Learn Rails by Example (Michael Hartl) is good tutorial (
http://ruby.railstutorial.org/ruby-on-rails-tutorial-book).
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Danaka Kahn
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, cval eval wrote:
>
>> Well, analysis has shown that database should be refactored, bec
On 14 November 2011 17:15, cval eval wrote:
> Well, analysis has shown that database should be refactored, because
> it's pretty unstructured, some data is duplicated or unnecessary etc.
> Some tables are used by another modules(not RoR).
> What is the best way (i mean easiest)) ) to redesign data
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, cval eval wrote:
> Well, analysis has shown that database should be refactored, because
> it's pretty unstructured, some data is duplicated or unnecessary etc.
> Some tables are used by another modules(not RoR).
>
So... I am guessing you wont touch these, or do
Well, analysis has shown that database should be refactored, because
it's pretty unstructured, some data is duplicated or unnecessary etc.
Some tables are used by another modules(not RoR).
What is the best way (i mean easiest)) ) to redesign database?
Should I use migrations?
Or just write databas
Thanks, guys. RoR is 2.3.8
I've already bought third edition of Agile Web Development with Rails.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails
Try buying the book "Agile Web Development with Rails". It might help.
There is also good rails documentation available at
http://rubyonrails.org/documentation
. Browse through http://rubonrails.org to know more about Rails. And
never hesitate to ask doubts in this group.
If you dont know Ruby /
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:34 PM, William Denniss wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 6:12 am, Brian Troutwine wrote:
>> You are correct; I was too terse. The twitter front-end is served up
>> by Rails, from what I understand, it is now largely a consumer of the
>> scala back-end and handles very little to non
On Nov 15, 6:12 am, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> You are correct; I was too terse. The twitter front-end is served up
> by Rails, from what I understand, it is now largely a consumer of the
> scala back-end and handles very little to none of Twitter's business
> logic.
Who really cares where the dat
Santosh Gupta wrote in post #961388:
> Hi,
>
> This is Santosh Gupta working in Accenture, India as project lead and
> J2EE architect.
>
> I need some information about twitter.com.
Then why not ask the folks at Twitter?
> This information I need to
> tell my management & team about the usage of
9 matches
Mail list logo
