On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:30, Panu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal
>> disclaimers on ticket replies?
Refuse to give to give them any thought. They're worse than shrink-wrap
licenses. A screen of BS for a 2 line response about how to f
> How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal
> disclaimers on ticket replies?
MTA? (should work for normal emails too)
I personally hate them :) They have no other legal value than make
stupid people scared to sue for whatever reason. At least in most
European countries
Your mta should handle that
Not rt
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "Alex Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:11:39
To: RT Users
Subject: [rt-users] Email signature disclaimers
, Alex Young wrote:
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:11:39 -
> From: Alex Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: RT Users
> Subject: [rt-users] Email signature disclaimers
>
> How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal
> disclaimers on ticket replies?
How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal
disclaimers on ticket replies?
I'm wondering if we should be including it with every reply, just the
auto response or just in the first reply. Or if we can just include t as
an attachment automatically to keep the email thread cl
