On Thursday 29 August 2013 11:46 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Sherin A sherin...@gmail.com
mailto:sherin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hope they will report it as a vulnerability , because this POC
has been exploited successfully and it is affected by all
exploited successfully and it is affected by all software that use
rsync as a backup and restore tool.
--
--
Regards
Sherin A
http://www.sherin.co.in/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 08:36 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Only when you choose to force a completely unnecessary chown between
the backup and restore process.
On 08/27/13 23:03, Sherin A wrote:
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote
.
On 08/14/13 15:20, Sherin A wrote:
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 11:04 PM, Kevin Korb wrote: The point
of --fake-super is that when you restore the file with --fake-super
it will restore with the original ownership. Of course that means
that the restore has to be run with super privs
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 10:24 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10:04PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
I am doing rsync from root@10.0.0.10/home/foo to
storageuser@10.0.0.20/home/storageuser/dailybackup/foo over ssh (no
role for -H)
Why not rsync from root to root? Or use
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 08:29 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:09:46PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 10:24 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
PS : if any one interested in making a patch with an additional
option for rsync for excluding hardlinks
valuable time and help .
--
--
Regards
Sherin A
http://www.sherin.co.in/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
with
- --fake-super it will restore with the original ownership. Of course
that means that the restore has to be run with super privs on the
target and --fake-super on the source.
On 08/14/13 13:30, Sherin A wrote:
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 10:25 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
/14/13 15:20, Sherin A wrote:
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 11:04 PM, Kevin Korb wrote: The point
of --fake-super is that when you restore the file with --fake-super
it will restore with the original ownership. Of course that means
that the restore has to be run with super privs on the target
/2013 01:11 AM, Sherin A wrote:
Can some one create a patch for excluding hard link regular file
from copying ?. May be like a command flag , rsync
--no-hardlink-copy
Hello Jose,
I think it is possible to check whether a file is regular file or
having more than one links, ( you can
, then backup is the least of your problems.
Joe
On 08/13/2013 03:00 AM, Sherin A wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 12:23 PM, Joe wrote:
Is there any way at all to say which is the original file and which is
the hard link? I'll bet there isn't, although I' m not an internals guy
at all. If so, this would
--
--
Regards
Sherin A
http://www.sherin.co.in/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
. :(
--
--
Regards
Sherin A
http://www.sherin.co.in/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:56 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that
(like
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 09:07 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:44:08PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 09:49 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:43:06PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
If linux user foo , with home /home/foo , what ownership we need
to give the files under his home folder , it must be foo and not
root.
Why? The user created the hardlink
Can some one create a patch for excluding hard link regular file from
copying ?. May be like a command flag , rsync --no-hardlink-copy
--
--
Regards
Sherin A
http://www.sherin.co.in/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting
17 matches
Mail list logo
