> On Jul 25, 2017, at 4:00 PM, Jaco Pretorius wrote:
> On Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 4:08:34 PM UTC-5, Steve Klabnik wrote:
> Minitest is already in the standard library, so you're not really
> adding or removing any meaningful dependence.
> I just found this thread after noticing the same
I just found this thread after noticing the same dependency today and
looking for a way to potentially remove this. I don't quite see a
dependency on minitest in the 'standard library' (by which I assume you
mean the Rails gem itself).
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/rails.gemspec
Minitest is already in the standard library, so you're not really
adding or removing any meaningful dependence.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an emai
Hi Brian,
I think to we start to consider doing this we will need a stronger reason
than load less code for production Rails apps. AFAIK, we don't require
active_support/test_case in production environment so we are not loading
minitest at production too.
If that is the case we should fix this, b
I followed down the path of why my app was bringing in 'minitest' in
production and noticed that activesupport has a dependency on minitest. I
wondered why it wasn't a development dependency and then it dawned on me
that it was necessary for ActiveSupport::TestCase.
What does the core team thi