For me, it's because writing markup intended for human beings in a
programmatic style doesn't give me any visual clues as to how it's going to
look. The whitespace is a convenient but only inciental way of achieving
that.
Builder is totally fine when I'm outputting formatted data like XML
RVM gemsets will help you manage multiple versions of Rails on a single
system, but the real problem you have is managing the risk that something in
your app will be broken by the upgrade. If you've got reasonable test
coverage on your application, you'll probably be able to shortcut the
process
When a nested form submitted to the create action contains missing
data, the form is redisplayed and the nested values the user entered
remain. When submitting the same nested form to the update action,
the newly entered values remain for the parent record, but the child
records revert back to
On Mar 25, 3:01 am, Alex Goldsmith li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
I get what HAML's about, and that it's better than ERB, but why not go
with something completely Ruby along the lines of XML Builder?
markaby does that, and there are people who love that too. Each to
their own!
Fred
Then you
On Mar 25, 3:07 am, sol.manager sol.mana...@gmail.com wrote:
So, two questions. When I compare the two I see differences in the
structure. Our current 2.1.0 site test had the following:
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../test_helper'
class JobPostTest Test::Unit::TestCase
fixtures
Yes
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Me chabg...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this normal US working hours?
--
Many Thanks Regards
Imran Ahmed
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
run this command
*gem i mysql2*
*
*
*in command prompt and den check*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On 24 March 2011 14:53, Linus Pettersson linus.petters...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
When I started my project I generated some scaffolding for my
frontend. Now I want to generate some standard scaffolding again, in
my /admin area.
If I simply do rails generate scaffold admin/posts
I get a
Hello
I have 2 application one as a client another as a server i want to
send a request client application to server application how can i do it
using ruby on rails plz reply me as a soon as possible.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are
On 25 March 2011 03:07, sol.manager sol.mana...@gmail.com wrote:
In my efforts to upgrade our site from 2.1.0 to 3.0.x, I have upgraded
to 2.2.2 and the site works, but I am working on understanding tests,
fixtures and the whole deal.
If your app does not already have decent tests, so you are
Please provide (a lot) more information about the two applications if you
want to get constructive answers.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Pranoti Patil li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Hello
I have 2 application one as a client another as a server i want to
send a request client application to
*follow this procedure:-*
*STEP 1:- INSTALL RUBY 1.9.2*
*STEP 2:- INSTALL RUBY GEMS*
*STEP 3:- OPEN COMMAND PROMPT TYPE *
* gem install rails --include-dependencies*
*STEP 4:- gem i dbi*
* gem i devise*
* gem i globalize*
*STEP 5:- gem i mysql2*
*if still
On 25 March 2011 09:23, salim mandrekar mandrekar.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
if still same problem arises mail me on mandrekar.sa...@gmail.com
no - please keep it on list so the next time someone has this problem,
they can search and find the answer/
--
You received this message because you are
*im using mysql as a database*
*
*
*im getting the error which says that *
ActiveRecord::ConnectionNotEstablished in GreetingsController#index
ActiveRecord::ConnectionNotEstablished
Rails.root: C:/railsdev/hello
Application Trace http://localhost:3000/# | Framework
dear rahul
i was also having the same problem while installing the ruby on rails and
using Netbeans. but now its solved..
i'll suggest u please follow the above mentioned steps and den install
Netbeans..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on
Hi, i have newly discovered Rails , and currently trying to write a
plugin.
the problem is that i couldn't find any generators script (like script/
generate or rails generate) to add models or migrations.
i want to add them smoothly like in the standard application.
i need your help.
thanks in
On Mar 24, 5:48 pm, sol.manager sol.mana...@gmail.com wrote:
We have an app that is at Rails 2.1.0 and our web developer has let us
know going to 3.0 will cost some money. I have embarked on a personal
project to see what is involved in getting from 2.1.0 to 3.0. I have
the app up and
Hi, i have newly discovered Rails and currently trying to write a
plugin from scratch.
I want to know how the generation of ressources(scaffold , models,...)
within a plugin could be.
this thing goes smoothly in Rails standard application because there's
script/generate or rails generate.
But in
I tried to find some help in the Passenger group without luck. I would
not like to use mysql2 gem (it gives an error too) because in
production I have to use mysql gem anyway. I moved to Passenger 3 and
I am not able to run a Rails 2 and a 3 apps. They both uses Passenger
3 (latest) and ree
On Mar 24, 3:23 pm, Linus Pettersson linus.petters...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now I want to create a list of, say, the 30 latest songs added to my
site. I'm trying to be restful and not add new actions, so how do I
achieve this? It is a index action but with some extra filters
like ...limit(30) and
On Mar 25, 12:10 pm, rtacconi rtacc...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to find some help in the Passenger group without luck. I would
not like to use mysql2 gem (it gives an error too) because in
production I have to use mysql gem anyway. I moved to Passenger 3 and
I am not able to run a Rails 2
We have a three month contract (maybe longer) for an amazing Ruby dev
to come and help us build some prototype/proof of concept products at
our studio in London.
We've been given money by the UK Technology Strategy Board to create
three proof of concept public services. That means no clients or
I'm intrested, send me email at ajcub...@gmail.com for more detials
Thanks!
Andre
On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:43 PM, Nick Marsh choosen...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a three month contract (maybe longer) for an amazing Ruby dev
to come and help us build some prototype/proof of concept products at
Is your database.yml file set up? You have created the DB and ran
migrations?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
I don't know if this is feasable in your case, but I'd be tempted to
start a brand new project in Rails 3, try to get the Gemfile correct
and work out problems there, generate scaffolding for all your
controllers, etc, from scratch, then use a diff tool to move your
existing code into the new
+1 on this, me too, i thought I can upgrade easily but it's different so I used
RVM.
So from 2.3.8 to 3.0.1 rails using RVM
Thanks!
Andre
On Mar 25, 2011, at 11:22 PM, Paul p...@nines.org wrote:
I don't know if this is feasable in your case, but I'd be tempted to
start a brand new project
I'm looking to define dynamic classes, and in order to get them to
play nicely with Rails I need them to behaving like a constantly
defiend class.
foo = Class.new
Won't work AFAIK because
foo.class == Class
If the new class is defined to a constant however it will work.
Foo = Class.new
So
On Mar 25, 3:44 pm, PsiPro arjes...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to define dynamic classes, and in order to get them to
play nicely with Rails I need them to behaving like a constantly
defiend class.
foo = Class.new
Won't work AFAIK because
foo.class == Class
Well that should always be
On 25 March 2011 15:44, PsiPro arjes...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to define dynamic classes, and in order to get them to
play nicely with Rails I need them to behaving like a constantly
defiend class.
and then I can define new class as I see fit. However I do not want to
use eval if I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2011 11:22 AM, Paul wrote:
I don't know if this is feasable in your case, but I'd be tempted to
start a brand new project in Rails 3, try to get the Gemfile correct
and work out problems there, generate scaffolding for all your
Hello, can anyone simply tell me if what i want to do is ok to do with
Rails, or will there arise some serious obstacle?
If it is ok to do, then i will probably figure out a way ofter some
trial and error.
Any other suggestion will also be appreciated.
I want to share the primary key among
Hmmm, I tried but didn't worked.
Thanks for reply!
On 25 mar, 13:36, Aldo Italo li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
try this on the top of you seed.rb:
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
--
Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 25 March 2011 16:01, Alexey M. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Hello, can anyone simply tell me if what i want to do is ok to do with
Rails, or will there arise some serious obstacle?
If it is ok to do, then i will probably figure out a way ofter some
trial and error.
Any other suggestion will
try this on the top of you seed.rb:
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Hello all. This is a rails 3 oriented question.
I'm creating a simple, application-wide view-helper method in my
app/helpers/application_helper.rb that will be called in the context of
several different controller/action views.
module ApplicationHelper
def my_custom_link_to
link_to Here
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #988949:
On Mar 23, 8:52pm, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
params[:controller].singularize.constantize.responds_to(:viewable)
Presumably this is the line throwing the error. If params[:controller]
is users then you'll be calling
constantize on the
Colin, probably my life will be much easier, but much less fun.
It is just so natural to use the same primary key in this situation.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Gabriel Sobrinho
gabriel.sobri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
First look this vulnerability issue:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-3933
My application models: http://pastie.org/1709174
On my departments form, when user selects a health
On 25 March 2011 16:47, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
...
It works but I dont like that I am checking whether a model has the
method viewable just to display a link to a detail view in the table.
Is there a better way to determine if the current controller's table
should contain a
On 25 March 2011 16:47, Alexey M. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Colin, probably my life will be much easier, but much less fun.
Are you sure? Trying to force rails away from its preferred
conventions is rarely fun. Do it the easy way and use the time saved
to indulge in something that is really
It is certainly possible to do what you're describing, and yes, the same
person *could* be both an instructor and a member at the same time.
However, I'll second Colin's suggestion that you just follow the convention
to have a separate id primary key column in both the instructors and members
Hi,
I just read a posting at,
http://railsblog.kieser.net/2010/03/working-with-postgres-views-rails.html,
which addresses the issue of Posgresql Views and Rails Models and user
security.
I was thinking of trying to implement some of the suggestions made in
this posting but thought I would ask if
It is just so natural to use the same primary key in this situation.
Why?
Well, it seems natural to me, and i often trust my senses :).
I have been playing with it in console for a few minutes now and
observing some fun and weird behavior:
i = Instructor.create
i.id# = 1
i.person_id
Hi all
database yml--
development:
adapter: mysql2
database: db_test
username: root
password:
--
i have installed mysql2 and 64bit mysql server.
when i run rake db:create it gives me this errror
does any one know whats happening here?
macbook:test_proj rathod$
It appears from your console session you never added the #set_primary_key
macro method call to you Instructor class. I just duplicated your console
session as follows in a test project only *with* the set_primary_key call as
follows:
i = Instructor.create
i.id # = 1
i.person_id # = 1
Looks prettier @ http://bit.ly/dRaTCm if you want it :) Anyone I'm a bit
stumped here.
Error:
No route matches {:controller=users, :action=confirm,
:username=Mohammad,
:code=%242a%2410%24%2FN5mhFlnu.VJ.DMdzh3ob.%2FQAbSb82nHZuZDAl%2F27726MKm6kfLbW}
Route:
get 'users/confirm/:username/:code' =
Can you explain the problem you're facing that's lead you to determine
that dynamic classes are the solution?
It may be that people could suggest alternate solutions that might not
depend on the same functionality...
I currently have a table-less model that is a SearchModel, it has
attributes
Kendall, thank's for your suggestion, it really made id and
person_id equivalent for instructors and stopped the described above
weird (and fun) behavior.
Also,
p=Person.create
m=p.create_member
i=p.create_instructor
work as expected now with setting identical values for p.id, m.id,
On 25 March 2011 17:15, Alexey M. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
It is just so natural to use the same primary key in this situation.
Why?
Well, it seems natural to me, and i often trust my senses :).
I have been playing with it in console for a few minutes now and
observing some fun and
On 25 Mar 2011, at 04:27, Seth Willits lists@ruby-forum.
...except that doing this, Rails interprets the datetime the user
entered in my configured default time zone (UTC). Instead, I need to use
the time zone the user specified. So after failing to find any good way
to do this, it seems
When I change the Rails gem version from 2.2.2 to 2.3.4 and restart
the site, I get:
Error message:
undefined local variable or method `version_requirements' for
#Rails::GemDependency:0x102b8d988
Exception class:
NameError
I did some investigating and realized that on my system I cannot
generate
On 25 Mar 2011, at 16:47, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #988949:
On Mar 23, 8:52pm, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
if
params[:controller].singularize.capitalize.constantize.method_defined?
:viewable
Why not just
I have been debating this same thing. There are so many changes that
have been made since our site was first built (late 2006) that I
almost wonder if starting a clean site from blank, fixing all the gems
that need replacing, replacing test with Rspec and then regenerating
the models, controllers
On 25 Mar 2011, at 17:24, Rajesh B. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Hi all
database yml--
development:
adapter: mysql2
database: db_test
username: root
password:
--
i have installed mysql2 and 64bit mysql server.
when i run rake db:create it gives me this
Just a follow-up to my own post, another reason I'm looking for an
alternative method here (besides being more idiomatic) is to support a
version that can add query-string parameters (and a fragment identifier) to
the generated url:
Example Version 2:
module ApplicationHelper
def
A relevant question that i think is appropriate for this thread: can
anybody please explain to me the purpose of primary_key type in context
of migrations:
t.primary_key :person_id
?
The migration
class CreateInstructors ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
create_table :instructors do |t|
I have a highly-normalized user model called Respondent. It has many
join fields such as ethnicity_id, education_id, etc. that define
relational categories. Most of them are indexed. For reasons unknown,
Rails is hitting a huge number of the tables when accessing any
Respondent objects. For
On 25 Mar 2011, at 18:34, Taylor Strait li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
I have a highly-normalized user model called Respondent. It has many
join fields such as ethnicity_id, education_id, etc. that define
relational categories. Most of them are indexed. For reasons unknown,
Rails is hitting a
Looks prettier @ http://bit.ly/dRaTCm if you want it :) Anyone I'm a bit
stumped here.
Error:
No route matches {:controller=users, :action=confirm,
:username=Mohammad,
:code=%242a%2410%24%2FN5mhFlnu.VJ.DMdzh3ob.%2FQAbSb82nHZuZDAl%2F27726MKm6kfLbW}
Route:
get
Just on more related question (if anyone has time to answer):
if i have set_primary_key 'person_id':
class Instructor ActiveRecord::Base
set_primary_key 'person_id'
...
end
does it mean that writing
class Person ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :instructor, :primary_key = 'person_id'
end
I have an Ingredient which has a Measurement.
class Ingredient ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :measurement
belongs_to :recipe
accepts_nested_attributes_for :measurement
end
class Measurement ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :ingredient
end
The schemas appear right:
create_table
On 25 March 2011 20:24, R. K. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
I have an Ingredient which has a Measurement.
class Ingredient ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :measurement
belongs_to :recipe
accepts_nested_attributes_for :measurement
end
class Measurement ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to
Hey all,
I'm trying to fully understand what this method in Ruby does. Basically
it passes a collection of records from the database (using the Rails
find method) into the argument list as a local variable called
resources. It assigns the local variable to an instance variable called
I have deleted one of my questions because i was apparently confused.
Anyway, i do not understand the use of :primary_key parameter in has_one
option like in
has_one :something, :primary_key = 'someone_id'
What is it for if the primary key has to be set with set_primary_key =
'someone_id' ?
On 25 March 2011 20:33, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm trying to fully understand what this method in Ruby does. Basically
it passes a collection of records from the database (using the Rails
find method) into the argument list as a local variable called
resources. It
Hi Fred, thanks for the reply. Does rails execute validations when
simply showing the object? My assumption is that validations were only
called before_create.
Taylor
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
John Merlino wrote in post #989291:
((@all_resources.size - 1) / @limit).to_i + 1
What does the size method do and why add one at the end?
Suppose 100 records, with a page size of 30
num_pages = ((100-1)/30)
num_pages = 99/30
num_pages = 3.3
num_pages = 3 (to_i)
num_pages = 4
3 full pages
Nick Marsh wrote in post #989203:
That means no clients or anything
Oh but you DO have clients, you just don't know them yet.
Involve elements of your projected user base(s) now, and you might find
a much higher adoption rate later...
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You
On 25 Mar 2011, at 20:51, Taylor Strait li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Hi Fred, thanks for the reply. Does rails execute validations when
simply showing the object? My assumption is that validations were only
called before_create.
The validations aren't run, but when you do
For the situation described in this thread where your Person class's
#has_one :instructor refers to another class (and table) that in fact HAS a
column named person_id then there is no need to provide the :primary_key
option, as this is what it will infer by default.
However, in even weirder
Thanks Fred - that was very helpful. Is there a more efficient way to
validate inclusion of that doesn't tax the database so heavily?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to
On Mar 25, 9:50 pm, Taylor Strait li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Thanks Fred - that was very helpful. Is there a more efficient way to
validate inclusion of that doesn't tax the database so heavily?
Well personally I'd just use a foreign key constraint, but you could
use validates presence of
On Mar 25, 4:56 am, Surya raj.sury...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thanks for your kind response, Frederick. I have finally sort it out. It was
my csv file which was in UTF-61le format, I made a new file with UITF-8
format and that worked as the way I wanted.
One more thing I wants to ask
Colin Law wrote in post #989292:
On 25 March 2011 20:24, R. K. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
belongs_to :ingredient
t.datetime created_at
t.string equivalent
t.datetime created_at
t.datetime updated_at
end
It is the belongs_to object that should have the foreign key, so
measurement
Hi there,
In the past I've purchased website designs from various places, but
have always needed to do a fair bit of adaptation to get the designs
plugged into my Rails websites.
I have been Googling around for, but have yet to find, any repository
of community contributed website designs that
Suppose 90 records...
((90-1)/30).to_i + 1 = 3, 3 full pages
It's just some math hijinks to make sure any partial page isn't missed
in the page count.
Thanks that was very helpful.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:38 AM, heithem nouira heithem.nou...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, i have newly discovered Rails , and currently trying to write a
plugin.
the problem is that i couldn't find any generators script (like script/
generate or rails generate) to add models or migrations.
i want
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:37 AM, heithem nouira heithem.nou...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, i have newly discovered Rails and currently trying to write a
plugin from scratch.
I want to know how the generation of ressources(scaffold , models,...)
within a plugin could be.
this thing goes smoothly in
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #989266:
On 25 Mar 2011, at 16:47, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #988949:
On Mar 23, 8:52pm, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
if
params[:controller].singularize.capitalize.constantize.method_defined?
Msan Msan wrote in post #937930:
I've installed rails_upgrade plugin with ruby script/plugin install
http://github.com/rails/rails_upgrade.git.
Then if I run rake rails:upgrade:check it says
rake aborted!
no such file to load -- initializer
What I've missed?
I'm having the exact same
To further clarify (and answer one of the questions above):
You must specify the :primary_key option to #has_one (and #has_many) in your
model definition if, and only if, the table of the resource that owns the
other record (i.e., the table associated w/the model that contains the
#has_one
When I run the 'bundle install' command from the main directory of my
ruby on rails (version 3) app, I get the following error:
Installing sqlite3 (1.3.3) with native extensions
C:/jruby-1.6.0.RC2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/installer.rb:529:in
`build_extensions': ERROR: Failed to build gem
Okay, since I've got no response and since the traffic here is high enough
that this topic will be effectively buried soon, I'll follow up with my
final solution.
I decided what would be nice is a universal #link_to_self helper method. The
idea is that it otherwise works just like the existing
Hi,
I cloned a git repo and then loaded up my terminal and typed: rails
server. It's worked normally but this time I keep on getting the error:
-[31mCould not find activesupport-3.0.5 in any of the sources-[0m
anyone know why this is?
(can't fire up rails console either)
--
Posted via
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gaba Luschi li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Hi,
I cloned a git repo and then loaded up my terminal and typed: rails
server. It's worked normally but this time I keep on getting the error:
-[31mCould not find activesupport-3.0.5 in any of the sources-[0m
On Mar 25, 12:07 am, MaggotChild hsomob1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is it possible to retain nested data across form redisplays to the
update action?
Anyone?
The answer appears to be no, given the Rails Guides example and the
Complex Forms Examples: github.com/alloy/complex-form-examples/tarball/
It may not be the problem, but I think there is some strangeness there
in that you have a model called Setting and an attribute called setting.
possibly, Rails is getting confused - is it validating uniqueness of
setting the attribute, or is it thinking that there can be only one
Setting
I tried creating a module in /lib/my_foo/foo_bar.rb called module
MyFoo::FooBar. Inside that module I defined a method getFoo(). I
modified application.rb and added the line config.autoload_paths +=
%W(#{Rails.root}/lib).
When I tried to access MyFoo::FooBar.getFoo() in my controller I got the
yes.
*database.yml* file is ok..
even i can run the *rake db:create* and *rake db:migrate* commands with zero
errors..
wat can be the problem?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
Thanks Frederick, I got it :)
I did this:
FasterCSV.foreach(path_to_csv, :col_sep = ';', :quote_char = ') do
|row|
Used row here!
end
And it removed ' from the string.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Frederick Cheung
frederick.che...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 4:56 am, Surya
90 matches
Mail list logo
