained ?

Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote: > According to pkgdb, this is still the case, but none has updated this > package for qt5-5.15.9 > https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld/ If QtBase gets updated, we can only rebuild QtWebEngine against

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld is still maintained ?

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 12:01:16 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote: > Hi there, Hello, > According to pkgdb, this is still the case, but none has updated this > package for qt5-5.15.9 > https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld/ I usu

qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld is still maintained ?

Hi there, According to pkgdb, this is still the case, but none has updated this package for qt5-5.15.9 https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld/ Does this package still worth it (with ffmpeg-free in fedora ?) Can we properly obsoletes it instead

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

o, so omit all debuginfo %global debug_config %{nil} # reduce debug info even for the Qt parts to a minimum %global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed 's/-g /-g1 /') # tune down SMP to reduce memory use further %global _smp_build_ncpus 6 I obtained a successful build of qt5-qtwebengine-freeworl

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

--- Begin Message --- Leigh Scott wrote: > You will need to disable debuginfo (use -g0) if your going to build > for aarch64. Oh fun, I looked at the offending command line, and it does attempt to pass -g0, but this is then overwritten by -g appended (twice, even) later, coming from the RPM

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

--- Begin Message --- On 24/01/2022 17:50, Kevin Kofler wrote: Do you have any idea how we can resolve the issue or should I just go back to building the package on x86_64 only? Take a look at the Telegram Desktop hacks:

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

You will need to disable debuginfo  (use -g0)  if your going to build for aarch64. On 24/01/2022 16:50, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers wrote: ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send

qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

--- Begin Message --- Hi, since chromium-freeworld, which is based on the same codebase and takes almost twice as long to build on x86_64 as qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, has had several successful builds on aarch64: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=506 I have decided to give

Re: rawhide/f33: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld rebuild for qt 5.15.1 update

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 08:33:24 -, Leigh Scott wrote: > File a bug report so the maintainer sees it! OK! (5x more exclaiming XD) https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5773 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |

Re: rawhide/f33: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld rebuild for qt 5.15.1 update

File a bug report so the maintainer sees it! ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

rawhide/f33: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld rebuild for qt 5.15.1 update

Hello, I hope everyone is doing well. I *think* qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld needs to be rebuilt for this qt 5.15.1 update[1,2]. At the moment, installing the package on F33 tries to downgrade lots of qt bits. I updated the rpmfusion spec based on the fedora update and tested out a build on mock

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

Leigh Scott wrote: > If you don't do it your package will sit in update-testing forever, I > don't have time to monitor bodhi for shit I don't use! Either that or it's > get pushed whenever regardless or the matching fedora package. I don't > give a damn if it breaks, It's your job to coordinate

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > There is a need to adapt the koji policy in this case. Or do you > managed to move it to updates once the package was moved back to > testing ? The Koji policy allows moving from updates-testing to updates, but not from updates to f31-free (GA) nor from updates back to

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

Le ven. 20 sept. 2019 à 00:25, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I have submitted http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=358046 . > > The build succeeded on Tuesday: > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=12008 > and went out to the updates-testing repo. > >

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

> (I think it would be better if you did not tell non-admins to mess with > koji-rpmfusion move-tag at all and just let the admins do all the moves as > in the past.) If you don't do it your package will sit in update-testing forever, I don't have time to monitor bodhi for shit I don't use!

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

Kevin Kofler wrote: > I have submitted http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=358046 . The build succeeded on Tuesday: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=12008 and went out to the updates-testing repo. Now, I accidentally moved it to f31-free-updates, which was not a good

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > I really hope someone can deal with this rebuild. I have submitted http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=358046 . Kevin Kofler ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

e can > > > help test? > > > > It is known: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5384 – > > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld needs a rebuild. > > Thanks Kevin, I'll wait for the rebuild and test it out when it is > ready. (CC'd myself to the bug now) > >

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 09:01:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Would this be a known issue please, and is there a fix/workaround we can > > help test? > > It is known: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5384 – > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Re: Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

Ankur Sinha wrote: > Would this be a known issue please, and is there a fix/workaround we can > help test? It is known: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5384 – qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld needs a rebuild. Kevin Kofler ___ rpm

Testing upgrade to F31: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld errors

Hello, I was checking the upgrade path to F31 from F30, and this error pops up currently: $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31 ... Error: Problem: package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc31.x86_64 requires libre2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc29

I might have time to sign, mash and sync the queue on Friday. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc29

Leigh Scott wrote: > Can't you move it when it needed?, I haven't got the time to monitor stuff > I don't use. > > koji-rpmfusion move-build f29-free-updates-testing f29-free-updates > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc29 I wasn't aware that this can be done self-service. (

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc29

org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5e4316109b went stable > on Sunday at 03:09:13 UTC. > > Kevin Kofler Can't you move it when it needed?, I haven't got the time to monitor stuff I don't use. koji-rpmfusion move-build f29-free-updates-testing f29-free-updates qt5-qtwebeng

qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc29

Hi, can you please let this go through to stable? (It was already included twice in the automated push reports, but the package must have been filtered out manually. It is not in the repo, at least.) The corresponding Fedora update https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5e4316109b

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Due a slowness of armv7, I think it would be better drop build on armv7. I don't imagine anyone using it on an arm of 32 bits ... On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 14:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to orphan qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, along with the Fedora > qt5-qtweben

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] (re)enable use_system_ffmpeg, reduce debug on aarch64 to workaround FTBFS

* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [14/09/2018 11:39] : > > > +Patch103: > > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/qtwebengine-ffmpeg4.patch > > This link leads to a "Not found" page. That should probably be

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] (re)enable use_system_ffmpeg, reduce debug on aarch64 to workaround FTBFS

Hi, Rex. On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 23:00, Rex Dieter wrote: > commit 26788caabb228d3ea48ff52f4fd9f28545ad11ec > Author: Rex Dieter > Date: Wed Sep 12 15:59:46 2018 -0500 > > (re)enable use_system_ffmpeg, reduce debug on aarch64 to workaround FTBFS > >

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 14:43:03 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to orphan qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, along with the Fedora > qt5-qtwebengine package. Please see: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg247677.html > for the full story. > > I think it

Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Hi, I intend to orphan qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, along with the Fedora qt5-qtwebengine package. Please see: https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg247677.html for the full story. I think it would be best if it were picked up by the same person also  picking up qt5-qtwebengine in Fedora

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

d > 7960bubbros-1.6.2-6.fc29leigh123linux 2018-07-26 17:35:02 > canceled > > > On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 03:34 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I almost forgot we also not built > > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.11.1-1.fc29 > > it fails to build only on aarch64 [1] >

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

eled > > > > > > 8099npapi-vlc-2.2.7-0.4snap20180206.fc29leigh123linux > > > 2018-07-27 07:34:26 canceled > > > > > > 7960bubbros-1.6.2-6.fc29leigh123linux 2018-07-26 > > > 17:35:02 canceled > > > > > > &g

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

> 7960bubbros-1.6.2-6.fc29leigh123linux 2018-07-26 17:35:02 > canceled > > > On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 03:34 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I almost forgot we also not built > > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.11.1-1.fc29 > > it fails to build only on aarch64

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

t; > > On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 03:34 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > I almost forgot we also not built > > > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.11.1-1.fc29 > > > it fails to build only on aarch64 [1] > > > > > > [1] > > > http://koji.rpmfus

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

>> >> >> Also almost miss the builds with state cancelled ! >> >> >> >> 8180yabause-0.9.15-5.fc29 leigh123linux 2018-07-27 16:45:54 >> canceled >> >> 8099npapi-vlc-2.2.7-0.4snap20180206.fc29leigh123linux >> 2018-07-27

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

cancelled ! > >> > >> 8180yabause-0.9.15-5.fc29 leigh123linux 2018-07-27 16:45:54 > canceled > >> 8099npapi-vlc-2.2.7-0.4snap20180206.fc29leigh123linux > 2018-07-27 07:34:26 canceled > >> 7960bubbros-1.6.2-6.fc29leigh123linux

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

nux 2018-07-27 16:45:54 >> canceled >> 8099npapi-vlc-2.2.7-0.4snap20180206.fc29leigh123linux 2018-07-27 >> 07:34:26 canceled >> 7960bubbros-1.6.2-6.fc29leigh123linux 2018-07-26 17:35:02 >> canceled >> >> >> On Sat, 2018-07-28 at

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

ap20180206.fc29leigh123linux 2018-07-27 > 07:34:26 canceled > 7960bubbros-1.6.2-6.fc29leigh123linux 2018-07-26 17:35:02 > canceled > > > On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 03:34 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I almost forgot we also not built > > qt5-qtwebengine-freew

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

:02 canceled On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 03:34 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > I almost forgot we also not built > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.11.1-1.fc29 > it fails to build only on aarch64 [1] > > [1] > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=232243 > > > On Sat

[qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Re: Mass rebuild on 24th of July

I almost forgot we also not built qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.11.1-1.fc29 it fails to build only on aarch64 [1] [1] http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=232243 On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 03:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi !, > > On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 09:59 +0300, Vas

Re: [qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld] Drop -fabi-version=11 workaround, gcc-8.0.1-0.16.fc28 should fix this

7 @@ > Summary: Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version) > Name:qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld > Version: 5.10.1 > -Release: 1%{?dist} > +Release: 2%{?dist} > > %global major_minor %(echo %{version} | cut -d. -f-2) > %global major %(echo %{version} | cut -d. -f1

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 07:57 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > > > > After almost 5 days the build fail , but wasn't timeout ! I guess > > it > > was "No space left on device" ?! > > @Sergio, > Did you see my answer from two days ago ? (migh have some issue with > mailing list). I read it

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

> > > After almost 5 days the build fail , but wasn't timeout ! I guess it > was "No space left on device" ?! @Sergio, Did you see my answer from two days ago ? (migh have some issue with mailing list). The arm builders have crashed after several hours of compilation. I will resubmit the job on

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

option was > > > > correctly propagated from kojid.conf to the mock site- > > > > default.conf > > > > Thx Dan btw ;) > > > > > > > > While at it, I've also migrated the remaining f24 armv7 > > > > builders > > > >

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

; Probably because the build was resubmitted before i've set the > > > change in kojid > > > So I've resubmitted the build and verified that the option was > > > correctly propagated from kojid.conf to the mock site- > > > default.conf > > > Thx Dan btw ;

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

;> correctly propagated from kojid.conf to the mock site-default.conf >> Thx Dan btw ;) >> >> While at it, I've also migrated the remaining f24 armv7 builders to >> current f26. But it will not affects the qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld >> build (as it already failed on f2

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

I've also migrated the remaining f24 armv7 builders to > current f26. But it will not affects the qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld > build (as it already failed on f26 builders). So to sum-up the current situation. The last qt5-qtwebengine 5.10 build succeeded and took about 2 days and 2,5 hours to bu

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

n kojid So I've resubmitted the build and verified that the option was correctly propagated from kojid.conf to the mock site-default.conf Thx Dan btw ;) While at it, I've also migrated the remaining f24 armv7 builders to current f26. But it will not affects the qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld build (

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Hi, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > For this specific issue, I (one?) can probably find the option to > raise the koji task timeout. Is the increased timeout implemented now? My second build attempt also failed with a timeout, so I'll only resubmit it if the timeout has been increased. Kevin

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Gael STEPHAN wrote: > Hm and what about cross-compiling ? I work in the embedded software ( we > build mips and arm targets ), and we never ever considered native build, > linaro provides excellent cross toolchains for arm ( we cross compile on > a forked gentoo) AFAIK, OpenSUSE does that in

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

A quick search gave me this: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lantw44/arm-linux-gnueabi-toolchain/ Maybe the way to go Le 03/01/2018 à 08:53, Gael STEPHAN a écrit : Hm and what about cross-compiling ? I work in the embedded software ( we build mips and arm targets ), and we never ever

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Hm and what about cross-compiling ? I work in the embedded software ( we build mips and arm targets ), and we never ever considered native build, linaro provides excellent cross toolchains for arm ( we cross compile on a forked gentoo) I don't know how works an rpm buildsys but i'm fairly

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Karel Volný wrote: > wouldn't "more of them" work better than "faster"? > > - once upon a time, I had been using distcc successfully ... > > but I don't know how hard it would be to set it up ... just an idea It is surely not easy to set up something like distcc with Koji. Also,

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Hi, The only other solution would be for RPM Fusion to get faster 32-bit ARM builders, wouldn't "more of them" work better than "faster"? - once upon a time, I had been using distcc successfully ... but I don't know how hard it would be to set it up ... just an idea K. -- Karel Volný

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > What's annoying in this situation is more that the armv7hl build > failed than that it took time to build. Well, the long build times can also be an annoyance, particularly when I'm trying to get out security updates to all releases in a timely manner… > For this

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:24:31 +0100 Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2018-01-02 12:53 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > .. > > The only other solution would be for RPM Fusion to get faster > > 32-bit ARM builders, but it doesn't look like that is

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

2018-01-02 12:53 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > Sérgio Basto wrote: .. > The only other solution would be for RPM Fusion to get faster 32-bit ARM > builders, but it doesn't look like that is going to happen any time soon, > unfortunately. Few things: What's annoying in this

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Sérgio Basto wrote: > Build of qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld failed with EXCEPTION: > [commandTimeoutExpired()] [1], when it was almost build after 48 hours > ... > I notice that only in arm, the build took more than 24 hours in others > builders in less of 5 hours, package is done. Ma

qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

Hi , Build of qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld failed with EXCEPTION: [commandTimeoutExpired()] [1], when it was almost build after 48 hours ... I notice that only in arm, the build took more than 24 hours in others builders in less of 5 hours, package is done. May you sometimes not build in arm

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | Referenced

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> --- (Sorry for yet another post, but I forgot something important:) Just a note of warning: If you want to try out qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, you will have to close any running Qu

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler --- As explained on IRC, I tried not only https://www.youtube.com/html5 , but also an actual H.264-only video (from Twitter) that I was unable to watch with QupZilla before and that

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler --- > runtime not tested (qt-5.7.1 available only for rawhide a the moment) I did that now: http://i.imgur.com/BC7HzMC.png :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler --- I filled in the pkgdb form now, but that offers neither f24 nor f23 branches. OK, f23 is almost dead and Fedora does not allow new packages to be branched for f23, but why is f24 not

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #4) > setting fedora-review flag to X (not sure what that means, there doesn't > seem to be a + setting that matches fedora's workflow) Thx for

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

omment #5 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> --- Package CVS request == Package Name: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld Short Description: Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version) Owners: kkofler rdieter Branches: f25 f24 f23 InitialCC: -- Licen

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #4

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler --- > APPROVED Thanks! That was quick. Can you please set the fedora-review+ flag? > 1. MUST use verifiable sources, can you account for this difference? (maybe > used a different

[Bug 4368] Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2 |4 --- Comment #2

[Bug 4368] New: Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 Bug ID: 4368 Summary: Review request: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components (freeworld version) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware