Re: [Rails] Rails Guide:"For belongs_to associations, has_many inverse associations are ignored." not clear?

2012-11-13 Thread Paul Leader
ld in each other. Anyway, if anyone else does understand what that caveat actually means I'd appreciate an explanation. On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:17:22 AM UTC, Greg Donald wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Paul Leader > > > wrote: > > Perhaps I

[Rails] Rails Guide:"For belongs_to associations, has_many inverse associations are ignored." not clear?

2012-11-12 Thread Paul Leader
Perhaps I'm bing a bit thick and missing something obvious (possible), but I found the caveats listed in section 3.5 of the Associations Rails Guide badly worded and confusing. The section gives an example with a has_many <-> belongs_to rel