Hi,
My names Justin King, I'm a part of a research project at Swinburne
University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia. my question is in regards
to the new Drools and more specifically fusion. I'm having trouble
determining whether Fusion might fulfill a requirement of our project so
I have a simple flow with human task and I want to persist it into database.
I'm using MSSQL DB.
My code is like this:
KnowledgeBase kbase = readKnowledgeBase();
// create the entity manager factory and register it in
the environment
Justin King wrote:
Hi,
My names Justin King, I'm a part of a research project at
Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia. my
question is in regards to the new Drools and more specifically
fusion. I'm having trouble determining whether Fusion might
fulfill
Michael Neale would know better on the progress, but we discussed this exact
feature back at Javaone a few months ago. My view is the selectors are still
experimental, but are very close to being able to use. There have been talks
about how to harden it up and do just what you are asking for.
I am also lookign for similar features(API) from Guvnor.
I am using Eclipse Drools Plugin. I want to build the rules on IDE and deploy
the compiled rules package to Guvnor and want the Rules app to use the packages
from Guvnor URL.
Also is there a way to make Guvnor use SVN instead of JCR?
Michael,
That is really good news! Due to the timeline my project is on, I think
I'm going to have to implement some kind of workaround for now (I'm
thinking a JSP that exposes the behavior I need in a REST-like way). I
would however be very interested in helping with development as well as
Michael Steve,
We would need to be able to pick certain rules using selectors for different
runs too, and I will help you with testing efforts.
Regards,
Prem
2009/8/4 Steve Ronderos steve.ronde...@ni.com
Michael,
That is really good news! Due to the timeline my project is on, I think
The jboss.org documentation describes rule templates as an experimental
feature. In particular, the API is
subject to change. However, the Red Hat documentation does not caveat rule
templates as experimental in any way. Are templates (which are available in
other BRMSs) no longer considered
Ken Archer wrote:
The jboss.org documentation describes rule templates as an
experimental feature. In particular, the API is subject to change.
However, the Red Hat documentation does not caveat rule templates as
experimental in any way. Are templates (which are available in
other BRMSs)
