Rspec gurus,
I have 2 questions about autospec. I've played around quite a bit, but can't
figure it out...
1. I got autospec to work with my directory structure
("examples/*_example.rb"), but it only works if I have an empty spec/
directory. Otherwise it reverts to running tests instead of
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:37 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Onno van der Straaten <
> onno.van.der.straa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to install the selenium client with gem install
>> selenium-client.
>> This returns the following message
>> ERROR: c
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Onno van der Straaten <
onno.van.der.straa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to install the selenium client with gem install selenium-client.
> This returns the following message
> ERROR: could not find gem selenium-client locally or in a repository
>
> BTW,
Hi,
I'm trying to install the selenium client with gem install selenium-client.
This returns the following message
ERROR: could not find gem selenium-client locally or in a repository
BTW, I'm following the RSpec book chapter 22 Automating the Browser with
Webrat and Selenium.
Wat this gem remov
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, rogerdpack wrote:
> Any interest in the following idea?
>
>
> a.should include?("1:4") # if there's no matcher called include? then
> just call include?
>
> or something along those lines?
-1
You can already say
a.should include("1:4")
which is clearer IMHO.
On Jan 14, 2010, at 1:17 pm, John Polling wrote:
> I think this is the part that I'm confusing myself with as most Cucumber
> information talks about using scenarios to drive the code out. So
> Cucumber comes first, whereas I used to do the Acceptance testing after
> all the other TDD stuff.
On Jan 14, 2010, at 12:15 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
> re: Integration testing, everybody has a different definition. Before Rails
> came along, the prevalent definition that I was aware of was "testing the
> behaviour of two non-trivial components together."
>
> More recently, the definition
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:49 pm, rogerdpack wrote:
> a.should include?("1:4") # if there's no matcher called include? then
> just call include?
Am I right thinking that this would mean writing a method_missing that creates
a matcher for every unhandled message on the example object (whatever scope
John Polling wrote:
Already reading that one thanks :-) It is a good book and it's helping
me get my head around it all. It's just a case of understanding when to
develop using Cucumber and when to user RSpec on it's own. I think this
will come with experience.
John
Others can explain it
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Joaquin Rivera Padron
wrote:
> hi
>
> 2010/1/14 John Polling
>
> Phillip Koebbe wrote:
>>
>> > Hi John. Maybe this will help:
>> >
>> > http://www.pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book
>> >
>> > It's a good book. But when you get to the part about Webrat and
>>
hi
2010/1/14 John Polling
> Phillip Koebbe wrote:
>
> > Hi John. Maybe this will help:
> >
> > http://www.pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book
> >
> > It's a good book. But when you get to the part about Webrat and
> > Selenium, just know that there are other options if you need them.
>
> Al
Phillip Koebbe wrote:
> Hi John. Maybe this will help:
>
> http://www.pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book
>
> It's a good book. But when you get to the part about Webrat and
> Selenium, just know that there are other options if you need them.
Already reading that one thanks :-) It is a go
On Jan 14, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
John Polling wrote:
Generally what I do is drive all my individual classes out using
NUnit
and Rhino.Mocks and then do the acceptance testing later with
FitNesse.
I think this is the part that I'm confusing myself with as most
Cucumber
John Polling wrote:
Generally what I do is drive all my individual classes out using NUnit
and Rhino.Mocks and then do the acceptance testing later with FitNesse.
I think this is the part that I'm confusing myself with as most Cucumber
information talks about using scenarios to drive the code
David Chelimsky wrote:
> Did you do all of your testing in NUnit?
>
> When I was working on .NET apps, I used FitNesse for acceptance testing
> and
> NUnit for isolation testing. With Rails, these same roles are played by
> Cucumber and RSpec.
>
Generally what I do is drive all my individual cl
On 14 Jan 2010, at 12:33, John Polling wrote:
> Do Rails developers generally not test things in isolation using mocking
> and stubbing?
Yes, that's what RSpec is for.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/l
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:33 AM, John Polling wrote:
> Thanks for this David.
>
> I suppose the thing I am so used to is testing classes in isolation
> whereas Cucumber is about testing everything together.
>
Did you do all of your testing in NUnit?
When I was working on .NET apps, I used FitNe
Thanks for this David.
I suppose the thing I am so used to is testing classes in isolation
whereas Cucumber is about testing everything together.
Do Rails developers generally not test things in isolation using mocking
and stubbing?
John
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:46 AM, John Polling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been a .Net developer for a number of years now and I'm a big fan
> of TDD / BDD. I have been following these principles for a couple of
> years and use tools such as NUnit for testing purposes.
>
> I am now looking at moving ac
Hi,
I've been a .Net developer for a number of years now and I'm a big fan
of TDD / BDD. I have been following these principles for a couple of
years and use tools such as NUnit for testing purposes.
I am now looking at moving across to using RoR for a number of projects
and I'm still getting my
20 matches
Mail list logo
