Notice that there was a link to a two-month old thread on the list.
His email is in that...

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't have the Steve's email address.
> Please could someone provide it.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Fernando Pelliccioni
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> What about "Feedback very welcome on the rust-dev mailing list or on
>> Twitter." ?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Patrick Walton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/2/14 8:34 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is a misleading propaganda against C++. I think it's pure
>>>> marketing.
>>>> I hope this code ugly C++ was not on purpose.
>>>>
>>>> I think it would be fair that you enable comments on the website so I
>>>> can show how to code in real C++. Do you dare to discuss seriously?
>>>>
>>>> If the feedback is in a different place (mailing list), the reader of
>>>> the article does not have a chance to really compare the two languages.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, but discussion of blog posts that aren't part of the official Rust
>>> documentation aren't on-topic for this mailing list. Please email Steve
>>> privately.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rust-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
>



-- 
http://octayn.net/
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to