Gordon, I didn't demand anything. I (for free, as you said) supplied
a patch which makes the software work. Without the patch, the
software does not function. The person I was replying to was making
an argument that this wasn't necessary, and my text quoted below was
simply making the
This patch was cribbed from somewhere else and improved, but it's
still not integrated into 3.8.4.Can we get this into 3.8.5 please?
--- lib/RT/Shredder/Plugin/Users.pm_orig2009-07-23
13:29:58.0 -0700
+++ lib/RT/Shredder/Plugin/Users.pm 2009-07-23 13:31:26.0
Demanding work be done by developers who kindly (ie for free) maintain
open source software, in my opinion, borders on being plain rude.
You are free to patch your own version of RT, or find alternative
software which falls more in line with your expectations for ongoing
development. The excuse
See comments in the ticket you created.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Jo Rhettjrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
This patch was cribbed from somewhere else and improved, but it's
still not integrated into 3.8.4. Can we get this into 3.8.5 please?
--- lib/RT/Shredder/Plugin/Users.pm_orig
Jo,
Let me give you simple advice. Don't attack developers, please.
Instead of proving that you're right, you started arguing and using
must word. Nobody in this community owes you anything. You didn't make
you case. Patches are not applied unless bug is obviouse, that's it.
In the ticket I
