On 17 November 2010 12:29, MarcRic wrote:
> Colin,
> [...]
> That is the reason, I will never ever change Windows for OS/X, if I
> have to change from Windows, Ubuntu (or any counterpart) will be MY
> choice, because these are MY principles.
Had you quoted me inline rather than top posting you wo
Colin,
I have done my tests on Ubuntu (and many others, like OpenSuse;
RedHat; Gentoo; Debian; a local distribution called Kurumin which is a
very clever one), I'm not particularly a Windows fan.
I just have used it for so many years at work (in my case I have no
control, it has been always a cor
On 16 November 2010 21:30, MarcRic wrote:
> Marnen wrote:
>
>> Oh, I know you *can*. I just don't see why it's worth the bother.
>
> It is YOUR opinion.
>
> I'm really tired of this kind of endless and useless discussions.
It is not necessarily useless, it was just such a discussion that
persuad
MarcRic wrote in post #961927:
> Marnen wrote:
>
>> Oh, I know you *can*. I just don't see why it's worth the bother.
>
> It is YOUR opinion.
>
> I'm really tired of this kind of endless and useless discussions.
Then don't prolong them by responding.
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marne
Marnen wrote:
> Oh, I know you *can*. I just don't see why it's worth the bother.
It is YOUR opinion.
I'm really tired of this kind of endless and useless discussions.
I only answered a topic named: "how to install ror on windows 7",
which is MY interest.
I'm trying to keep the focus on the o
MarcRic wrote in post #961715:
> Davo,
>
> When I say "alternatives better then both", I mean other HTTP Web
> servers which is the subject now.
>
> The O.S. of the server is just a matter of taste or a decision already
> made for you.
Not necessarily. Many of us have significant control over tha
Davo,
When I say "alternatives better then both", I mean other HTTP Web
servers which is the subject now.
The O.S. of the server is just a matter of taste or a decision already
made for you.
I have my personal choices concerning O.S. for servers (Servers in
general not only for Web Servers), but
MarcRic wrote in post #961698:
> Hi Davo,
>
> The mongrel item was covered in the next item of that material, but it
> was for Rails 2.3.6.
>
> With the retirement of Zed Shaw and the current Rails 3 version, for
> developments purpose Webrick will do the job pretty well.
>
> In a real production s
Hi Davo,
The mongrel item was covered in the next item of that material, but it
was for Rails 2.3.6.
With the retirement of Zed Shaw and the current Rails 3 version, for
developments purpose Webrick will do the job pretty well.
In a real production server You will find many alternatives better
t
Thanks Marcos,
But I'm a bit confused over the list at the beginning that mentions
Mongrel 1.1.6 beta ?
I have been unable to get Mongrel going and have been 'Stuck' on
Webrick.
So even though Mongrel is mentioned it is not included in your
instructions :(
Kind Regards, Dave
On Nov 13, 8:58 pm,
Hi Romeu,
I insist: everything you need is detailed here:
http://www.public.traineronrails.com/guides/rails/pages/01-rails_install.htm
You can easily follow it updating when necessary (as I have
done myself) to Ruby 1.9.2 and Rails 3.0.1.
Hope it helps
--
MarcRic
www.marcric.com
http://marcric
Go to here and download the pre-compiled "sqlitedll" package. Unzip
it to your "Ruby\bin" directory
http://www.sqlite.org/download.html
Allen Cook
On Nov 7, 8:22 pm, romeo rap wrote:
> On Nov 6, 7:36 am, venkata reddy wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
> > i want to learn ruby on rails.i am
Hi Venkata and others,
I start creating a free Rails course material few months ago, but
Rails 3 was released before I finished it.
I will be re-factoring it to Rails 3 soon, but since many Windows
users request that kind of stuff, I have published it here:
http://www.public.traineronrails.com/g
On Nov 6, 7:36 am, venkata reddy wrote:
> Hi all,
> i want to learn ruby on rails.i am using window7 .
> I installed ruby 1.9.2 p0 in "C:\ruby" using one click
> installer.and then installed
> rails using the command "gem install rails". and rails get installed
> successfully. After that i t
If you don't install the DevKit after you install Ruby, you won't get
very far. It's only a matter of time, and a short one it will be,
before you need to install a gem that require compilation and thus
need DevKit. Might as well do it now.
http://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/wiki/Developmen
Try putting the sqlite3 files in c:\ruby\bin
(there should be def, dll and exe (although I think only the dll and
exe files are needed )
Also just be sure that c:\ruby\bin is correctly pathed!)
If you prefer using MySql, this came up via rubyflow this morning.
http://www.celticwolf.com/blog/2010/1
16 matches
Mail list logo
