On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Niko Matsakis wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23:23PM -0800, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> > I'm also slightly concerned that #[deriving(Data)] gives the
> > impression that there's a trait Data, so maybe that should be
> > lowercased as in #[deriving(data)], or even
As long as monadic bind is usually inlined away, I'll be happy. Needless
closure allocation can add a performance argument against using HOFs.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carter Schonwald <
carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> indeed. I wonder how many rust idioms will change once HKT is so
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Niko Matsakis wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:36:11PM +0100, Gábor Lehel wrote:
> > I don't see the difference here. Why do you think this should be handled
> > differently?
>
> To be honest I hadn't thought about it before. I agree there is no
> fundamental di
This is a misleading propaganda against C++. I think it's pure marketing.
I hope this code ugly C++ was not on purpose.
I think it would be fair that you enable comments on the website so I can
show how to code in real C++. Do you dare to discuss seriously?
If the feedback is in a different place
On 3/2/14 8:34 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
This is a misleading propaganda against C++. I think it's pure marketing.
I hope this code ugly C++ was not on purpose.
I think it would be fair that you enable comments on the website so I
can show how to code in real C++. Do you dare to discuss se
What about "Feedback very welcome on the rust-dev mailing list or on
Twitter." ?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:
> On 3/2/14 8:34 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
>
>> This is a misleading propaganda against C++. I think it's pure marketing.
>> I hope this code ugly C++ was
I don't have the Steve's email address.
Please could someone provide it.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
> What about "Feedback very welcome on the rust-dev mailing list or on
> Twitter." ?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:
>
>> On 3
Notice that there was a link to a two-month old thread on the list.
His email is in that...
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni
wrote:
> I don't have the Steve's email address.
> Please could someone provide it.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Fernando Pelliccion
On 3/2/14 8:41 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
What about "Feedback very welcome on the rust-dev mailing list or on
Twitter." ?
Oh, I didn't realize the blog post contained that. Well, I assume that
was soliciting feedback regarding using the post, or something derived
from it, as an official
Alright, I've pushed out an update that includes the resizing
functionality. I haven't explored the question of whether there's a
performance penalty or not, but it looks like there may not be one. If
there is one, it's very small. Even with reallocations occurring (which
would not be the norm), it
10 matches
Mail list logo
