That shouldn't be needed. In my spec's it works fine. does:
describe ApplicationHelper do
it doesn't find what it's looking for do
helper.distribute(1,2,3,[4,5,6]).should eql([1,2,3])
end
end
work? I know that there was some talk of introducing an explicit
helper object on the list.
JD
unwanted side effects.
I should be able to delete a record any way I please (delete, destroy,
connection().execute(...)) and the test should pass.
However, each of those have different behaviour, and that is what I am
spec'ing when I do model.should_receive(:destroy)
James Deville
On Mar 18, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Nikos Dimitrakopoulos wrote:
Hi there all. Sorry if the question sounds silly but i'm rather new at
the 'mocking' stuff... So here is my problem (code helps more than
talking):
the model:
class Item ActiveRecord::Base
...
has_many :images, :dependent =
Doh! I can't believe that I missed that.
You can also use if self.images.size.zero?
Just a little more readable.
James Deville
On Mar 18, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Rafael Mueller wrote:
Hi Nikos,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Nikos Dimitrakopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the model:
class
Google for some of the stuff about story runner. It was originally not
plain text, that's just a convenience. There are some earlier
tutorials on David's blog about just doing stories.
JD
On Mar 13, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Rob Holland wrote:
Hi,
Having just played with getting my first plain
/support_spec.rb -e should
validate presence of attachment
.
Finished in 0.379727 seconds
1 example, 0 failures
Seems like a nested-example-group bug. Would you kindly submit this as
a report to http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com?
Cheers,
David
- Original Message
From: James
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
James Deville
http://devillecompanies.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec r3172
rspec_on_rails r3172
rails r8331
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
James Deville
http://devillecompanies.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec r3172
rspec_on_rails r3172
rails r8331
___
rspec-users mailing
.
Perhaps there should be a way to allow render_to_string to render a
without making all views render.
WDYT?
James Deville
http://devillecompanies.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec r3172
rspec_on_rails r3172
rails r8331
FWIW,
David
Thanks for your input,
e.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-tp15205668p15205668.html
Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
James Deville
http://devillecompanies.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the options for the program
being debugged.
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
James Deville
http
the block out and just write:
it should bla bla
No 'do', no 'end'. The example will be pending this way.
François
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
James Deville
http
It sounds like what you really want is the plain text stories. David
has a few good articles, and there have been some good ones on this
list.
JD
On Jan 20, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
I've gotten quite a bit out of Pat Maddox's screencast
Speaking for myself, since I support the same philosophy, I wouldn't
test the association. I don't care that it has_many posts. I might
care that I can add multiple posts, or that I can find posts by
criteria, so I would test that.
JD
On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Jonathan Leighton wrote:
://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hop!
James Deville
http://devillecompanies.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec r3172
rspec_on_rails r3172
On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:42 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 12:25 AM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:16 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:50 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:44 PM, David Chelimsky
What's the status on a rake task for the story runner. If nothing is
in progress, where could I start to try and build one?
JD
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Yeah, had a slight email conversation with David C about that in
regards to bug #188. I am wondering why we don't standardize it, ya
know convention over configuration and all.
JD
On Dec 19, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Josh Knowles wrote:
On 12/19/07, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's
What file is that in? I was looking for one in trunk earlier.
JD
On Dec 19, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
James Deville wrote:
What's the status on a rake task for the story runner. If nothing is
in progress, where could I start to try and build one?
JD
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah, had a slight email conversation with David C about that in
regards to bug #188. I am wondering why we don't standardize it, ya
know convention over configuration
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:44 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:40 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah, had a slight email conversation with David C
On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:16 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:50 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:44 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:40 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Chelimsky
On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:42 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 12:25 AM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:16 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:50 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:44 PM, David Chelimsky
is in a lib file that isn't directly loaded into the specs. It
is a convenience method: def test?; RAILS_ENV==test;end
I don't know why this method is being included in my tests, every
context has it as an example. Any ideas?
Jim D
On Dec 8, 2007, at 8:42 PM, James Deville wrote:
Begin
On 10/29/07, Jamal Soueidan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Ross (CWD) wrote:
Make sure you get a relatively current version of rspec or you will get:
/Users/me/rails/ubb/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/../../activesupport/
lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:263:in `load_missing_constant':
25 matches
Mail list logo
