> > Perhaps i've misunderstood what you're attempting to do; however, if
> > you simply want to exclude some files (not delete them), then you
> > should be using --exclude instead.
> >
> > As far as the time requirement is concerned, you may wish to
> > consider generating the file listing ahead
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:04:48 +0530 "piyush joshi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>I want to exclude some files from the backup server. I got
> this option --delete-excluded but i want to only exclude those files
> which are older than one month from the current date and does no
Dear All,
I want to exclude some files from the backup server. I got this
option --delete-excluded but i want to only exclude those files which are
older than one month from the current date and does not exist on server how
can i achieve this with the help of rsync. Please help me i will
On Mon 03 Dec 2007, piyush joshi wrote:
>I am new to rsync command and i need your help .I have one
> mail server I take the back up of mail server on backup server but what
> happen all users delete there mail's from mail server but that does'nt
> deleted from back up server after
Dear All ,
I am new to rsync command and i need your help .I have one
mail server I take the back up of mail server on backup server but what
happen all users delete there mail's from mail server but that does'nt
deleted from back up server after that i used --delete option problem s
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4010
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4010
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-10 12:49 MST ---
--server is an internal option that rsync uses when invoking itself. End users
should never use it. Thus, I don't see a reason why it needs to be documented
in --help outpu
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4010
Summary: rsync --help dont display --server command
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 15:46 MST ---
FYI, I didn't like the wording of the --delete option, so I had just recently
improved it in the CVS version. I also improved the wording of the
existing/ignore-existing opt
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 17:16 MST ---
I don't think the terms sender and receiver are problematic; they're equivalent
to source and destination, respectively. However, some of the help is unclear
and/or ambiguou
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749
Summary: rsync --help misleading information
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
option and network connection
fails. I need to trransfer files that are on 40 drives abt (16000 files) I
am trying to find the best possible solution to transfer it as fast i can
without any issues.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a354
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 06:40:20AM -0800, lsk wrote:
> - with datafiles in dsetination takes more time
I assume you could use --whole-file instead of removing the destination
files manually.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before post
a.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3320951
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
--On Friday, March 03, 2006 9:21 AM -0500 Linus Hicks
Please configure your email client to not quote email addresses...
wrote:
This is certainly not true for the source machine. It typically has 70gb
free (it's still running a 32-bit Oracle database server). The
desti
--On Friday, March 03, 2006 9:21 AM -0500 Linus Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is certainly not true for the source machine. It typically has 70gb
free (it's still running a 32-bit Oracle database server). The
destination machine started out with about 2.8gb free. I will run it
again and
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:21:25AM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I'm transferring one file, which is obvious from my command line. Is the
FAQ incorrect?
The FAQ is incomplete in how the size of the file can affect the sender's
memory. If the destination file already exists, t
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:21:25AM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> I'm transferring one file, which is obvious from my command line. Is the
> FAQ incorrect?
The FAQ is incomplete in how the size of the file can affect the sender's
memory. If the destination file already exists, the sender needs to b
Linus Hicks wrote:
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I do not understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two
runs.
Since the user/sys CPU time didn't also mushroom, I would suggest that
you check to see if your system ran out of free
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I do not understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two
runs.
Since the user/sys CPU time didn't also mushroom, I would suggest that
you check to see if your system ran out of free memory and started t
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> I do not understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two
> runs.
Since the user/sys CPU time didn't also mushroom, I would suggest that
you check to see if your system ran out of free memory and started to
thrash as memory wa
en create a database using control file so I am desperate of trying
all options that would suffice my need to get this done in less amount of
time.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3215145
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at
Here's my contribution to information on performance. There are two different
cases. The first is a 1.6gb file that has a low volume of updates. The second
case is a 4gb file that has a high volume. All are non-local transfers. I do not
understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two r
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:45:20AM -0800, lsk wrote:
>
>
> Matt I have strange results to report I transferred 300 oracle datafiles of
> total 30 GB in size. Using the option " rsync -zv --no-whole-file --stats"
> it took 1:15 min and using "rsync -cvz" options earlier had took 1:25 min so
> the
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 07:43 -0800, lsk wrote:
> Matt I have strange results to report I transferred 300 oracle datafiles of
> total 30 GB in size. Using the option " rsync -zv --no-whole-file --stats"
> it took 1:15 min and using "rsync -cvz" options earlier had took 1:25 min so
> there wasn't much
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 09:20 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> rsync -a srchost:/ / --files-from=dbf-list
>
> and dbf-list would contain this:
>
> p02/oradata/OSID/redo01.log
> p03/oradata/OSID/redo02.log
> p04/oradata/OSID/redo03.log
> p01/oradata/OSID/system01.dbf
> p04/oradata/OSID/undotbs01.dbf
> p0
File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Total bytes sent: 184089
Total bytes received: 254026
sent 184089 bytes received 254026 bytes 2131.95 bytes/sec
total size is 167780352 speedup is 382.96
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t117
File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Total bytes sent: 184089
Total bytes received: 254026
sent 184089 bytes received 254026 bytes 2131.95 bytes/sec
total size is 167780352 speedup is 382.96
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t117
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 06:58 -0800, lsk wrote:
Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
option "--files-rom=FILE".
If my-list in the current directory contains
a
b
b/c
b/d
b/d
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 06:58 -0800, lsk wrote:
> Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
> option "--files-rom=FILE".
If my-list in the current directory contains
a
b
b/c
b/d
b/d/e ,
then the command
alling it for each
> file will wait for several network round trips per file.
Thanks Matt. I thought that might be the case.
--
//*** lsk => Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
option "--files-rom=FILE".
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
h
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 18:40 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I did something similar to what lsk is doing a few months back, I believe using
rsync 2.6.5. I wrote a script to query the database for all the datafiles and
rsync'ed them individually by specifying the full path to th
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 18:40 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> I did something similar to what lsk is doing a few months back, I believe
> using
> rsync 2.6.5. I wrote a script to query the database for all the datafiles and
> rsync'ed them individually by specifying the full path to the file. What I
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
/// lsk:- Thanks for the clarification Wayne, in my case no one
would be allowed to use the destination file until the process is
complete. As soon as my destination server is upgraded to the newer
version of rsync whic
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
> /// lsk:- Thanks for the clarification Wayne, in my case no one
> would be allowed to use the destination file until the process is
> complete. As soon as my destination server is upgraded to the newer
> version of rsync which supports --inpla
sync -zv --no-whole-file --stats /d01/app/testfile2.dbf
> tarser:/t01/app/testfile2.dbf
>
> Thanks,
> lsk.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3113956
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:58:26AM -0800, lsk wrote:
> 2) And Matt could explain little more on what do you mean by "atomicity"
What he meant is that, without --inplace, rsync creates an updated file
and moves it into place, making the update atomic (i.e. none of the
destination files are ever in
Hello,
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 05:58 -0800, lsk wrote:
> I am back with the results..here are the options I tried on a 7.0 GB file.
>
> =>No file on target (rm the file on the target and rsync) with "rsync -czv"
> it took 1 hr.
> =>File on target with but header info change on source with "rsync -
more on what do you mean by "atomicity"
3) We need to RSYNC a 5 TB worth of datafiles and the create a target
database by replicating the source so I need the best option to RSYNC only
the changes instead of the whole 5 TB database.
Thanks,
lsk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 14:32 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> At a minimum, when an Oracle database is opened and closed, the timestamps on
> all datafiles will be updated because the header blocks will get updated with
> a
> new SCN. So the timestamps on all datafiles will always look different the
Thanks Matt since morning I am running some real time tests with 7 GB
datafile as you had suggested I should post back the results as soon as that
finishes...and we could find out whether rsync algorithm works as it should.
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 11:43 -0800, lsk wrote:
Currently I use "rsync -czv" c for checksum.
If each data file's first few bytes ("header information") change
between rsync transfers, then --checksum buys you nothing. Normally
rsync will skip transferring a file if the
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 11:43 -0800, lsk wrote:
> lsk: This is oracle database the header information(timestamp..etc) on each
> datafile constantly changes which might be very small change but the data
> inside most of the datafiles are same they wont change much. New oracle
> datafiles will be added
s to refresh target server we remove all
datafiles on target and rsync all datafiles again from source. My question
is if we leave the older datafiles and rsync will it be faster ?
Currently I use "rsync -czv" c for checksum.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
osely, and compresses
files during transfer to speed it up. If you would like to watch it
happen, add --progress for cool status view.
What is the rsync command to be used ?
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3075671
Sent from
cleaning the old files so in the
old files only the changes will be copied and new files also needs to be
rsynced.
What is the rsync command to be used ?
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3075671
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:09:06AM +0200, Tibor V wrote:
> I need to populate folder1 [website] with folder2 [blueprints], that
> is for webpage.
I'm sorry, your question was too vague for me to be able to figure out
exactly what you are trying to do. Rsync works like a normal copy
command in man
Hi !
I have a question .
How to synchronize 2 folders. One folder1 is for webpage, and another
one2 is for data [blueprint-s] and its mapped.
I need to populate folder1 [website] with folder2 [blueprints], that
is for webpage.
Thank you,
Tibor Vovcak
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://l
Hi,
I have a problem that I think rsync might be able to help solve:
On a windows NT machine a process P1 is running which is
creating files in a folder E:\output
The files are typically fairly small, e.g. approximately
50 KB and process P1 may create in the order of 10,000 files
a day. The files
> SUN box, 2gig ram, hard drive space to spare. Rsync 2.5.5, solaris 5.7
> version 7.
> Half moon, I think it only seems to work on full moon nights.
>
> Here's the command I run as well .
> /usr/local/bin/rsync --delete --partial -P -p -z -e /usr/local/bin/ssh /dir1
> systemname:/storage
>
>
Title: RE: Rsync help
SUN box, 2gig ram, hard drive space to spare. Rsync 2.5.5, solaris 5.7 version 7.
Half moon, I think it only seems to work on full moon nights.
Here's the command I run as well .
/usr/local/bin/rsync --delete --partial -P -p -z -e /usr/local/bin/ssh
d [mailto:david.walgamotte@;wild.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:38 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Rsync help
>
>
>
>
> I get the following transering a large file use rsync over ssh.
>
> root@pbodb bin$ ./ausbk.sh
> building file list
Title: Rsync help
What
version of rsync? What operating system? What version of the OS? What is the
phase of the moon? C'mon, give us more clues. :-)
PG
-Original Message-From: Walgamotte, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002
12:38 PMTo: &#
Title: Rsync help
I get the following transering a large file use rsync over ssh.
root@pbodb bin$ ./ausbk.sh
building file list ...
10 files to consider
ERROR: out of memory in generate_sums
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (8 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol
Hi,
When i run the following command (on client side):
bash-2.05$ rsync -avz server::www /home/sonu/test/
i get the following error:
@ERROR: chdir failed
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (50 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(150)
Any s
On 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you mean rsync's call to chroot, or a chroot around the whole
> invocation of rsync? Rsync's chroot doesn't happen until after the "uid ="
> in rsyncd.conf is processed, so that still works without copying in the
> passwd file.
Oh, q
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:40:58PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2002, Sonu Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i get the following error:
> > @ERROR: invalid uid rsync
>
> You probably have a line like
>
> uid = rsync
>
> in the server's rsyncd.conf, but there's no such user defi
On 22 Apr 2002, Sonu Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i get the following error:
> @ERROR: invalid uid rsync
You probably have a line like
uid = rsync
in the server's rsyncd.conf, but there's no such user defined on the
server. If you're using a chroot jail, then the passwd file inside
th
I have installed n compliled rsync on my
server station as well as clinet... my
/etc/rsync.conf file seems to work fine...
but when i try to move (copy) my data from
the server to the client, like:
rsync -avz host::www /home/sonu/test
i get the following error:
@ERROR: invalid uid rsync
rsync:
60 matches
Mail list logo
