Hello all,
I've been helping Sven Fuchs maintain the i18n gem and I'm pleased to let
you know that I'm prepping a new release of this gem (0.8.0). This new
release will affect every Rails version since Rails 3.2, so I want to make
sure this release is bullet-proof!
Included in this release
You can do this already with code like this:
wepay_config = ActiveSupport::OrderedOptions.new
wepay_config.use_stage = false
Rails.application.config.wepay = wepay_config
Accessed through Rails.application.config.wepay.use_stage
This is how the Railties (like Active
Please ask this question on the rubyonrails-talk mailing list. This list is
reserved for core discussions.
> On 24 Dec 2015, at 06:55, Amrit Kahlon wrote:
>
> What is the best way to set up a project using angular 2 and rails 5? I was
> using it with angular 1.5 and
Hi,
Please ask questions like this on the rubyonrails-talk mailing list. This list
is reserfved for discussion about the core of the Rails framework.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:00 PM, venu madhav chitta
venu.chitta1...@gmail.com wrote:
I am implementing strategy pattern in Rails where I
I think that Meghali was in the right here. This is most definitely a core
framework development question.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Rishav Rastogi rishav.rast...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Meghali,
Please use the ruby-on-rails-talk google group or stackoverflow to post
this question. This
It’s not that they have to install an extra gem that’s the problem, I think.
The problem is that Nokogiri is only used by a tiny, tiny subset of ActionView
and during the course of the application that tiny subset might not be used at
all.
The installation of Nokogiri can cause issues for
Hi there,
This list is reserved for talk about the core of the Rails framework itself.
Please ask general Rails questions on the rubyonrails-talk mailing list,
#rubyonrails channel on Freenode or on Stack Overflow under the “ruby-on-rails”
tag.
Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:45
What is the benefit of this method?
You can pluck(:firstname).map { |e| { firstname: e } } if you really wanted
that. Why are you plucking and wanting it to be a hash?
On 25 Jun 2015, at 19:59, Mike Campbell m...@huntspill.com wrote:
The regular AR pluck method returns the values only,
Changing this method's name reeks of bikeshedding.
Any one with more than a day's worth of Rails experience knows the difference
between these two methods and how to use them.
In my experience, the return value for save is almost always checked.
If we deprecate save and then have only save!,
This list is reserved for discussion around the core of the Rails framework.
For general Rails questions, please post to rubyonrails-talk, or Stack Overflow.
Thank you.
On 14 May 2015, at 17:22, ravishankar mishra ravishankar.mishr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
how we can generate 3 or 4
In what instance would people be calling destroy on your model without
realising that it's supposed to be protected? Who is this protecting the model
from?
On 27 Apr 2015, at 07:08, Yannis Kolovos yannis.kolo...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to protect my model in production of of
I think that sounds reasonable. Please submit a PR.
On 9 Feb 2015, at 03:07, Иван Бишевац ivan.bise...@gmail.com wrote:
User.find(1)
for no record with gives:
def test_error_message
begin
User.find(1)
rescue ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound = e
message = e.message
end
This is a great example of bikeshedding. I am not sure that was the
intention however.
The method name, for me, means this string is safe to display as-is in
HTML.
Teaching people that this method does this is a simple matter of educating
those people. Changing the method name to suit those who
Please elaborate.
Where do you think the site is lacking? How can we improve it?
On 20 Dec 2014, at 18:50, Anandu B Ajith reach2ana...@gmail.com wrote:
The site is having a very old design and not usable ..
shouldn't we switch to a better design in 2015??
--
You received this message
Looks good to me. I would hide the box on the right by default. Please submit a
PR for it :)
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Islam Wazery al.waz...@gmail.com wrote:
I am proposing to change the style of the index page
Can’t this be mitigated by using the bang-variant? i.e. `find_by_id!` ?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Gilburg eugene.gilb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Current behavior:
User.find_by_id(nil)
User Load (1.1ms) SELECT users.* FROM users WHERE users.id IS
NULL LIMIT 1
User.find_by_id()
Hi skt,
First of all: I would highly encourage you to upgrade immediately to at least
3.0.20.
Second: What method are you calling exactly to get that error?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:35 PM, skt stibre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am on an old version of Rails (3.0.5) and can't upgrade
Why would the community do that? What are the benefits? Why is Sprockets bad?
Why would we replace it with something that is not up to its prime? Wouldn't we
have to rewrite a whole bunch of Rails code and documentation?
So many questions.
I'm pretty hard -1 on this.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014
Replies inline.
On 29 May 2014 14:35, Michael Kaiser-Nyman michael...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello! I teach quite a few people Rails through my class, Epicodus. One
thing I've noticed is that the sheer number of files and folders `rails
new` generates is pretty intimidating for newcomers to Rails.
Go ahead and use Rails 4.1 now.
gem install rails --pre
If you find any bugs, please file them as issues :)
On 25 February 2014 at 3:09:37 pm, Sergio Campamá (sergiocamp...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Hi,
Is there a release date for 4.1? I'm starting a new project for the company I
work for, and I
IMO the scaffold controller is not designed to be used for building all parts
of your application. It's soul purpose is for you to put up a quick and dirty
controller.
Along similar lines: I strongly doubt your admin controllers are going to need
to respond to json.
I would strongly
Please ask questions like this on the rubyonrails-talk. This list is reserved
for discussion about Rails internals.
You could also try Stack Overflow.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Kanna vtrka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I need to use select_year and date_select_year tag, but i dont know how
I personally think that this should be the responsibility of the engines,
and nothing to do with Rails. Both Refinery and Spree (as examples that
spring to mind) have different opinions on how to do this
engines-that-extend-a-core-engine feature. I'm sure other things do too. I
really don't think
I think this syntax wouldn't be supported in SQLite based on this SO answer:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1474964/using-tuples-in-sql-in-clause
Maybe there is a better way to write this query?
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Rafael Almeida almeida...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would very
Hello,
This list is reserved for discussion regarding the core of the Rails framework
itself.
Your issue is due to the jk-ferret gem failing, which is outside the concern of
the Rails framework. Please contact the owner of that gem and ask them why it
is failing.
Thank you. M
On Wed, Apr
http://transitionculture.org/wp-content/uploads/bikeshed2.jpg
On 11 March 2013 07:23, Apoorv Parijat apoorvpari...@gmail.com wrote:
For a domain, say example.org, you would call example.org/ as the
root domain. The root domain points to the home page
of the website. The idea of root should
Hello,
This list is reserved for discussion regarding core Rails, not application
discussion. Please take your question to the rubyonrails-talk mailing list.
Thanks!
On 21/02/2013, at 4:17, Aydarnv nostsa...@gmail.com wrote:
I did my own auth like on my old php site, I use sessions for
I agree with José. Is there a tl;dr for this thread?
On 09/02/2013, at 6:35, José Valim jose.va...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know what the fuss is about and what needs to be documented.
Most Ruby gems (and even libs inside Ruby) require you to load the
*top-level* file in order to use it
Hi Per,
This is a question better suited for the rubyonrails-talk mailing list. This
list is reserved for discussions about the core of Rails, whereas
rubyonrails-talk is for application support QA.
Thank you!
On 23/01/2013, at 16:07, xscr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've installed
What would the usecase for this be?
On 13/01/2013, at 10:46, Steve Jorgensen ste...@stevej.name wrote:
There are times when it would be very useful to be able to get the Arel for
any given ActiveRecord action such as a creation or update without actually
carrying out the action.
I'm
Thank you, Aaron, for your work on Rails!
3 3 3
On 03/01/2013, at 8:35, Aaron Patterson tenderl...@ruby-lang.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:28:36PM -0800, Aaron Patterson wrote:
Rails versions 3.2.10, 3.1.9, and 3.0.18 have been released. These releases
contain an important
I think that this is something that would differ incredibly from app to app.
For instance, I would not install Ruby using apt-get myself.
While I like the idea of having it be a Getting Started doc for an app, I
don't think that Rails could come with a cohesive default that would work for
and Steve,
Ryan Bigg already worked on the Getting Started guide sometime ago and made
it a lot simpler. One of the changes was removing the early references to
REST -
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/2f06c94e38a116fdfa43d7b7117e6bf911a0bff5
Please check the edge guides to see
This explanation seems almost schizophrenic.
What are you trying to say? Could you slow down and explain it in more
elaborate terms please?
On 18/10/2012, at 6:22, Alexander Kurakin kuraga...@mail.ru wrote:
I think that links' authors know better than me all of causes. But I use
render
You can already use ActiveSupport::Callbacks for this. I think the
documentation for this class is thorough and should give you a good
understand of how it works.
On 18 October 2012 06:21, Alexander Kurakin kuraga...@mail.ru wrote:
Suggestion: to extract
I think the answer here that Rafael gave is spot-on. The migration tasks
that come with Rails are designed with one database in mind. If you're
operating with multiple databases, then you should create your own
migration tasks that migrate your databases for you.
On 16 October 2012 07:27, Jesse
-1 on this also for reasons Piotr explained.
On 09/10/2012, at 8:13, Nickolas sir.nicko...@gmail.com wrote:
It does only half of the job. It changes the content of the parameter passed,
but not it's name.
The idea is to be able to change the name.
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 12:03:54 AM
Any Rails release timeline announcements are generally wrong, anyway.
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 9:49 AM, Jeremy Walker wrote:
On 1 October 2012 00:43, Steve Klabnik st...@steveklabnik.com
(mailto:st...@steveklabnik.com) wrote:
Soonish. There are some things that are blocking the
, roles whatever my gem wants
to provide)
I am under the impression that these parts are not open to extension at
present.
Cheers
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 Sep 2012, at 21:21, Ryan Bigg radarl...@gmail.com (javascript:)
wrote:
[This email will arrive approx 15 hours
[This email will arrive approx 15 hours after I've written it. Sorry if there's
been talk on this post by that stage that I am ignoring]
I'm not sure I can agree with such a feature being a part of Rails just yet.
There is currently many different approaches to designing APIs with Rails,
going
To see how much work Carlos (and team) did during Railsconf, look at this handy
graph I drew up about a month ago:
https://skitch.com/radarlistener/e15qy/rails-issues
That big dip at the end of the graph is thanks to the volunteers who've been
working super hard on keeping that ticket count
-1
I don't think this feature would be useful to the majority of Rails developers
out there, sorry.
You could always release it as a separate gem and get people to use it that
way.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Friday, 10 August 2012 at 0:59, Stephen Touset wrote:
In several places in Rails (e.g
kinda sucked before 3.1. Now a lot more people are using
them.
+1 for the list.
On Jul 21, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Andrew Kaspick wrote:
Here's a past one...
http://www.mail-archive.com/engine-users@lists.rails-engines.org/
dead!
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Ryan Bigg
rails-talk is a ghetto.
A new engines list would be best.
On Saturday, 21 July 2012 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Kaspick wrote:
Engine lists have been created in the past, but they're not very active or
are dead.
-1 to a new engine list and +1 to just asking the questions in rails-talk
first
This is a general Rails question and not related to the core development of the
framework. Please refrain from asking such questions on this list.
Instead, ask them on rubyonrails-talk or StackOverflow.
Thanks!
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 2:49 AM, Anu wrote:
I have rails app which uses
We're currently discussing the best way to do this on Forem's issue #260
(https://github.com/radar/forem/pull/260). Kunal there wants to add methods to
or modify the Forem::Post class, and so we're going to go with the
app/decorators directory for that.
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 5:49 AM,
Very limited use-case. Can't see the point of it.
-1
On Monday, 9 July 2012 at 3:58 PM, angelo capilleri wrote:
Many users try to overwrite the to_param method of AR to add more
expressivness and value of Seo to the url using something like the
following:
def to_param
id.to_s + title.
For the record: I don't mention attr_protected at all in Rails 3 in Action
either.
+1 to removing attr_protected.
On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 11:57 AM, Peter Brown wrote:
Just a guy with an opinion weighing in... I would love to see attr_protected
removed. The official Rails Guide on
I agree with Steve. Would love to see a reasoned discussion on what you'd
replace FactoryGirl with.
p.s. My test setup is better than your test setup.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 6:54, Steve Klabnik wrote:
Factories and factory_girl are one of the worst things to ever happen
No, they should not. They are used rather extensively in the Active Record
tests.
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 7:56 AM, Olek Janiszewski wrote:
Thanks everyone for sharing your feelings about FactoryGirl, but that's not
what I care about :). I consider this off-topic, please start a separate
Hi Yusuke,
This looks like a general Rails question. Please ask this question on the
rubyonrails-talk mailing list. This list is reserved for core Rails discussion.
Thanks!
On Tuesday, 3 July 2012 at 6:42 AM, Yusuke Enomoto wrote:
Hello.I have a question. I am making chat application to
Please post this to rubyonrails-talk. This list is reserved for discussion
about core development of Ruby on Rails. For general issues, post them to
rubyonrails-talk.
Thanks.
On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 6:00 AM, yatta20 wrote:
Hello, I'm a newbie. I need help resolving this issue. I
rubyonrails-talk is that list.
On Saturday, 23 June 2012 at 6:58 AM, A L wrote:
Thanks Richard. Do you happen to know of any qa forum specific for rails
users?
Thanks for the pointer!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Core
This seems like a discussion better suited on rubyonrails-talk. I don't see how
it pertains to the core of the framework.
On Wednesday, 6 June 2012 at 9:44 PM, Jarl Friis wrote:
Hi.
I amn just upgrading a project from 2.3.12 to 3.0.11.
I have come pretty long, my unit tests succeeds,
Hi Michael,
This is the Ruby on Rails Core list, used for discussions about the Rails
framework itself.
For discussion about apps built using Rails, go to the rubyonrails-talk mailing
list.
Thanks!
--
Ryan Bigg
On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 at 3:10, Michael Boutros wrote:
Hello all
Oh, reading this again it seems I was wrong.
How would it guess the associations?
--
Ryan Bigg
On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 at 3:10, Michael Boutros wrote:
Hello all,
I'm working on a Rails app and I have resources nested three deep - let's
call them user, project, and issues
for that and it will still work.
Please be more careful about what lists you post to in the future.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 at 18:30, Panayotis Matsinopoulos wrote:
HI,
I have the following in my routes:
resources :photos, :except = [:new, :edit]
When I get /photos
Indeed, the application's app/controllers/application_controller.rb will take
precedence over a similarly named file in the engine. The same goes for
anything else in the app directory, too.
This is why you namespace your engine: to avoid collisions such as these.
On Thursday, 24 May 2012
I've been developing engines (Forem: https://github.com/radar/forem and Spree:
https://github.com/spree/spree) for a while, and I've always chosen to make the
engine's ApplicationController inherit from the application's
ApplicationController for the reasons you point out: you get access to all
require_dependency is designed to be used for the purposes you describe.
A lot of things aren't documented in the Rails API that are public. Doesn't
mean that you shouldn't use them.
On Saturday, 7 April 2012 at 9:28 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
If so, shouldn't it be documented in
them assets, but maybe locales can be at least in
app/ directory?
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 11:40:51 PM UTC+2, Ryan Bigg wrote:
You're right that they're not downloadable. They're still used in the
process of generating assets that are downloadable. The ones
You're right that they're not downloadable. They're still used in the process
of generating assets that are downloadable. The ones that are downloadable live
in public/assets anyway.
On Wednesday, 4 April 2012 at 4:34 PM, Alexey wrote:
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 11:25:26 PM UTC+2, Josh
that too.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 8:09, Adam Hawkins wrote:
Is there anything we can do about the Work in Progress Guides? Some of them
have been WIP for a while. What are they missing? Is there a list somewhere?
Let me know if there is anything I can do.
--
You
Please ask questions like this on the rubyonrails-talk mailing list. Core is
reserved for discussion about the actual framework itself, rather than
applications/engines built on top of it.
There's also an engines guide you could read:
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/engines.html
On Thursday,
Check out the generators guide. It contains info about how to modify the
default generators.
On 10/03/2012, at 5:20, pferdefleisch pferdeflei...@gmail.com wrote:
Quick question.
Many posters have referred to creating their own custom scaffold
generators instead of using the defaults.
What
On Friday, 9 March 2012 at 10:16 AM, Colin Law wrote:
On 9 March 2012 18:06, Steve Klabnik st...@steveklabnik.com
(mailto:st...@steveklabnik.com) wrote:
Scaffolds are a boon to someone trying to work it out for themselves
and they provide the instant gratification Wow factor that lets
Replies inline. You may want to ensure you have supplies before reading this.
It's a bit long.
On Friday, 9 March 2012 at 6:45 AM, Trek Glowacki wrote:
So, just to recap the flow of this conversation for myself:
a) We, as developers *of* Rails (or at least those who lurk here), realize
Hello friends,
It's been fun having the scaffold generator exist as a part of Rails since The
Beginning Of Time, but I think its time is now up. It has been abused time and
time again, and most often leads to confusion amongst people who are new to
Rails.
This confusion happens when a user
there was the removal of the scaffold method from the controllers. A
major version then was the perfect time for that, and over time tutorials
adjusted. If it was removed here, the same thing would occur.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Ryan Bigg radarliste...@gmail.com
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 11:30 AM, Elomar Souza wrote:
Can anyone please elaborate on the disadvantages of using the scaffold? :)
This helpful Stack Overflow question should display why teaching noobs scaffold
first off is a bad thing: http://stackoverflow.com/revisions/9622251/1.
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 12:15 PM, Mark Peterson wrote:
You've got to be kidding? Why do these people waste their time with such
pointless syntactical changes
This is what would be gauged as rage here. They're not *pointless* syntax
changes. They're adapting to the shorter syntax for
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 4:06 PM, Andrés Mejía wrote:
I don't mean to offend, but you are one of the most annoying people to ever
write to this list.
Fire, meet gasoline.
i.e. This is not the way to deal with people like that. Insults will only
generate more insults. Let's not do that,
Hi,
This list is reserved for the discussion of Rails core components. For
questions about external gems such as devise, please ask on Rubyonrails-talk,
the devise mailing list itself or Stackoverflow.
Thanks!
On 31/12/2011, at 15:45, pocket poketo7...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I'm using
Nope, I think the current way of doing things is just fine.
On 20/12/2011, at 9:51, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
From a web application point of view, you're usually done after you deliver
some content to the client, which in Rails means a render or redirect call
You should log a bug on GitHub, Rails is not using Lighthouse anymore.
Personally, I've not used `rake notes`, but others may find that functionality
useful.
On Tuesday, 6 December 2011 at 7:31 AM, Dee wrote:
It doesn't look like SourceAnnotationExtractor was updated to include
the asset
normally the
AJAX calls are working just fine).
On Aug 25, 7:49 pm, Ryan Bigg radarliste...@gmail.com (http://gmail.com)
wrote:
A short guess: Something is not calling Bundler.require(Rails.env,
:default) as what would normally happen in Rails, like in the default
config
Please post these types of questions to the rubyonrails-talk mailing list.
rubyonrails-core is reserved for discussion about the internals of the
framework.
On Tuesday, 6 September 2011 at 11:01 AM, B.Tag wrote:
I encountered the following problem with sqlite3:
databases table:
I think due to the large number of testing frameworks out there for JavaScript,
we should leave this in the developer's hands and not make it a part of the
Rails core.
On 31/08/2011, at 23:06, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
While reading the 3.1 release notes
A short guess: Something is not calling Bundler.require(Rails.env, :default)
as what would normally happen in Rails, like in the default
config/application.rb. Does putting this line in your engine.rb make it work?
On Friday, 26 August 2011 at 9:19 AM, Wolfram Arnold, RubyFocus wrote:
I'm
Agreed. This is not a rails-core issue. Please ask this on the
rubyonrails-talk mailing list instead.
On Wednesday, 17 August 2011 at 7:55 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
The obvious omission from your post is the platform on which you deploy
rails. This is where responsibility lies, and it
The changelog link is here:
https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v2.3.12...v2.3.14
(https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v2.1.12...v2.1.14). Just got the minor
number wrong, which is a minor problem.
Thanks again for your fabulous work Aaron!
On Wednesday, 17 August 2011 at 9:32 AM,
Please have this discussion on the rubyonrails-talk mailing list. This list is
reserved for issues relating to the core functionality of Rails itself, such as
bug reports, new feature discussions and so on.
Thank you.
On Wednesday, 3 August 2011 at 3:02 PM, Bruce Dou wrote:
You can call
Please ask this question on Rubyonrails-talk. It seems like you are defining
your Post model in a file incorrectly named / located.
On 13/07/2011, at 22:04, M Bougie mathi...@socialship.net wrote:
Can you change something in this kind of relationship, because it
works great in previous
where(LOWER(email) = ?, email) isn't good enough?
On Tuesday, 28 June 2011 at 6:07 AM, Tristan Hill wrote:
It would be useful for issues such as http://www.redmine.org/issues/2473
(Login and mail should not be case sensitive) to support case
insensitive finds via the dynamic finders. This is
Nik: Specify this line in your Gemfile:
gem 'sprockets', '2.0.0.beta10'
Make sure there isn't one there for 2.0.0.beta11 or anything else mentioning
sprockets.
Then run bundle update sprockets. This will change it to the correct version.
On Friday, 24 June 2011 at 11:13 AM, Nik wrote:
I
Have you tried cloning this into a local dir and specifying that as a path like
this:
gem 'sprockets', :path = vendor/sprockets
And then attempt to run a git bisect over that directory to figure out what, if
anything, broke between beta10 and beta11? I mean, you *do* have good and bad
refs to
Oh, and I can confirm this issue.
I would have thought this would have been picked up before beta11 was released,
given it's basically *the* functionality in Sprockets.
On Wednesday, 22 June 2011 at 9:05 AM, Ryan Bigg wrote:
Have you tried cloning this into a local dir and specifying
Pipped to the post!
Nice work Guilermo!
On 20/06/2011, at 5:51, Guillermo Iguaran guilleigua...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do it with config.assets.prefix = /something
--
Guillermo Iguaran
Sent with Sparrow
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Joel Moss wrote:
Seems that introducing
I would have this helper module inside a namespace within the engine, which
will allow people to have a similarly named one in the application. In the
application's helper, then I would just include the engine's one, the process
of which would make those methods available in the application
This should also be fixed in the next release of Rails 3.0.x
On 09/06/2011, at 3:21, Konstantin Shababov m...@etehtsea.me wrote:
you can fix this using output_buffer = output_buffer.slice(pos..-1) instead
of using slice!
--
Konstantin Shababov
http://github.com/etehtsea
Sent with
This should now be fixed with the 3.1.2 release of Haml:
https://rubygems.org/gems/haml/versions/3.1.2.
On Wednesday, 8 June 2011 at 11:40 AM, Michael Koziarski wrote:
Only way I can avoid the error is if I remove everything from
application.haml below %body
Could this be the culprit?
Yes, it turns off test unit generators for your controllers and models but you
can still access them through those helpers if you wish.
On 27/05/2011, at 4:09, EMoreth everton.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
When creating a new rails project (3.1.0.rc1) with no test unit
options, it still create
(to add initial support for
associations) waiting for review:
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/230
--
Guillermo Iguaran
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Nicolás Sanguinetti wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Ryan BIgg radarliste
Please do submit these patches to the Rails project itself. It doesn't matter
if you think are poorly written. They will be reviewed and you will get
feedback on them, learning how to write better code and understand the Rails
code as you do it.
You're not learning if you're not doing.
On
Please ask this question on the rubyonrails-talk mailing list. This list is for
issues about the Rails core itself.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Friday, 15 April 2011 at 4:31 PM, femto Zheng wrote:
Hello, all,
I'm using rails and ruport
but require 'ruport/util' in my rails application doesn't work
Please ask this question on the rubyonrails-talk mailing list, as this list is
for issues pertaining to the core framework and is not for issues involving
your application.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Monday, 11 April 2011 at 4:22 PM, adrianberenguel wrote:
HI TO ALL
I want to display a specific
There's actually been quite a few suggestions to move away from Lighthouse,
there just wasn't a good enough alternative on the market. I think that with
the new GitHub issues there's a high chance that Rails will be moving there
shortly.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Monday, 11 April 2011 at 5:51 PM
Hello!
I've gained access to this repository this morning and have pulled in all the
pull requests. I had somebody try it out but would like more people to give it
a go.
If you have a Rails 2 app handy please try it and report any issues you have.
On 08/04/2011, at 3:23, Peer Allan
Did your rails g generate the KnownIP model or the KnownIp model? Your post
says both.
On 04/04/2011, at 0:20, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Using Rails 3.0.5 is it expected that
ruby-1.8.7-p302 KnownIP.tableize
= known_ips
rather than known_i_ps as I had expected?
The
, if nobody else is.
--
Ryan Bigg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo