On 28/12/2011 21:54, Mark Proctor wrote:
> On 28/12/2011 20:31, drools.user wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> We are one month away from pushing our code into Production. So, I don't
>> think we will be able to move to 5.4 beta 1. Even though code change
>> involved might be minimal, it has to
On 28/12/2011 20:31, drools.user wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> We are one month away from pushing our code into Production. So, I don't
> think we will be able to move to 5.4 beta 1. Even though code change
> involved might be minimal, it has to go through full testing cycle which is
> very t
Thanks for your reply.
We are one month away from pushing our code into Production. So, I don't
think we will be able to move to 5.4 beta 1. Even though code change
involved might be minimal, it has to go through full testing cycle which is
very time consuming. Also, I don't think Management will
On 27/12/2011 21:16, drools.user wrote:
> We are planning on moving from Drools 3.0.5 to Drools 5.2.0. In Load Testing
> of Drools 5.2, we faced some issues:
>
> 1. KnowledgeBaseImpl Object in Drools 5 is almost 50% bigger than
> ReteooRuleBase Object of Drools 3.
> 2. The server heap memory usage
We are planning on moving from Drools 3.0.5 to Drools 5.2.0. In Load Testing
of Drools 5.2, we faced some issues:
1. KnowledgeBaseImpl Object in Drools 5 is almost 50% bigger than
ReteooRuleBase Object of Drools 3.
2. The server heap memory usage keeps on increasing during Load Testing to
finally
