On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>> Would it be okay if I dropped Manual from the front of the new page
>> names? Every time I see "ManualApache" I think "configuring Apache
>> by hand"... etc.
>
> Certainly.
>
> Will you leave the old page names as indexes to where the content
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:16:18AM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> >The ManualFoo pages were from an attempt to have a techwriter write a
> >proper manual a good few years back. The intent had been that it was
> >going to be a for-money item, but we
On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> The ManualFoo pages were from an attempt to have a techwriter write a
> proper manual a good few years back. The intent had been that it was
> going to be a for-money item, but we ended up posting the content
> instead of charging for it. I'd be
On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
> It's a wiki. One ought to simply do as one likes (within reason), yes?
It's also a colaborative effort and it has a primary owner, so I tend
to try and figure out what changes they would be happy with and which
they would prefer not to have
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:10:00AM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> There are some very very very long pages in the wiki. If we do add
> screenshots and stuff they will get even longer. In addition, many
> of the sections within pages would benefit from direct linking
> elsewhere in the site.
It's a wiki. One ought to simply do as one likes (within reason), yes?
--
Cambridge Energy Alliance: Save money. Save the planet.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commerc
There are some very very very long pages in the wiki. If we do add
screenshots and stuff they will get even longer. In addition, many
of the sections within pages would benefit from direct linking
elsewhere in the site.
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/ManualAdministration
in part
