Is there any reason why you don't start with the binary distributions?
Building from the source requires some experience.
The message indicates that some tests failed; the reason(s) can be found in
files at the indicated location. You could try the build with skipping the
tests, add -DskipTests to
rule whatever
@meta( data )
when
then
end
-W
2011/3/17 Peter C. Marks
> Hello,
>
> In section 4.7.2 of the Drools Expert User Guide, it states: "Metadata
> may be assigned to several different constructions in Drools: fact types,
> fact attributes and rules. " I could not figure out how to at
Take a look at the documentation of the "from" keyword
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Connectivity-with-Database-tp2693512p2696533.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Messages can be sent to a process that has been started to get it to "wake
up" from a wait state.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-trigger-a-certain-task-within-an-ad-hoc-subprocess-tp2684050p2696496.html
Sent from the Drools - User maili
I've noticed that the LHS of the Eclipse Guided Rule Editor can employ DSL
sentences or an object model, but there doesn't seem to be a manner to
incorporate the DSL on the RHS of rules (other in "free form" code)
Is that by design? Or is there some property that can enable the dialog
box/drop-do
anyone can help address this question?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-trigger-a-certain-task-within-an-ad-hoc-subprocess-tp2684050p2696477.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello; I am aware of the fundamental difference between inserting facts--and
evaluating them against all the rules in the rule base--and firing
rules--i.e., executing only certain rules' consequences.
I understand that ruleflow-group and agenda-group and activation-group can
all be employed to gov
Hello,
In section 4.7.2 of the Drools Expert User Guide, it states: "Metadata may
be assigned to several different constructions in Drools: fact types, fact
attributes and rules. " I could not figure out how to attach metadata to a
rule. Is this feature available?
Thanks,
Peter
___
Greg,
I will look into that. Trunk is under heavy work right now, so it will
probably not work.
Edson
2011/3/17 Greg Barton
> Yes, but I just fired up a small project using it and it used 100% of CPU.
> If you build the attached project you'll see the tests run just fine. (They
> use
Yes, please. Thank you,
Edson
2011/3/17 Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça
> I forgot to mention that I’m running in stream mode, yes J
>
>
>
> I’m having problems regarding event expiration: I define events with
> @expires(1h) but they won’t disappear, I had to write some rules to force
> t
Yes, but I just fired up a small project using it and it used 100% of CPU. If
you build the attached project you'll see the tests run just fine. (They use
fireAllRules.) If you launch from the commandline, ("java -jar
target/DroolsBoxes-1.0.jar") which uses fireUntilHalt, the rules fire (and
To be honest, I believe so, but didn't profiled it extensively. I used
fireUntilHalt() in my Webinar yesterday on a live demo and it worked nicely.
Edson
2011/3/17 Greg Barton
>
> Has the performance problem with fireUntilHalt been fixed in 5.2?
>
> --- On *Thu, 3/17/11, Makewise - Vitor
Has the performance problem with fireUntilHalt been fixed in 5.2?
--- On Thu, 3/17/11, Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça
wrote:
From: Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires
To: "'Rules Users List'"
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011,
Don't forget Facts are matched as they are inserted into WorkingMemory too.
fireallRules() only executes the resulting activations on the agenda - that
as Thomas states can be controlled by a number of means.
On 17 March 2011 14:04, Swindells, Thomas wrote:
> Actually what you want is that only
Actually what you want is that only the rules from the DRLs that you want are
activated and their consequences run (a subtle but important distinction). Put
another way it doesn't matter how many rules are in the knowledge base and
evaluated as long as only the rules you want are matched.
There
You lost me. Why are you defining a rule to retract your event? If you
are running in STREAM mode, @expires will take care of the retraction for
you automatically...
Regarding threads, I said by default because there is an experimental
feature that makes drools start internal threads, but th
Hi all,
I want to make Connectivity to a external Database through my Drool Guvnor
so that I can directly create rules on attributes of that tables of
Database.
Please suggest me some way to solve this problem.
Thanks in Advance.
Kedar.
___
rules-users m
Thanks for the answer. Yes, it may be easier to achieve with simple date fact
but we have thousands of rules and each and every one of them has this temporal
requirement. I was thinking along the lines of SessionClock. I know there is a
'realtime' and 'pseudoclock' implementation of it. May be I
Thanks everyone for your inputs
Yes, so the confusion that I have is, with loading multiple drls. If I load
all the drls in memory(may be 100s), does it mean that when I say
fireallRules, it is going to run the rules from all the drls?? That is what
I don't want.
For a particular session at runt
Hi,
I'm encountering a strange problem with debugging an Drools
application in Eclipse Platform. I couldn't find any help in the
internet. Also, i can't find any previous post in this mailing list.
Please try to help me.
My Platform details are below:
O
Have you looked at fireUntilHalt?
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Makewise - Vitor Rui
Mendonça
Sent: 17 March 2011 11:20
To: 'Rules Users List'
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires
Edison,
Edison, first of all, thanks for your quick reply!
Those initial words caught my attention, although: “By default, Drools does not
start any internal thread”…
What do you mean “by default”?
I know there are ways to force the event to be expired but I’m looking for a
solution that doesn’t involv
On 16/03/2011 16:49, Chris Selwyn wrote:
> I am running Drools (actually JBoss Rules 5.1.0 ) in Glassfish.
I'm pretty sure that there was a jira for this and I fixed it - take a
look at 5.2M1.
The code is from the jci project, which we inlined.
Mark
> My deployable is an EJB that uses a Stateles
Hello all
I need to migrate from 4.0.7 drools to 5.1, could you please give some
advices and links?
We have drools JBRMS 4.0.7 app with lots of rules, persisted in Oracle. We
haven't any .drl files for these rules. I've tried to export these rules via
export feature from JBRMS 4 and then import t
Done... https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2928
Chris
On 16/03/2011 18:33, Edson Tirelli wrote:
This is JCI code that we inline. We should probably check if there
is a new JCI version that fixes the problem if it is indeed a problem.
Can I ask you please to open a JIRA with the i
I'd definitely suggest this approach. Compiling DRL files into a knowledge base
is very expensive and something you want to avoid doing as much as possible
and probably wouldn't come anywhere close to meeting your performance
requirements!
Thomas
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[ma
You could hold them all in a single KnowledgeBase with "State", "FactorY"
and "FactorX" as Facts themselves checked in the Rules' RHS.
You could still have multiple DRL files (to aid authoring and maintenance)
but load them all at once. The RETE network shares nodes for patterns shared
across mult
27 matches
Mail list logo
