Don't flatter yourslef, young huGe. Don't you get it? You will NEVER sit
at the cool kids table
RTR!
The Queen
>>(DevO bowing)You are the Queen!we're not worthy!
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and the single word "UNS
Don't flatter yourslef, young huGe. Don't you get it? You will NEVER sit at the cool
kids table
RTR!
The Queen
>
> From: "Hugh Wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2001/12/03 Mon PM 07:34:17 EST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE:
Hugh Wolfgang wrote:
> > I believe the appropriate title for the husband of a reigning
> > queen is "prince consort".
>
> Even when the husband of the queen is a fan of bulldogs?
Prince is a fairly common name for bulldogs.
--
Phil Harbison
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this lis
Scott,
No fair. I don't turn 30 for 4 1/2 months!
-Original Message-
No doubt, whether 3 or 30, you'll be the same ol HuGe we know and
adore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'t.got.no.fanclub.com
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject
No doubt, whether 3 or 30, you'll be the same ol HuGe we know and
adore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'t.got.no.fanclub.com
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My age is immaterial.
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit
My age is immaterial.
-Original Message-
Well, DUH!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?.net
- Original Message -
> We're discussing HIS title, not her's, Scott. Get with the program
> please :)
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject lin
Well, DUH!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?.net
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We're discussing HIS title, not her's, Scott. Get with the program
> please :)
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and th
We're discussing HIS title, not her's, Scott. Get with the program
please :)
-Original Message-
I think she were the Queen even before he was bestowed that title.
- Original Message -
> Even when the husband of the queen is a fan of bulldogs?
To unsubscribe from this list ju
Only, to aspire to such a lofty position.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I thought *I* was the Court Jester!?!?!?!?
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and the single wor
I think she were the Queen even before he was bestowed that title.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Even when the husband of the queen is a fan of bulldogs?
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK sub
I thought *I* was the Court Jester!?!?!?!?
-Original Message-
Court Jester?
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Wolfgang
What does that make Ron, then?
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and the single word "UNSUBSCRIBE"
Even when the husband of the queen is a fan of bulldogs?
-Original Message-
> > > Maybe I should take the Queen's advice.
> >
> > You should ALWAYS take the queen's advice. That's why we
> > have a queen! :-)
>
> What does that make Ron, then?
I believe the appropriate title for the h
HuGe wrote:
Tennessee is the single game that I think would have been
questionable.
BULLCRAP!!!
Bama's offense rolled up tons of yardage against the "great Vol D" and if it
were not for TWO BAD CALLS on turnovers Bama wins that game easily.
Again, we had 24 in that game with our stagnant offense
Wait a minute
Drive
No.
He threw a pass an we made a long TDTyler had one earlier in the
gamethey almost looked identical.
Anyway, I am not a Zow basher or a Watts basher, but if you can't see that
the whole team played better in the last two games you are blind.
Any QB could have
Hugh Wolfgang wrote:
> Phil wrote:
> > Rick McMahan wrote:
> > > Maybe I should take the Queen's advice.
> >
> > You should ALWAYS take the queen's advice. That's why we
> > have a queen! :-)
>
> What does that make Ron, then?
I believe the appropriate title for the husband of a reigning
queen
Court Jester?
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Wolfgang
What does that make Ron, then?
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and the single word "UNSUBSCRIBE" (without the quotes) in the
body or visit http://www.RollTideFan.
What does that make Ron, then?
-Original Message-
Rick McMahan wrote:
> Maybe I should take the Queen's advice.
You should ALWAYS take the queen's advice. That's why we
have a queen! :-)
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line
Jeff Todd wrote:
> My sincere apologies to the beautiful puppies.
Apology accepted! Are they not infinitely more beautiful
than that other picture?
OK, anything divided by zero is infinity, but you get
my point.
--
Phil Harbison
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list just send
Rick McMahan wrote:
> Maybe I should take the Queen's advice.
You should ALWAYS take the queen's advice. That's why we
have a queen! :-)
--
Phil Harbison
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and the single wo
Ohh sh*t, what did I do to deserve that below the belt punch?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 7:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [RollTideFa
The reason the defense has looked better *may be* because they haven't
faced a top notch offensive team since the LSU game. just a thought.
RTR!
Rick
Was that Rick or Huge?
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and the single word "UN
My sincere apologies to the beautiful puppies.
Seriously,
Slef
-Original Message-
From: Phillip L. Harbison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, December 02, 2001 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: [RollTideFan] Beard and Watts expected back f
This may be true, but the defense still faultered early in the season
against less-than-top-notch offenses.
-Original Message-
"The reason the defense has looked better *may be* because they haven't
faced
a top notch offensive team since the LSU game. just a thought."
That was the only
Hugh, I refer back to my original post:
"The reason the defense has looked better *may be* because they haven't
faced
a top notch offensive team since the LSU game. just a thought."
That was the only point I was *trying* to make. My apologies if I didn't
communicate that well enough in my follo
You suggested that Ole Miss had a "top notch" offense, or a better
offense than USM. I simply don't buy that based upon the way they
escaped with their lives against Vandy.
If you're suggesting that Ole Miss's offense got WORSE with time
I'm not buying that at all. If Bama had been played th
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Hugh Wolfgang
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [RollTideFan] Beard and Watts expected back for bowl game
>
>
> Ole Miss and UCLA didn't exactly thrill people with big wins at the end
> of th
Ole Miss and UCLA didn't exactly thrill people with big wins at the end
of the year, did they?
-Original Message-
Hugh, if you suggesting Aubie has a top notch offense, you're just
making
yourslef look stupid. USM is a better offense than Aubie, but they were
playing in monsoon conditio
---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Hugh Wolfgang
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 4:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [RollTideFan] Beard and Watts expected back for bowl game
>
>
> Tubby on Line 1, and he's fuming.
> Al
Tubby on Line 1, and he's fuming.
Also, don't forget, USM put up 50+ points earlier in the year - at least
once.
-Original Message-
The reason the defense has looked better *may be* because they haven't
faced
a top notch offensive team since the LSU game. just a thought.
To unsubscri
The reason the defense has looked better *may be* because they haven't faced
a top notch offensive team since the LSU game. just a thought.
RTR!
Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: crimsontidefan
> > Stating that Zow is 2-0 and that Watts is 4-5 is not a fair comparison.
> There was a big
> Stating that Zow is 2-0 and that Watts is 4-5 is not a fair comparison.
There was a big difference in Zow's games and Watts. "DEFENSE". If the
defense played these last two games as they had most of the year,
> Zow could have very well been 0-2. I'm not saying that Zow did not play
good,
-Original Message-
> Zow is 2-0 as a starter this year. Watts is 4-5.
<<
Hughbert, what have you been smoking? Crack open that piggy
bank and spend some of those casino winnings to buy a clue.
We did not lose 5 games because of Watts. In those losses,
we scored 17, 36, 24, 24, and 21
Jeff Todd wrote:
> Do you have any those puppies left? You know, the ones
> that look like blobber.
What did my puppies ever do to deserve such an insult? The
puppies don't LOOK LIKE blobber! I merely OFFERED ONE to
blobber before she went into bitch mode. To help you better
understand the dif
L. Harbison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, December 01, 2001 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [RollTideFan] Beard and Watts expected back for bowl game
>Hugh Wolfgang wrote:
>> Zow is 2-0 as a starter this year. Watts is 4-5.
>
>Hu
Hugh Wolfgang wrote:
> Zow is 2-0 as a starter this year. Watts is 4-5.
Hughbert, what have you been smoking? Crack open that piggy
bank and spend some of those casino winnings to buy a clue.
We did not lose 5 games because of Watts. In those losses,
we scored 17, 36, 24, 24, and 21 points. D
-Original Message-
> I would PLAY Tyler - if he's healthy. But I would NOT start him.
> Andrew's earned the starting job,
>>Yup. 3+ years of inconsistency as opposed to 2.2 good (back to back)
>>games.. Hell. Start the boy. Works for me.
What was inconsistent about the 10-3 SEC Ch
Hugh Wolfgang wrote:
>
> I would PLAY Tyler - if he's healthy. But I would NOT start him.
> Andrew's earned the starting job,
Yup. 3+ years of inconsistency as opposed to 2.2 good (back to back)
games.. Hell. Start the boy. Works for me.
> and it'll be his final game. Tyler's also played h
The TEAM - especially the defense - played better when Zow was in at QB.
Having said that, Zow DID drive the team for a score against UCLA (too
little too late in the game), you know.
-Original Message-
Stating that Zow is 2-0 and that Watts is 4-5 is not a fair comparison.
There was a
Kay posted:
Kay you are absolutely right, but you are wasting your time with
reasonable, common sense posts to Wolfcrank.
To unsubscribe from this list just send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
a BLANK subject line and the single word "UNSUBSCRIBE" (without the quotes) in the
body or vis
Stating that Zow is 2-0 and that Watts is 4-5 is not a fair comparison. There was a
big difference in Zow's games and Watts. "DEFENSE". If the defense played these
last two games as they had most of the year,
Zow could have very well been 0-2. I'm not saying that Zow did not play good, but
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard
>
> Just a thought here? If you were Coach Fran would you pull AZ in favor of
> TW?
No, AZ would definitely start, but TW would play a couple of series in the
first half and some in the second half as well. My reasoning; as long as TW
is healthy, he d
Zow is 2-0 as a starter this year. Watts is 4-5.
Zow is the all-time leading passer in Alabama football HISTORY - and he
was on the bench for most of the first 8 games this year.
I think Zow is the one who deserves a freaking break.
-Original Message-
JHC! Give me a freaking BREAK. Th
JHC! Give me a freaking BREAK. The only reason Zow has seen a down of
playing time in the past 5 weeks is because Watts was hurt. Zow earned crap!
Give me a break. Zow is a 2nd team QB!
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Wolfgang
Andrew's earned the starting job, and it'll be his final gam
I would PLAY Tyler - if he's healthy. But I would NOT start him.
Andrew's earned the starting job, and it'll be his final game. Tyler's
also played hard this year, though, and he deserves to play.
-Original Message-
Just a thought here? If you were Coach Fran would you pull AZ in favo
Just a thought here? If you were Coach Fran would you pull AZ in favor of
TW? If it was me? No way! AZ has proven his heart and the team has really
responded to his leadership. If I were to make the call, it would be that TW
would only play if AZ were to get hurt or played poorly. Chemistry in my
45 matches
Mail list logo
