"rick" made AR/Oracle happy again, thank you!
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5862
r5862 | rick | 2007-01-05 12:46:34 -0800 (Fri, 05 Jan 2007) | 1 line
Slight doc tweak to #prepend_filter. Closes #6493 [Jeremy Voorhis
Good evening list,
The following subtlety(?!) of the under the hood SQL magic of
ActiveRecord has, on many occasions, made me waste hours staring
blankly at SQL exceptions while wrongly blaming the ruby SQL bindings.
Ahem.
Anyway, let us assume that I have a Post model with some attributes
whos
Ah the example. I haven't put it up yet so I removed it from the
README. Thanks for the catch.
On Jan 5, 2007, at 7:53 PM, Michael Koziarski wrote:
The example app is asking for a password, perhaps you need to enable
public access to:
http://richcollins.net/svn/simply_presentable_exampl
Crap I thought I did - sorry I'll fix it
On Jan 5, 2007, at 7:53 PM, Michael Koziarski wrote:
The example app is asking for a password, perhaps you need to enable
public access to:
http://richcollins.net/svn/simply_presentable_example
On 1/6/07, Rich Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I j
The example app is asking for a password, perhaps you need to enable
public access to:
http://richcollins.net/svn/simply_presentable_example
On 1/6/07, Rich Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just released a plugin that adds presenters to rails. We have been
using it internally, so I would
I just released a plugin that adds presenters to rails. We have been
using it internally, so I would love to get some external feedback.
Please let me know what you think:
http://simply_presentable.richcollins.net/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
I was wondering if this is a bug or perhaps an issue with how I'm using filters.
When a filter chain halts, nothing is sent back to the browser by default.
During tests, if a filter chain halts, the following error occurs
because the response has no body.
NoMethodError: You have a nil object w
Thanks Michael and Koz!
/Nick
On 1/5/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
done, thanks!
On 1/6/07, Michael A. Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6825
> AR serialized attributes don't work with Oracle CLOB
>
> Thanks!
>
--~--~-~--
Okay, I just added another patch to the ticket that includes the test
cases you mentioned Koz.
On Jan 4, 8:06 pm, "Michael Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a patch which introduced the Duration class to help deal with
> unifying and making precise the datetime operations in Rails
done, thanks!
On 1/6/07, Michael A. Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6825
AR serialized attributes don't work with Oracle CLOB
Thanks!
>
--
Cheers
Koz
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are su
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6825
AR serialized attributes don't work with Oracle CLOB
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to
> When you say a "waste of time" you mean you have performance concerns
> about it or something else? It would be simple to write a common plugin
> to make this work, but I thought plugins that depend on other plugins
> are discouraged.
Well, you can now order plugins whichever way you like in
"rick" made AR/Oracle cry...
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5857
r5857 | rick | 2007-01-05 12:32:03 -0800 (Fri, 05 Jan 2007) | 1 line
Clean up multiple calls to #stringify_keys in TagHelper, add better
documentation
Michael Schoen wrote:
"rick" made AR/Oracle cry...
Please ignore, this was a conflict in my test environment.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, s
On 1/5/07, John W. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick Olson wrote:
> Personally, I'm just not in favor of this. I definitely see the
> usefulness in something like Radiant, Mephisto, anything using
> Engines, etc. But, it seems like a waste of time for every other app.
When you say a "wast
On 1/5/07, John W. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick Olson wrote:
> Personally, I'm just not in favor of this. I definitely see the
> usefulness in something like Radiant, Mephisto, anything using
> Engines, etc. But, it seems like a waste of time for every other app.
When you say a "wast
Rick Olson wrote:
Personally, I'm just not in favor of this. I definitely see the
usefulness in something like Radiant, Mephisto, anything using
Engines, etc. But, it seems like a waste of time for every other app.
When you say a "waste of time" you mean you have performance concerns
about i
On 1/5/07, Rick Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's cool about this patch is how you've got the important view
logic extracted into smaller methods such as
#lookup_template_base_path_for and #find_base_path_for. Is there any
way that we can just extract that and allow this view_paths plugin
On 1/5/07, John W. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Koziarski wrote:
> > The 1.2 boat has sailed, but perhaps there's room for something like
> > this in 2.0. A few things to consider though:
Michael and others, any other thoughts on this? I'm eager to see it
applied.
Personally,
Michael Koziarski wrote:
> The 1.2 boat has sailed, but perhaps there's room for something like
> this in 2.0. A few things to consider though:
Michael and others, any other thoughts on this? I'm eager to see it
applied.
--
John Long
http://wiseheartdesign.com
--~--~-~--~~
How about applying the documentation patches before release?
--
Thank you,
Steven A Bristol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/4/07, John Sheets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 27, 2006, at 1:54 PM, DHH wrote:
We're inches away from pulling the trigger on RC2, which is the fast
track (a few days, top
21 matches
Mail list logo
