Em quarta-feira, 27 de março de 2013 11h36min19s UTC-3, Hassan Schroeder
escreveu:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Paulo Ribeiro
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, i have considered it. But before i just want to know if is possible
> to
> > do this using ActiveRecord. Is it possible to do or not?
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
> Yes, i have considered it. But before i just want to know if is possible to
> do this using ActiveRecord. Is it possible to do or not?
Dunno, never had a reason to try :-)
I think the real question is probably more like "Will the amount o
Em quarta-feira, 27 de março de 2013 10h31min28s UTC-3, Hassan Schroeder
escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Paulo Henrique Lopes Ribeiro
> > wrote:
>
> > Still, i just asked this here, because i thought that someone had tried
> to
> > do it before. In case not, i will try by myself.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Paulo Henrique Lopes Ribeiro
wrote:
> Still, i just asked this here, because i thought that someone had tried to
> do it before. In case not, i will try by myself.
Uh, just checking -- you know Rails has a flag to generate a new
app without ActiveRecord, yes?
Ha
Im not worried about performance. Im worried that i want to use it to
access the database only. All the other logics i want in a separate class.
The callback logics i'm moving to a service. Some other logics to a
decorator and accessor.
I want to do this only to make sure that a person that does n
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:26 AM, tamouse mailing lists
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Paulo Ribeiro
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Em terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 01h49min23s UTC-3, tamouse escreveu:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Paulo Ribeiro
>>> wrote:
>>> > Em segunda-feira, 25
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
>
>
> Em terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 01h49min23s UTC-3, tamouse escreveu:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Paulo Ribeiro
>> wrote:
>> > Em segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 14h39min09s UTC-3, Matt Jones
>> > escreveu:
>> >> On Sund
Em terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 01h49min23s UTC-3, tamouse escreveu:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Paulo Ribeiro
> >
> wrote:
> > Em segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 14h39min09s UTC-3, Matt Jones
> > escreveu:
> >> On Sunday, 24 March 2013 12:59:00 UTC-4, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
> Em segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 14h39min09s UTC-3, Matt Jones
> escreveu:
>> On Sunday, 24 March 2013 12:59:00 UTC-4, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
>>>
>>> Thx for your reply. I want to make the models more light. I want to make
>>> models what
Em segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 14h39min09s UTC-3, Matt Jones
escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 24 March 2013 12:59:00 UTC-4, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
>>
>> Thx for your reply. I want to make the models more light. I want to make
>> models what will only access the database (CRUD), without callbac
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 12:59:00 UTC-4, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
>
> Thx for your reply. I want to make the models more light. I want to make
> models what will only access the database (CRUD), without callbacks and the
> other stuffs it loads.
>
>
Not to be rude, but this is still "what" you want
Thx for your reply. I want to make the models more light. I want to make
models what will only access the database (CRUD), without callbacks and the
other stuffs it loads.
Em sábado, 23 de março de 2013 12h19min06s UTC-3, Matt Jones escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Friday, 22 March 2013 09:56:23 UTC-4, Paul
On Friday, 22 March 2013 09:56:23 UTC-4, Paulo Ribeiro wrote:
>
> Hey guys. Im looking to make a model with fewer included modules from
> ActiveRecord. Basically, i want to include only the modules so it can work
> fine inside rails and with the methods to access the database.
>
> I tried to do
13 matches
Mail list logo
