Hello,
Hope you had a nice break David.
I've been thinking about hidden backtraces in the html stories some more
and I think having them carries little to no impact for the non-tech
consumers of the stories.
I think its similar to how we use Nagios. The business like to look at
the nice red
Ahh, good to know. Does that mean that the HTML isn't outputted until
all of the scenario's are ran for a particular story?
Exactly. It made the html much nicer but did loose that per scenario
output. I added a progress bar formatter so I could still get that
direct scenario feedback, be it
Which brings up the other question.. how do we want to handle the JS?
Due to how the HTML is written out JS is required to change the Story's
and Scenario's styles when a step fails or is pending. I did this with
lowpro for the rspec-story-tmbundle:
The current html formatter in trunk no
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Joseph Wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To handle this I wrote a patch which delivered the styles in the html
formatters output. In much the same way as the html spec formatter
does.
I know Aslak Hellesøy has been looking at the editable
To handle this I wrote a patch which delivered the styles in the html
formatters output. In much the same way as the html spec formatter does.
I know Aslak Hellesøy has been looking at the editable html stories.
Is it acceptable to have stories have styles embedded in the html
formatter until
Hiya,
I am trying to use the HTML Story Formatter in conjunction with
CruiseControl.rb. I have got it outputting the stories to a file, but I
notice there are CSS and JS files linked in the head, which don't appear
to be anywhere in the rspec repository. Are these files available and if
so where?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Jonathan Leighton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya,
I am trying to use the HTML Story Formatter in conjunction with
CruiseControl.rb. I have got it outputting the stories to a file, but I
notice there are CSS and JS files linked in the head, which don't appear
Thanks for both your answers. The copying rake task was pretty useful as
I was basically intending to write the same thing after I read David's
message :)
Jon
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 09:29 -0700, Christopher Bailey wrote:
For another variant, with my CC.rb setup, I have a rake task as follows:
