On May 21, 11:29 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Also cloud hosting is more expensive
than 'classic' hosting unless you plan on being the next Facebook...
Nope. Look at Rackspace Cloud's pricing and say that again with a
straight face.
Actually Rackspace cloud can
Victor Stan wrote:
I'm sure its simple on average. For me, deploying on Site5 was
simpler. I also use a blank repository from which i clone my
production site next to it on the server and my dev site on my local
machine through ssh. Same thing, git push, git pull, don't need heroku
for that,
With Heroku there's no git pull -- just push the code and it does
everything else.
The problem for me is that it wasn't that simple, the app didn't work.
While in an environment like shared hosting (if were comparing low
price things, Heroku has a small free option as well) I have control
over
Victor Stan wrote:
With Heroku there's no git pull -- just push the code and it does
everything else.
The problem for me is that it wasn't that simple, the app didn't work.
Yes, Heroku has certain limitations. But they don't apply to most apps.
While in an environment like shared hosting
I'm sure its simple on average. For me, deploying on Site5 was
simpler. I also use a blank repository from which i clone my
production site next to it on the server and my dev site on my local
machine through ssh. Same thing, git push, git pull, don't need heroku
for that, too costly anyway unless
I would recommend webappcabaret.com.
They have RAILS already setup to run on Mongrel, Passenger as well as
Glassfish.
Price start at $10 per month. And you are still able to use cPanel or
Plesk
for general website management.
Mohammed Alenazi wrote:
Hi
I have registered for some paid rails
I am hosting on Site5 and it was quite a simple process, some forum
tutorial reading might be required if you aren't very familiar with
passenger. I'm using git to synch between my production and local dev
code and its a breeze... Heroku is supposed to be simple, but I found
it more complicated
Victor Stan wrote:
[...]
Heroku is supposed to be simple, but I found
it more complicated than not.
In what way? Git push, migrate, done. How much simpler do you want?
Also cloud hosting is more expensive
than 'classic' hosting unless you plan on being the next Facebook...
Nope. Look
I'd have to second Heroku. It would be hard to devise something
simpler.
On May 19, 3:56 am, Trausti Thor Johannsson t...@studlar.net wrote:
dreamhost.com, they are quite cheap and give you a chance to grow up
for very little money. Then you can grow into a vps at their site or
move
IMHO Heroku is pretty simple.
Kind regards,
Joshua
On May 19, 1:22 am, Mohammed Alenazi vb4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have registered for some paid rails hosting system that uses cpanel
to deploy the rails apps. I could not deploy my app/ I tried several
times with no success.
Does any
dreamhost.com, they are quite cheap and give you a chance to grow up
for very little money. Then you can grow into a vps at their site or
move elsewhere.
What they offer is pretty much unlimited bandwith and diskspace and
they have a very nice cpanel.
Store as many sites as you want.
On Tue,
11 matches
Mail list logo
